Systematic Review of the (Cost-)effectiveness of Spinal Cord Stimulation for People With Failed Back Surgery Syndrome

2008 ◽  
Vol 24 (9) ◽  
pp. 741-756 ◽  
Author(s):  
Malgorzata M. Bala ◽  
Robert P. Riemsma ◽  
John Nixon ◽  
Jos Kleijnen
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 66S-72S
Author(s):  
Jesse J. McClure ◽  
Bhargav D. Desai ◽  
Leonel Ampie ◽  
Wen You ◽  
Justin S. Smith ◽  
...  

Study Design: Systematic Review. Objectives: To review the literature surrounding the cost-effectiveness of implanting spinal cord stimulators for failed back surgery syndrome. Methods: A systematic review was conducted inclusive of all publications in the Medline database and Cochrane CENTRAL trials register within the last 10 years (English language only) assessing the cost-effectiveness of Spinal Cord Stimulator device implantation (SCSdi) in patients with previous lumbar fusion surgery. Results: The majority of reviewed publications that analyzed cost-effectiveness of SCSdi compared to conventional medical management (CMM) or re-operation in patients with failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) showed an overall increase in direct medical costs; these increased costs were found in nearly all cases to be offset by significant improvements in patient quality of life. The cost required to achieve these increases in quality adjusted life years (QALY) falls well below $25 000/QALY, a conservative estimate of willingness to pay. Conclusions: The data suggest that SCSdi provides both superior outcomes and a lower incremental cost: effectiveness ratio (ICER) compared to CMM and/or re-operation in patients with FBSS. These findings are in spite of the fact that the majority of studies reviewed were agnostic to the type of device or innervation utilized in SCSdi. Newer devices utilizing burst or higher frequency stimulation have demonstrated their superiority over traditional SCSdi via randomized clinical trials and may provide lower ICERs.


2010 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 463-469 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rod S. Taylor ◽  
James Ryan ◽  
Ruairi OʼDonnell ◽  
Sam Eldabe ◽  
Krishna Kumar ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol Volume 14 ◽  
pp. 3025-3032
Author(s):  
Elena Rojo ◽  
Concepción Pérez Hernández ◽  
Noelia Sánchez Martínez ◽  
A César Margarit ◽  
Tania Blanco Arias ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 677-678 ◽  
Author(s):  
Przemyslaw Maciej Waszak ◽  
Marta Modrić ◽  
Agnieszka Paturej ◽  
Stanislav M. Malyshev ◽  
Agnieszka Przygocka ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (21;1) ◽  
pp. E29-E43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae Hwan Cho

Background: Failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) is a frequently encountered disease entity following lumbar spinal surgery. Although many plausible reasons have been investigated, the exact pathophysiology remains unknown. Various medications, reoperations, interventions such as spinal cord stimulation, epidural adhesiolysis or epidural injection, exercise therapy, and psychotherapy have been suggested treatment options. However, the evidence of the clinical outcome for each treatment has not been clearly determined. Objectives: To evaluate the outcomes of each treatment modality and to present treatment guidelines for patients with FBSS. Study Design: A systematic review of each treatment regimen in patients with FBSS. Methods: The available literature regarding each modality for the treatment of refractory back pain or radiating pain for FBSS was reviewed. The quality assessment and the level of evidence were analyzed using the “Methodology Checklist” of SIGN (Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network). Data sources included relevant English language literature identified through searches of Pubmed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library from 1980 to Feb 2016. The primary outcome measure was pain relief of back pain or radiating pain for at least 3 months. Secondary outcome measures were improvement of the patient’s functional status, health-related quality of life, return to work, and reduction of opioid use. Results: Twenty-three articles were finally identified and reviewed. Based on our analysis, epidural adhesiolysis showed a short-term (6 to 24 months) effect (grade A) and spinal cord stimulation showed a mid-term (2 or 3 years) effect (grade B). Epidural injections showed a short-term (up to 2 years) effect (grade C). However, other treatments were recommended as grade D or inconclusive. Limitations: The limitations of this systematic review included the rarity of relevant literature. Conclusions: Epidural adhesiolysis or spinal cord stimulation can be effective in order to control chronic back pain or leg pain due to FBSS, and its recommendation grades are A and B, respectively. Other treatments showed poor or inconclusive evidence. Key words: Failed back surgery syndrome, post spinal surgery syndrome, chronic low back pain, post lumbar surgery syndrome, epidural adhesiolysis, spinal cord stimulation, epidural injection, revision


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document