Performance of Pediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM), Pediatric Index of Mortality (PIM), and PIM2 in a pediatric intensive care unit in a developing country

2006 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 356-361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anu Thukral ◽  
Rakesh Lodha ◽  
Mohammad Irshad ◽  
Narendra K. Arora
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 205031211982550 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kamal Sharma ◽  
Andre Raszynski ◽  
Balagangadhar R Totapally

Introduction: Obesity is associated with poor health outcomes but may be protective in intensive care unit patients. The objective of this study is to describe the characteristics of underweight, normal weight, and obese children, and to compare their length of stay, resource utilization, and mortality. Methods: The charts of 1447 patients who were admitted to a tertiary-level pediatric intensive care unit during 1 calendar year were reviewed. Patients were divided into three groups: underweight (<5th percentile), normal (5th–95th percentiles), and obese (>95th percentile). Body mass index for age percentile was used for children older than age 2 years, and weight-for-height percentile was used for children younger than age 2 years. Demographic data, Pediatric Index of Mortality 2 score, Pediatric Index of Mortality 2 risk of mortality, hospital mortality, hospital length of stay, the use and duration of ventilator support, hemodynamic support, and dialysis were determined. Results: Fifteen percent of children were underweight, while 61.5% were normal weight and 23.5% were obese; 54.9% of the patients were male. The overall mortality was 1.87%, with no significant difference between the three weight groups. The racial distribution, prevalence, and duration of invasive and noninvasive ventilation, and the use of vasopressors, central venous lines, and dialysis were similar between three groups. Tube feeding and parenteral nutrition were used more often in the underweight group. Pediatric intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stays were higher in underweight children. Underweight children were younger when compared to normal or obese children. Pediatric Index of Mortality 2 scores and Pediatric Index of Mortality 2 risk of mortality scores were higher in underweight children. Conclusion: There were no significant differences between the three weight groups in mortality. Underweight children were younger and sicker, and received tube feeding and parenteral nutrition more frequently.


2021 ◽  
Vol In Press (In Press) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hossein Saidi ◽  
Hamed Basir Ghafouri ◽  
Hamed Aghdam ◽  
Ghamartaj Khanbabaei ◽  
Narges Ahmadizadeh ◽  
...  

Objectives: The research aimed to evaluate the Pediatric Index of Mortality 3 (PIM-3) for determining the risk of mortality among pediatric intensive care unit patients. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on case records, as well as patient data from all admissions to the PICU of Mofid Children’s Hospital, Tehran, from October 2017 to February 2018. Employing an android calculator application, the PIM-3 score was estimated early within the first PICU admission. Then, the PIM-3 score and mortality rate were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test. In addition, calibration and discrimination were assessed by the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test and a receiver operating characteristic curve method, respectively. Finally, the Standardized Mortality Ratio (SMR) was calculated. Results: In this study, 365 young infants, ranging from 10 to 29-months-old, were included. The overall mortality rate was 10.4%. Further, the patients’ PIM-3 scores ranged from 0.06% to 2.37% (95% confidence interval), with a mean of 1.45% (4.16% in non-survivors and 1.14% in survivors). The SMR was estimated at 7.18, demonstrating the underprediction of the death rate. The AUC of 0.714 (95% CI: 0.626 to 0.801) demonstrated a fair to good discrimination power of PIM-3 as an international standard risk-adjusted mortality indicator. Moreover, this score underpredicted the risk of mortality in young infants admitted to our ICU in 2017. Generally, the prediction was weak among low-risk patients. Therefore, the Pediatric Index of Mortality-3 score has the potential to be implemented in our PICU by modifying the expected probability of death by multiplying the original PIM-3 score by 7.12.


Author(s):  
Shifa Nismath ◽  
Suchetha S. Rao ◽  
B. S. Baliga ◽  
Vaman Kulkarni ◽  
Gayatri M. Rao

Abstract Background Predicting morbidity and mortality in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) is of extreme importance to make precise decisions for better outcomes. Aim We compared the urine albumin creatinine ratio (ACR) with the established PICU score, pediatric index of mortality 2 (PIM 2) for predicting PICU outcomes. Methods This cross-sectional study enrolled 67 patients admitted to PICU with systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Urine ACR was estimated on admission, and PIM 2 score was calculated. ACR was compared with PIM 2 for PICU outcome measures: the need for inotropes, development of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), duration of PICU stay, and survival. Results Microalbuminuria was found in 77.6% of patients with a median ACR of 80 mg/g. ACR showed a significant association with the need for inotropes (p < 0.001), MODS (p = 0.001), and significant correlation to PICU stay (p 0.001, rho = 0.361). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for ACR (0.798) was comparable to that of PIM 2 (0.896). The cutoff value of ACR derived to predict mortality was 110 mg/g. The study subjects were divided into 2 groups: below cutoff and above the cutoff. Outcome variables, inotrope use, MODS, mortality, and PICU stay compared between these subgroups, were statistically significant. Conclusion ACR is a good predictor of PICU outcomes and is comparable to PIM 2 for mortality prediction.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kanokpan Ruangnapa ◽  
Sittikiat Sucheewakul ◽  
Tippawan Liabsuetrakul ◽  
Edward McNeil ◽  
Kantara Lim ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 35-41
Author(s):  
Ahmed Abd El Basset Abo-El Ezz ◽  
Khaled T. Abu-Ela ◽  
Aml Z. Abd Elaziz ◽  
Maaly M. Mabrouk ◽  
Ehab Abd Elhalem Abo Ali

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (8) ◽  
pp. 1198-1206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed El-Nawawy ◽  
Galal A. Ashraf ◽  
Manal A.M. Antonios ◽  
Marwa A. Meheissen ◽  
Marwa M.R. El-Alfy

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document