scholarly journals Medical Student Evaluation of Faculty in Student–Preceptor Pairs

2007 ◽  
Vol 82 (Suppl) ◽  
pp. S30-S33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rita M. Willett ◽  
Sonya R. Lawson ◽  
Judy S. Gary ◽  
Indra A. Kancitis
2001 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brent C. Williams ◽  
Matthew S. Pillsbury ◽  
David T. Stern ◽  
Cyril M. Grum

1997 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey E. Stake

Haskell (1997) argued that the administrative practice of student evaluation of faculty is a threat to academic freedom. However, before that claim can be substantiated, several prior questions must be addressed: To whom does academic freedom belong? Individual faculty? The academy? Whose actions can violate the right? Can any lines be drawn based on whether the substance or form of classroom behavior is influenced? And still another crucial point is whether a body can violate academic freedom without any intent to interfere with or control the substance of what is said to students.


Author(s):  
Albert Akyeampong ◽  
Teresa Franklin ◽  
Jared Keengwe

This study explored one primary question: To what extent do student perceptions of various forms of instructional technology tools predict instructional quality? Participants for the study were drawn from a teacher education program in a large Midwest public university. Data were collected using a web-based survey with a total of 121 responses used in the final analysis. A multiple regression analysis was conducted to evaluate how well Productivity Tools, Presentation Tools, Communication Tools, and World Wide Web Tools predict Student Evaluation of Faculty Instructional Quality. The overall significant results of the regression model and the subsequent significant results of the t-test for Presentation Tools and Productivity Tools is an indication that Presentation and Productivity tools can be used by faculty to facilitate student and faculty interaction, promote cooperation among students, promote active learning techniques, give prompt feedback, emphasize time on task, communicate high expectation and respect diverse talents and ways of learning.


2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 443-446
Author(s):  
Nicole Craker ◽  
S. Bruce Binder ◽  
Adrienne Stolfi ◽  
Brenda Roman ◽  
Nicole Borges

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document