Sternocleidomastoid Muscle Flap in Esophageal Perforation Repair After Cervical Spine Surgery

2008 ◽  
Vol 21 (8) ◽  
pp. 597-605 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Benazzo ◽  
Roberto Spasiano ◽  
Giulia Bertino ◽  
Antonio Occhini ◽  
Patrizia Gatti
Spine ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 30 (20) ◽  
pp. E617-E622 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramon Navarro ◽  
Ramin Javahery ◽  
Frank Eismont ◽  
David J. Arnold ◽  
Nitin N. Bhatia ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 320-325 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elias Dakwar ◽  
Juan S. Uribe ◽  
Tapan A. Padhya ◽  
Fernando L. Vale

Object Delayed esophageal perforation is an uncommon but well-known complication after anterior cervical spine surgery. To the authors' knowledge there is no consensus to the optimal management of these patients in the literature. Methods The authors performed a retrospective review of 5 cases involving patients who were referred to their institution for the management of delayed esophageal perforations after undergoing anterior cervical spine surgery for a variety of reasons. Results The primary presenting symptom in all 5 patients was dysphagia. All patients initially underwent primary closure of the perforation with a sternocleidomastoid muscle flap. One patient required multiple surgeries to correct the perforation and ultimately required a free flap. Conclusions The authors recommend a multidisciplinary approach that involves otolaryngological surgeons as well as spine surgeons. They recommend removal of all anterior hardware and believe that it is essential to the treatment of esophageal perforations. If the patient does not have evidence of fusion at the time of presentation, then posterior cervical instrumentation is a viable alternative.


2004 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 246-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
B.C. Vrouenraets ◽  
H.D. Been ◽  
R. Brouwer-Mladin ◽  
M. Bruno ◽  
J.J.B. van Lanschot

2016 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 141-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Rory Goodwin ◽  
Christine E. Boone ◽  
James Pendleton ◽  
Benjamin D. Elder ◽  
Zhikui Wei ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (S3) ◽  
pp. 515-519 ◽  
Author(s):  
Man-Kyu Park ◽  
Dae-Chul Cho ◽  
Woo-Seok Bang ◽  
Kyoung-Tae Kim ◽  
Joo-Kyung Sung

Spine ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. 1051-1053 ◽  
Author(s):  
KENNETH E. NEWHOUSE ◽  
RONALD W. LINDSEY ◽  
CHARLES R. CLARK ◽  
JONAS LIEPONIS ◽  
MICHAEL J. MURPHY

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 285-291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sameer H. Halani ◽  
Griffin R. Baum ◽  
Jonathan P. Riley ◽  
Gustavo Pradilla ◽  
Daniel Refai ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVE Esophageal perforation is a rare but well-known complication of anterior cervical spine surgery. The authors performed a systematic review of the literature to evaluate symptomatology, direct causes, repair methods, and associated complications of esophageal injury. METHODS A PubMed search that adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines included relevant clinical studies and case reports (articles written in the English language that included humans as subjects) that reported patients who underwent anterior spinal surgery and sustained some form of esophageal perforation. Available data on clinical presentation, the surgical procedure performed, outcome measures, and other individual variables were abstracted from 1980 through 2015. RESULTS The PubMed search yielded 65 articles with 153 patients (mean age 44.7 years; range 14–85 years) who underwent anterior spinal surgery and sustained esophageal perforation, either during surgery or in a delayed fashion. The most common indications for initial anterior cervical spine surgery in these cases were vertebral fracture/dislocation (n = 77), spondylotic myelopathy (n = 15), and nucleus pulposus herniation (n = 10). The most commonly involved spinal levels were C5–6 (n = 51) and C6–7 (n = 39). The most common presenting symptoms included dysphagia (n =63), fever (n = 24), neck swelling (n = 23), and wound leakage (n = 18). The etiology of esophageal perforation included hardware failure (n = 31), hardware erosion (n = 23), and intraoperative injury (n = 14). The imaging modalities used to identify the esophageal perforations included modified contrast dye swallow studies, CT, endoscopy, plain radiography, and MRI. Esophageal repair was most commonly achieved using a modified muscle flap, as well as with primary closure. Outcomes measured in the literature were often defined by the time to oral intake following esophageal repair. Complications included pneumonia (n = 6), mediastinitis (n = 4), osteomyelitis (n = 3), sepsis (n = 3), acute respiratory distress syndrome (n = 2), and recurrent laryngeal nerve damage (n = 1). The mortality rate of esophageal perforation in the analysis was 3.92% (6 of 153 reported patients). CONCLUSIONS Esophageal perforation after anterior cervical spine surgery is a rare complication. This systematic review demonstrates that these perforations can be stratified into 3 categories based on the timing of symptomatic onset: intraoperative, early postoperative (within 30 days of anterior spinal surgery), and delayed. The most common source of esophageal injury is hardware erosion or migration, each of which may vary in their time to symptomatic manifestation.


2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 28S-36S ◽  
Author(s):  
Stuart H. Hershman ◽  
William A. Kunkle ◽  
Michael P. Kelly ◽  
Jacob M. Buchowski ◽  
Wilson Z. Ray ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document