scholarly journals The Electrically Evoked Auditory Change Complex Evoked by Temporal Gaps Using Cochlear Implants or Auditory Brainstem Implants in Children With Cochlear Nerve Deficiency

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 482-494 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuman He ◽  
Tyler C. McFayden ◽  
Bahar S. Shahsavarani ◽  
Holly F. B. Teagle ◽  
Matthew Ewend ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
pp. 014272372110422
Author(s):  
Jolien Faes ◽  
Joris Gillis ◽  
Steven Gillis

Auditory brainstem implantation (ABI) is a recent innovation in pediatric hearing restoration in children with a sensorineural hearing impairment. Only limited information is available on the spontaneous speech development of severe-to-profound congenitally hearing-impaired children who received an ABI. The purpose of this study was to investigate longitudinally the accuracy of ABI children’s word productions in spontaneous speech in comparison to the accuracy of children who received a cochlear implant and children with normal hearing. The data of this study consist of recordings of the spontaneous speech of the first three Dutch-speaking children living in Belgium who received an ABI. The children’s utterances were phonemically transcribed and for each word, the distance between the child’s production and the standard adult phonemic transcription was computed using the Levenshtein Distance as a metric. The same procedure was applied to the longitudinal data of the children with CI and the normally hearing children. The main result was that the Levenshtein Distance decreased in the three children with ABI but it remained significantly higher than that of children with typical hearing and cochlear implants matched on chronological age, hearing age, and lexicon size. In other words, the phonemic accuracy increased in the children with ABI but stayed well below that of children without hearing loss and children with cochlear implants. Moreover, the analyses revealed considerable individual variation between the children with ABI.


2014 ◽  
Vol 151 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. P93-P93
Author(s):  
Giacomo Colletti ◽  
Marco Mandala ◽  
Liliana Colletti ◽  
Vittorio Colletti

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (9) ◽  
pp. 21-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teresa A. Zwolan ◽  
Donna L. Sorkin

Cochlear implant candidacy and outcomes have advanced reflecting technology improvements, early identification, and better linkage between the surgical intervention and follow-up care. Children and adults with a range of hearing losses and other issues are now benefitting importantly from traditional cochlear implants as well as hybrid and auditory brainstem implants.


2011 ◽  
Vol 121 (9) ◽  
pp. 1979-1988 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig A. Buchman ◽  
Holly F. B. Teagle ◽  
Patricia A. Roush ◽  
Lisa R. Park ◽  
Debora Hatch ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 68-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aage R. Møller

The physiologic basis for cochlear and brainstem implants is discussed. It is concluded that the success of cochlear implants may be explained by assuming that the auditory system can adequately discriminate complex sounds, such as speech sounds, on the basis of their temporal structure when that is encoded in a few separate frequency bands to offer moderate separation of spectral components. The most important roles of the cochlea seems to be to prepare complex sounds for temporal analysis and to create separate channels through which information in different frequency bands is transmitted separately to higher nervous centers for decoding of temporal information. It is then pertinent to ask how many channels are needed. Because speech discrimination is very important, it is probably sufficient to use enough channels to separate formants from each other.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document