e23120 Background: 15%-25% of breast cancer neoplasms exhibit Human epidermal growth factor receptor-2(HER2) amplification, as the driver mutation.Techniques to identify HER2 amplification include Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and Fluorescence in situ Hybridization (FISH). Digital PCR (dPCR) has been increasingly explored in determining HER2 status in cases of indeterminate results on IHC, mainly in archived samples. In this study, we aim to demonstrate the clinical utility of the Quantstudio 3D Digital PCR system to evaluate HER2 levels from Formalin Fixed Paraffin Embedded (FFPE) tissue with RNaseP as a control target. Methods: 61 tissue samples were analyzed by IHC and dPCR in parallel in a double blinded manner. IHC equivocal samples were reflexed to FISH and compared to the results obtained from dPCR. Samples suboptimal for IHC or FISH were satisfactorily processed by dPCR. dPCR results were analyzed on the Thermofisher Cloud platform. The general turnaround time(TAT) was about 2 and 3 days for IHC and FISH respectively with that of dPCR being 24 hours. Results: All 9 IHC positive and 35 negative samples had similar results on dPCR using an amplification ratio threshold for a positive result of 1.8. Of 17 IHC-equivocal samples, 5 resulted as positive, 10 negative and 2 as equivocal by dPCR. There was 100% concordance between the dPCR and FISH results. Two IHC equivocal samples that were unanalyzable by FISH were negative on dPCR Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that the chip based dPCR was non-inferior for HER2 detection in FFPE samples in a clinical setting. Superior TAT's and objective results were obtained compared to more subjective techniques like FISH and IHC even with low sample input. dPCR requires controls but no standards for calibration as it gives absolute copy numbers. Further study is needed to understand dPCR interpretation in cases of chromosomal aneuploidy. [Table: see text]
Quantitative Assessment of HER2 Gene Amplification of Breast Cancer Using Droplet Digital PCR