Locked Plate Fixation and Intramedullary Nailing for Proximal Humerus Fractures: A Biomechanical Evaluation

2005 ◽  
Vol 58 (6) ◽  
pp. 1194-1201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Henri Hessmann ◽  
Werner Sternstein Matthias Hansen ◽  
Frank Krummenauer ◽  
Tamara Fischer Pol ◽  
Maria Rommens
2013 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 178-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
James S. Raphael ◽  
M. Rashad Booker ◽  
Minn H. Saing ◽  
Andrew B. Beaver ◽  
Sean C. Marvil ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 81-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. A. Egiazaryan ◽  
A P. Ratyev ◽  
D. I. Gordienko ◽  
A. V. Grigoriev ◽  
N. V. Ovcharenko

Background.Treatment tactics of proximal humerus fractures remains a matter of dispute due to multiple cases of unsatisfactory outcomes and high rate of postoperative complications.The aim of the study—to evaluate midterm outcomes of intramedullary fixation for treatment the proximal humerus fractures in comparison with plate fixation.Material and Methods.The authors evaluated treatment outcomes of 175 patients with proximal humerus fractures who underwent surgery in the period from 2012 to 2017. Depending on the fixation method the patients were divided into two groups: the main group consisted of 107 patients who underwent intramedullary fixation by a nail of third generation; a comparison group — consisting of 68 patients who underwent fixation by a locking plate with angular stability.Results.In one year after intramedullary nail fixation the authors observed the excellent and good outcomes on Constant scale in 83.2% of cases, satisfactory — 12.1%, unsatisfactory — 4.7%. Patients who underwent plate fixation demonstrated the following outcomes: excellent and good — 73.5%, satisfactory — 17.7%, unsatisfactory — in 8.8%. Constant score increase was equal in the main and control groups and varied depending on the fracture type.Conclusion.Intramedullary nailing is an option for treatment of all fracture types of proximal humerus as well as for the cases of combined humeral neck and diaphysis fractures. Functional recovery parameters were higher in the main group of patients after intramedullary nailing.


2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fu Wang ◽  
Yan Wang ◽  
Jinye Dong ◽  
Yu He ◽  
Lianxin Li ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and hypothesis The typical anterolateral approach is widely used to treat proximal humerus fractures with lateral locking fixation. However, lateral fixation cannot completely avoid medial reduction loss and varus deformity especially in the cases of an unstable medial column. We present a novel medial surgical approach and technique together with a minimally invasive lateral locking plate to fix proximal humerus fractures with an unstable medial column. Materials and methods We performed an anatomical study and reported 8 cases of proximal humerus fractures with unstable medial columns treated with plate fixation through a minimally invasive anterolateral approach and medial approach. All surgeries were performed by the same single surgeon. Patients were followed clinically and radiographically at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Results There was a safe region located at the medial part of the proximal humerus just beneath the articular surface. An anatomical medial locking proximal humerus plate could be placed in the medial column and did not affect the axillary nerve, blood supply of the humeral head, or stability of the shoulder joint. Successful fracture healing was achieved in all 8 cases. The function and range of motion of the shoulder joint were satisfactory 24 months postoperatively, with an average Constant score (CS) of 82.8. No reduction loss (≥ 10° in any direction), screw cutout, nonunion, or deep infection occurred. Conclusions The combined application of medial anatomical locking plate fixation and minimally invasive lateral locking plate fixation is effective in maintaining operative reduction and preventing varus collapse and implant failure in proximal humerus fractures with an unstable medial column.


Injury ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 408-413 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert C. Sproul ◽  
Jaicharan J. Iyengar ◽  
Zlatko Devcic ◽  
Brian T. Feeley

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document