Clinical and Electrophysiological Findings in Hereditary Inclusion Body Myopathy Compared With Sporadic Inclusion Body Myositis

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 190-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Kazamel ◽  
Eric J. Sorenson ◽  
Margherita Milone
1996 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 264-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valerie Askanas ◽  
W. King ◽  
Massimiliano Mirabella ◽  
Janis McFerrin ◽  
Karl H. Weisgraber ◽  
...  

Neurology ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 598-600 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony A. Amato ◽  
Robert T. Shebert

Sporadic inclusion body myositis (s-IBM) is characterized by late onset of slowly progressive weakness that involves the quadriceps and volar forearm muscles early in the course of the disease. There are hereditary forms of inclusion body myopathy (h-IBM) that histologically resemble s-IBM. The lack of inflammation on biopsy and the different ages at onset and patterns of muscle weakness distinguish s-IBM from h-IBM. We report twin brothers with the typical clinical and histologic features of s-IBM. The occurrence of s-IBM in these twins suggests the possibility of a genetic susceptibility to developing s-IBM.


2020 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. 1-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paulo Victor Sgobbi de Souza ◽  
Bruno de Mattos Lombardi Badia ◽  
Eduardo Augusto Gonçalves ◽  
Igor Braga Farias ◽  
Wladimir Bocca Vieira de Rezende Pinto ◽  
...  

Introduction. Inclusion body myositis represents the most common acquired myopathy in clinical practice in patients over 50 years old. Despite classical approach to this myopathy as an inflammatory disorder, a muscle degenerative disorder is now considered the main mechanism linked to these vacuolar myopathies. Hereditary presentations, although quite rare, represent an expanding and underrecognized group in clinical practice. Objective. perform a structured review of the current literature regarding hereditary inclusion body myopathies. Method. review of U.S. NLM PubMed and MEDLINE database of original articles, case reports, case series and review articles including the terms “inclusion body myositis” OR “inclusion body myopathy” AND “genetics” OR “hereditary”. Results. We present in this article a wide review regarding the main clinical, imaging, pathophysiological, genetic and therapeutic aspects related to hereditary myopathies linked to seven different clinical and genetic presentations (GNE, MATR3, VCP, SQSTM1, MYH2, HNRNPA2B1 and HNRNPA1). Conclusion. Hereditary inclusion body myopathy is associated with at least 7 distinct clinic and genetic monogenic forms.


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1112.1-1112
Author(s):  
R. Dejthevaporn ◽  
S. Shah ◽  
S. Wastling ◽  
J. Thornton ◽  
T. Yousry ◽  
...  

Background:Autoantibodies directed against cytosolic 5´-nucleotidase 1A (cN1A) have been identified in sporadic inclusion body myositis (sIBM) and other connective tissue diseases. Anti-cN1A antibodies may support the diagnostic process for sIBM as well as potentially provide clues for disease pathogenesis. Nevertheless, the utility of anti-cN1A autoantibody testing in clinical practice remains unclear and requires validation.Objectives:To investigate the association between anti-cN1A antibody status and clinical and MRI features in patients with sIBM.Methods:Data for patients fulfilling European Neuromuscular Centre (ENMC) 2011 criteria for sIBM were obtained from a natural history study database. Demographic, clinical, functional assessment, and muscle MRI data in patients with sIBM who had anti-cN1A autoantibody testing were collected and analysed. Comparisons between subgroups with anti-cN1A antibody status were performed with the Mann-Whitney or Fisher’s exact tests, as appropriate.Results:Forty-nine patients with sIBM had anti-cN1A autoantibody testing, of whom 17 (34.7%) were positive. Twelve patients had muscle MRI performed (seropositivity=5). Demographics, disease duration at antibody testing and overall disease pattern were closely matched in antibody positive and negative cohorts. Dysphagia was more common in the seropositive subgroup (77% vs 47%, p=0.070). Antibody positive patients were more severely affected with a trend to lower IBM functional rating scale (IBMFRS) scores (22.4±8.4 vs 26.7±6.4, p=0.09) with significantly worse ability to climb stairs (0.9±0.9, 1.7±1.1, p=0.02). On T1-weighted MRI more fatty infiltration was found in seropositive patients (Mercuri score: 3.0±0.8 vs 1.7±0.7, p=0.03). Short tau inversion recovery (STIR) hyperintensity was more conspicuous in seropositive patients (STIR extent score: 2.4±0.6 vs 1.4±0.7, p=0.04).Conclusion:There was a trend for more dysphagia and severity of dysphagia in seropositive patients. Differences in upper limb involvement were not seen according to IBMFRS and Medical Research Council (MRC) strength grades. Seropositive patients were more severely affected at the lower limb level, in terms of muscle weakness, physical function, MRI fatty infiltration and muscle inflammation. These results suggest positive antibody status is associated with a worse phenotype. These results have potential implications in clinical trials: whether antibody status influences treatment response should be assessed.Disclosure of Interests:Revadee Dejthevaporn: None declared, Sachit Shah: None declared, Stephen Wastling: None declared, John Thornton: None declared, Tarek Yousry: None declared, Jasper M Morrow: None declared, Pedro M Machado Consultant of: PMM: Abbvie, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche and UCB, Speakers bureau: PMM: Abbvie, BMS, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche and UCB


2011 ◽  
Vol 503 (3) ◽  
pp. 229-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Nogalska ◽  
Carla D’Agostino ◽  
W. King Engel ◽  
Valerie Askanas

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document