scholarly journals What Is the Prevalence of Cam Deformity After Prophylactic Pinning of the Contralateral Asymptomatic Hip in Unilateral Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis? A 10-year Minimum Followup Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 477 (5) ◽  
pp. 1111-1122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Till D. Lerch ◽  
Eduardo N. Novais ◽  
Florian Schmaranzer ◽  
Kai Ziebarth ◽  
Simon D. Steppacher ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 473 (4) ◽  
pp. 1212-1223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph E. Albers ◽  
Simon D. Steppacher ◽  
Pascal C. Haefeli ◽  
Stefan Werlen ◽  
Markus S. Hanke ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 478-486 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Z. Morris ◽  
Ryan T. Li ◽  
Raymond W. Liu ◽  
Michael J. Salata ◽  
James E. Voos

Cam morphology of the proximal femur is an abnormal contour of the femoral head-neck junction present in approximately 15% to 25% of the asymptomatic population, predominantly in males. Alpha angle and femoral head-neck offset ratio are 2 objective measurement tools that define cam morphology. Both primary (idiopathic) and secondary cam deformity develops through distinct mechanisms. The cause of primary (idiopathic) cam morphology remains incompletely understood. Mounting evidence suggests that idiopathic cam morphology develops during adolescence through alterations in the capital femoral epiphysis in response to participation in vigorous sporting activity. While the exact cause of epiphyseal extension has not yet been determined, preliminary evidence suggests that epiphyseal extension may reflect a short-term adaptive response to provide stability to the physis at the long-term cost of the development of cam morphology. Commonly recognized causes of secondary cam deformity include frank slipped capital femoral epiphysis, Legg-Calve-Perthes disease, and deformity after fracture of the proximal femur. Recent studies also support subtle slipped capital femoral epiphysis as a unique and silent cause of a small percentage of subjects previously thought to have idiopathic cam deformity.


2014 ◽  
Vol 85 (6) ◽  
pp. 585-591 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jakob Klit ◽  
Kasper Gosvig ◽  
Erland Magnussen ◽  
John Gelineck ◽  
Thomas Kallemose ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (7_suppl3) ◽  
pp. 2325967121S0009
Author(s):  
Clarabelle DeVries ◽  
Samuel G. Baird ◽  
James D. Bomar ◽  
Vidyadhar V. Upasani

Background: In situ screw fixation is the standard of care for the treatment of stable slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE), however, recent studies recommend treatment of all slip-related cam deformity to prevent degenerative changes due to femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Hypothesis/Purpose: The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate radiographic and patient reported outcomes after in situ screw fixation for stable SCFE with minimum 2-year follow-up. Methods: After obtaining IRB approval, we prospectively collected data on all consecutive stable SCFE patients who underwent in situ screw fixation at a single institution. Demographic information, Southwick slip angle (SSA) and alpha angle were recorded. The Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) were collected. Basic descriptive statistics, the Mann-Whitney test, and correlation analysis was performed. Results: Forty-four hips in 38 patients with an average pre-op SSA of 41.1±20.0˚ were studied. Cohort characteristics can be found in Table 1. We observed no surgical complications of the index procedure and no cases of avascular necrosis (AVN). Twelve hips (27%) went on to have a secondary procedure (SSA range: 34˚ to 101˚) on average 2.6±2.4 years after the index surgery. These were performed to correct residual deformity, limited hip range of motion, or symptomatic impingement; one patient (2 hips) was referred for total hip arthroplasty due to significant degenerative osteoarthritis at 7.8 years follow-up. There were five complications of the secondary procedures (three implant failures and two mal-positioned implants). Our mean post-op HOOS and WOMAC scores were 84.2±16.8 and 87.8±13.9, respectively. Severe slips were 19.3 times more likely to undergo a secondary procedure than mild and moderate slips (p<0.001), however we found no correlation between slip severity and patient reported outcomes (p>0.6). Conclusion: With minimum 2-year follow-up, 27% of patients went on to require a secondary surgery after in situ screw fixation for stable SCFE. Patient reported outcomes did not correlate with slip severity (p>0.6) but were found to be significantly higher in SCFE patients that did not require a secondary procedure (p=0.023). Prophylactic treatment of all slip-related cam deformity was not found to be necessary in this prospective cohort. While in situ screw fixation can be used to safely treat mild to moderate stable slips, patients with moderate to severe stable slips may require secondary surgery and have a higher complication rate with worse patient reported outcomes. Level 2 [Table: see text]


PEDIATRICS ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 137 (Supplement 3) ◽  
pp. 557A-557A
Author(s):  
Stephanie Chu ◽  
Rachel Y Goldstein ◽  
Erin Dawicki ◽  
Herman Luther ◽  
Lindsay Andras ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
Ahmed Akila ◽  
Hossam Khairy ◽  
Mohamed Attia ◽  
ahmed elmalt

1998 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 139-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Umans ◽  
Melissa S. Liebling ◽  
Linda Moy ◽  
Nogah Haramati ◽  
Neil J. Macy ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document