Handbook on Medical Student Evaluation and Assessment,

2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 337-338
Author(s):  
S. Beth Bierer
2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 443-446
Author(s):  
Nicole Craker ◽  
S. Bruce Binder ◽  
Adrienne Stolfi ◽  
Brenda Roman ◽  
Nicole Borges

2001 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brent C. Williams ◽  
Matthew S. Pillsbury ◽  
David T. Stern ◽  
Cyril M. Grum

2007 ◽  
Vol 82 (Suppl) ◽  
pp. S30-S33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rita M. Willett ◽  
Sonya R. Lawson ◽  
Judy S. Gary ◽  
Indra A. Kancitis

2017 ◽  
Vol 68 (3) ◽  
pp. 249-256 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kari L. Visscher ◽  
Lisa Faden ◽  
Georges Nassrallah ◽  
Stacey Speer ◽  
Daniele Wiseman

Purpose This article is a continuation of a qualitative study designed to explore how radiology exposures can impact medical student opinions and perceptions of radiology and radiologists. We focused on: 1) conducting a radiology exposure inventory from the perspective of the medical student; 2) student evaluation of the quality of the radiology exposures and suggestions for positive change; and 3) development of a framework to address the needs of medical students as it relates to radiology education in the undergraduate medical curriculum. Methods Research methodology and design for this qualitative study were described in detail in a previous article by Visscher et al [1] . Results Participants included 28 medical students; 18 were in medical school years 1 and 2 (preclerkship), and 10 were in years 3 and 4 (clerkship). Specific to the focus of this article, the data revealed 3 major findings: 1) multiple exposures to radiology exist, and they are received and valued differently depending on the medical student's stage of professional development; 2) medical students value radiology education and want their radiology exposure to be comprehensive and high quality; 3) Medical students have constructive suggestions for improving the quality of both formal and informal radiology exposures. Conclusions Performing a radiology exposure inventory from a medical student perspective is a useful way to explore how students receive and value radiology instruction. Medical students want a more comprehensive radiology education that can be summarized using the 5 C's of Radiology Education framework. The 5 C's (curriculum, coaching, collaborating, career and commitment) reflect medical students' desires to learn content that will support them in clinical practice, be supported in their professional development, and have the necessary information to make informed career decisions.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1959 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 184-185
Author(s):  
WOODROW W. MORRIS

In recent years it has been increasingly noted that health sciences, services and education may look to the behavioral sciences, particularly psychology, sociology and anthropology, for the techniques and methods which will lead to continued growth and progress in the health fields. In September, 1957, the Association of American Medical Colleges published The Appraisal of Applicants to Medical Schools, which is the report of the Fourth Teaching Institute of the Association. This Institute was one of two sponsored by the Association on the general topic, "Evaluation of the Student." The second was held at Atlantic City in the fall of 1957 under the sub-heading, "The Ecology of the Medical Student." In the first of these Institutes, in the words of George Packer Benny, "medical deans and teachers opened the doors of their medical schools to their university colleagues in psychology. . . ." and having done so found vigorous stimulation to seek answers along novel and different pathways in their considerations of the problems inherent in student evaluation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document