scholarly journals PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF IN SITU SCREW FIXATION FOR STABLE SLIPPED CAPITAL FEMORAL EPIPHYSIS

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (7_suppl3) ◽  
pp. 2325967121S0009
Author(s):  
Clarabelle DeVries ◽  
Samuel G. Baird ◽  
James D. Bomar ◽  
Vidyadhar V. Upasani
Keyword(s):  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis ◽  
Alpha Angle ◽  
Secondary Surgery ◽  
Secondary Procedure ◽  
Cam Deformity ◽  
Patient Reported

Background: In situ screw fixation is the standard of care for the treatment of stable slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE), however, recent studies recommend treatment of all slip-related cam deformity to prevent degenerative changes due to femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Hypothesis/Purpose: The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate radiographic and patient reported outcomes after in situ screw fixation for stable SCFE with minimum 2-year follow-up. Methods: After obtaining IRB approval, we prospectively collected data on all consecutive stable SCFE patients who underwent in situ screw fixation at a single institution. Demographic information, Southwick slip angle (SSA) and alpha angle were recorded. The Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) were collected. Basic descriptive statistics, the Mann-Whitney test, and correlation analysis was performed. Results: Forty-four hips in 38 patients with an average pre-op SSA of 41.1±20.0˚ were studied. Cohort characteristics can be found in Table 1. We observed no surgical complications of the index procedure and no cases of avascular necrosis (AVN). Twelve hips (27%) went on to have a secondary procedure (SSA range: 34˚ to 101˚) on average 2.6±2.4 years after the index surgery. These were performed to correct residual deformity, limited hip range of motion, or symptomatic impingement; one patient (2 hips) was referred for total hip arthroplasty due to significant degenerative osteoarthritis at 7.8 years follow-up. There were five complications of the secondary procedures (three implant failures and two mal-positioned implants). Our mean post-op HOOS and WOMAC scores were 84.2±16.8 and 87.8±13.9, respectively. Severe slips were 19.3 times more likely to undergo a secondary procedure than mild and moderate slips (p<0.001), however we found no correlation between slip severity and patient reported outcomes (p>0.6). Conclusion: With minimum 2-year follow-up, 27% of patients went on to require a secondary surgery after in situ screw fixation for stable SCFE. Patient reported outcomes did not correlate with slip severity (p>0.6) but were found to be significantly higher in SCFE patients that did not require a secondary procedure (p=0.023). Prophylactic treatment of all slip-related cam deformity was not found to be necessary in this prospective cohort. While in situ screw fixation can be used to safely treat mild to moderate stable slips, patients with moderate to severe stable slips may require secondary surgery and have a higher complication rate with worse patient reported outcomes. Level 2 [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Midfoot Arthrodesis Using Different Fixation Methods

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011418S0002
Author(s):  
Lorena Bejarano-Pineda ◽  
Jeannie Huh ◽  
James DeOrio ◽  
Alexander Lampley ◽  
Mark Easley
Keyword(s):  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Plate Fixation ◽  
Fixation Methods ◽  
First Metatarsal ◽  
Radiographic Outcomes ◽  
Fixation Group ◽  
Metatarsal Angle ◽  
Patient Reported

Category: Midfoot/Forefoot Introduction/Purpose: Midfoot arthritis is a disabling condition, causing chronic foot pain and functional disability. The goals of midfoot arthrodesis are to a plantigrade, stable, and pain-free foot. The procedure can be technically demanding and associated with a number of complications. The use of midfoot-specific plate fixation has become more popular as an alternative to screw-only fixation. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes following midfoot arthrodesis using different fixation methods. Methods: This was a retrospective study of all midfoot arthrodeses performed at a single institution between January 2005 and December 2014. Patients qualified if they had a minimum of 12 months follow-up, specifically with patient-reported outcomes. Demographic and surgical information were collected. Final post-operative outcomes were reviewed and consisted of patient-reported functional measures, union rate, complications, and radiographic outcomes. Patient-reported functional measures included the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) midfoot scale, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, and Lower Extremity Functional Score (LEFS). Radiographic outcomes included alignment in the antero-posterior (AP) and lateral views, as measured by the talo-first metatarsal angle during the pre-operative and final follow-up visits. Outcomes were compared among the following groups: Screw fixation group (SFG), plate fixation group (PFG), and combined fixation group (CFG), which had screw and plate fixation. Results: A total of 79 midfoot fusions in 75 patients had a mean follow-up of 61 months (range 13-122) with patient-reported outcome measures. At final follow-up, the SFG had a higher median LEFS (72.5 versus 53 in the PFG and 56 in the CFG; p>0.1) and a higher mean AOFAS score (87 versus 78 in the PFG and 77 in the CFG; p>0.15). The complication and nonunion rate was highest in the PFG, with 13 (50%) and 4 (50%) cases, respectively; however, the differences were not statistically significant. The talo-first metatarsal angle improved in all three groups from a median of 6.4 degrees pre-operatively to 3.9 degrees on final post-operative imaging. Conclusion: Although not statistically significant, there was a trend towards higher patient-reported outcomes, union rate, and less complication rate in midfoot fusions treated with screw fixation compared to plate fixation and combined fixation. There was no difference in radiographic correction among the difference fixation methods. Although new techniques and implants continue to be introduced, we found no significant difference in outcomes when compared to the traditional technique of screw fixation.

