scholarly journals Key Insights from the Development and Implementation of a Novel Virtual Interview Process for Medical School Admissions During the COVID-19 Pandemic

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Evan Garden ◽  
Emma Loebel ◽  
Charles Sanky ◽  
Jacquelyn Chudow ◽  
Robert Fallar ◽  
...  
OTO Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473974X2110679
Author(s):  
Nicole Rose Blumenstein ◽  
David Mendel Bruss ◽  
Krystal Kan ◽  
Jeffrey Yu

Due to the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, virtual interviews are planned for the 2021-2022 residency application cycle. The virtual interview will remain novel to applicants for each match cycle until the graduating medical student class has experience from virtual interviews during their medical school admissions. The virtual interview poses unique challenges that are unique from in-person formats. Given the lack of experience of applicants in the 2022 match, practicing interviewing skills prior to the actual date is vital to success. We describe a postgraduate year 1 (PGY1)–run mock interview session for applicants preparing for the 2021-2022 otolaryngology interview cycle and discuss the methodology. Deliberate practice with PGY1 residents who have just recently undergone the virtual interview process can better prepare applicants for their virtual interviews, improve on-camera behaviors, and ameliorate mental health challenges unique to the virtual format.


2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-189
Author(s):  
Nancy L. Zisk

AbstractThe tremendous toll that COVID-19 has taken on this country’s minority population is the most recent reminder of the health disparities between people of color and people who classify themselves as white. There are many reasons for these disparities, but one that gets less attention than it deserves is the lack of physicians of color available to treat patients of color.


Author(s):  
Katherine Girgulis ◽  
Andrea Rideout ◽  
Mohsin Rashid

Background: Diversity in medical schools has lagged behind Canada’s growing multicultural population. Dalhousie medical school allows Black and Indigenous applicants to self-identify. We examined how these applicants performed and progressed through the admissions process compared to Other group (applicants who did not self-identify). Methods: Retrospective analysis of four application cycles (2015-2019) was conducted, comparing demographic data, scores for application components (Computer-Based Assessment for Sampling Personal Characteristics (CASPer), MCAT, GPA, supplemental, discretionary, Multiple Mini Interview (MMI)), and final application status between the three groups. Results: Of 1322 applicants, 104 identified as Black, 64 Indigenous, and 1154 Other. GPA was higher in the Other compared to the Indigenous group (p < 0.001). CASPer score was higher in the Other compared to the Black group (p = 0.047). There was no difference between groups for all other application components. A large proportion of Black and Indigenous applicants had incomplete applications. Acceptance rates were similar between all groups. Black applicants declined an admission offer substantially more than expected (31%; p < 0.001). Conclusions: Black and Indigenous applicants who completed their application progressed well through the admissions process. The pool of diverse applicants needs to be increased and support provided for completion of applications. Further study is warranted to understand why qualified applicants decline acceptance.


2018 ◽  
Vol 52 (6) ◽  
pp. 587-589
Author(s):  
Kirsty Alexander ◽  
Jennifer Cleland

2003 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 4333 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Elizabeth Rippentrop ◽  
Matthew Yung-Sang Wong ◽  
Elizabeth M. Altmaier

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document