scholarly journals Implementation and Use of Workplace-Based Assessment in Clinical Learning Environments

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannah L. Anderson ◽  
Joshua Kurtz ◽  
Daniel C. West
Author(s):  
Adinda Kharisma Apriliani ◽  
Eti Poncorini Pamungkasari ◽  
Amandha Boy Timor Randita

Background: Needs of health workers, especially general practitioners, relatively high in Indonesia. Career choices among medical students are various, such as general practitioner, specialist, medical researcher, etc. Many factors affect medical students’ career choices, one of them is learning environments. This study aims to prove the correlation between clerkship students’ perceptions of clinical learning environments and their career choices.Methods: This research was an analytical observational research with cross sectional approach. The subjects were clerkship students who underwent clinical rotation. The samples were 178 clerkship students from all departments. They were chosen by probability proportional to size sampling. Every respondent was given career choices questionnaire and PHEEM questionnaire which has analyzed for its validity and reliability with α≥0,6 (α=0,826) and r≥0,30 (r=0,442). The result of this study was analyzed by Chi-square test and followed by Contingency Coefficient with 95% confidence level (α = 0,05). Result: The result showed that students’ perception of clinical learning environment “good but still need improvement” category was nearly the same as “plenty of problems” category. The result on the students’ career choices, most students choose clinical career. There was significant correlation between perception of clinical learning environment and career choices on clerkship students of medical faculty, Sebelas Maret University with p <0,05 (p= 0,018), x2 count (x2=5,625) > x2 table (x2=3,841) and also very weak correlation (C= 0,189).Conclusion: There was very weak correlation between perception of clinical learning environments and career choice on clerkship students. 


2018 ◽  
Vol 93 (10) ◽  
pp. 1441-1444 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul N. Uhlig ◽  
Joy Doll ◽  
Kristy Brandon ◽  
Christopher Goodman ◽  
Josephine Medado-Ramirez ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 683-687
Author(s):  
Maria Aaron ◽  
Philip Shayne ◽  
Erica Brownfield ◽  
Nathan O. Spell ◽  
Jaffar Khan ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Background The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Clinical Learning Environment Review (CLER) program visits 1 participating site per sponsoring institution. While valuable, feedback on that site does not necessarily generalize to all learning environments where trainees and faculty provide clinical care, and institutions may be missing significant insight and feedback on other clinical learning sites. Objective We explored how the Emory Learning Environment Evaluation process—modeled after CLER—could be used to improve the learning environments at 5 major clinical training sites. Methods Participants were recruited via e-mail. Sites hosted separate 60-minute sessions for medical students, residents and fellows, and faculty. We used the CLER Pathways to Excellence to develop a combination of fixed choice and opened-ended questions deployed via an audience response system and verbal queries. Data were analyzed primarily through descriptive statistics and graphs. Results Across sites, per session, medical student participants ranged from 9–16, residents and fellows ranged 21–30, and faculty ranged 15–29. Learners agreed that sites: (1) provided a supportive culture for requesting supervision (students 100%; residents and fellows 70%–100%), and (2) provided a supportive culture for reporting patient safety events (students 94%–100%; residents and fellows 91%–95%). Only a minority of residents and fellows and faculty agreed that they were educated on how to provide effective supervision (residents and fellows 21%–52%; faculty 45%–64%). Conclusions Data from this process have helped standardize improvement efforts across multiple clinical learning environments within our sponsoring institution.


2014 ◽  
Vol 370 (11) ◽  
pp. 991-993 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas J. Nasca ◽  
Kevin B. Weiss ◽  
James P. Bagian

Author(s):  
Bulan Kakanita Hermasari ◽  
Erinda Kusuma Wardani ◽  
Agus Jati Sunggoro

Background: Learning environment is one parameter to evaluate the quality of learning. The learning approach reflects how a student learns in various situations that affect learning. This study aims to know the relationship between the perceptions of the learning environment and the learning approaches in the clerkship students of Medical Faculty.Methods: This research used an analytical observational method with cross-sectional technique. The sample selection technique used cluster sampling. Respondents consisted of 178 students from all clinical rotations. Each respondent was given two questionnaires to assess perceptions of the learning environment and learning approaches. Data were analyzed using contingency coefficient test.Results: Student perceptions of the learning environment show similar results between the number of clinical rotations that have the category of 'good but need improvement' (9 clinical rotations) and the 'many problems' category (9 clinical rotations). Most of the students (84.27%) used the in-depth learning approach, the remaining 10.67% used the strategic approach, and 5.06% used the surface approach. There was relationship between learning environment perception and learning approach with contingency coefficient value C = 0.312, and value p = 0,001 (p <0.05).Conclusion: There is a weak relationship between perception of clinical learning environments and learning approach on clerkship students of the medical faculty, University Sebelas Maret..   


2019 ◽  
pp. 31-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saeed Shahabi ◽  
Mohammad Kamali ◽  
Hossein Mobaraki ◽  
Narges Shafaroodi ◽  
Hassan Saeedi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document