scholarly journals Long-term evolution of slipped capital femoral epiphysis treated by in situ fixation: a 26 years follow-up of 11 hips

2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jérôme Murgier ◽  
Jérôme Sales de Gauzy ◽  
Fouad C. Jabbour ◽  
Xavier Bayle Iniguez ◽  
Etienne Cavaignac ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Options ◽  
Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis ◽  
Alpha Angle ◽  
Hip Osteoarthritis ◽  
Slip Angle ◽  
Radiographic Outcomes ◽  
Oxford Hip Score

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SFCE) may lead to femoro acetabular impingement and long-term function impairment, depending on initial displacement and treatment. There are several therapeutic options which include <em>in situ f</em>ixation (ISF). The objective of this study was to evaluate long-term functional and radiographic outcomes of patients with SFCE treated with ISF. We conducted a single-center, retrospective study evaluating the clinical and radiographic outcomes of SCFE<em> in situ</em> fixation with a mean follow-up of 26 years (10- 47). Analysis of preoperative and last follow up radiographs was performed. The functional status of the hip was evaluated according to the Oxford hip score-12 and the radiographic osteoarthritis stage was rated according to Tönnis classification. Signs of femoro acetabular impingement were sought. Ten patients (11 hips) were included. The average initial slip was 33.5° (10-62). At final follow up, the average Oxford hip score was 19.3 (12-37), it was good for groups who had a small initial slip (16.7) or moderate (17) and fair for the severe group (27). Average Tönnis grade was 1.3 (0- 3). The average alpha angle was 65.3° (50- 80°). Femoro acetabular impingement was likely in 100% of patients with severe slip, in 50% of patients with moderate slip and in 33% of patients with a slight slip. <em>In situ</em> fixation generated poor functional results, substantial hip osteoarthritis and potential femoro acetabular impingement in moderate to severe SCFE’s. However, in cases with minor displacement, functional and radiographic results are satisfactory. The cut off seems to be around 30° slip angle, above which other treatment options should be considered.

scholarly journals Evolution of slipped capital femoral epiphysis after in situ screw fixation at a mean 11years’ follow-up: A 222 case series

2015 ◽  
Vol 101 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Nectoux ◽  
J. Décaudain ◽  
F. Accadbled ◽  
A. Hamel ◽  
N. Bonin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis ◽  
Case Series

Slip Progression after in Situ Screw Fixation of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis

PEDIATRICS ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 137 (Supplement 3) ◽  
pp. 557A-557A
Author(s):  
Stephanie Chu ◽  
Rachel Y Goldstein ◽  
Erin Dawicki ◽  
Herman Luther ◽  
Lindsay Andras ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis

Individualized cancer follow-up supported by electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes: Development and evaluation (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sissel Ravn ◽  
Henriette Vind Thaysen ◽  
Lene Seibaek ◽  
Victor Jilbert Verwaal ◽  
Lene Hjerrild Iversen
Keyword(s):  
Ct Scan ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Cost Benefit Analysis ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
European Organization ◽  
Individualized Care ◽  
Patient Reported

BACKGROUND Cancer survivors experience unmet needs during follow-up. Besides recurrence, a follow-up includes detection of late side effects, rehabilitation, palliation and individualized care. OBJECTIVE We aimed to describe the development and evaluate the feasibility of an intervention providing individualized cancer follow-up supported by electronic patient-reported outcomes (e-PRO). METHODS The study was carried out as an interventional study at a Surgical and a Gynecological Department offering complex cancer surgery and follow-up for advanced cancer. The e-PRO screened for a priori defined clinical important symptoms and needs providing individualized follow-up. We included following questionnaires in the e-PRO; the general European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 and the EORTC validated for colorectal and ovarian cancer patients. To support individualization, we included three prioritized issues of the patient’s preference in each e-PRO. The response-algorithm was aggregated based on the severity of the patient’s response. To ensure the sensitivity of the e-PRO, we performed semi-structured interviews with five patients. All clinicians (surgeons and gynecologists) performing the consultations reviewed the e-PRO. The evaluation was divided in two, 1)The feasibility was assessed by a)Patients’ response rate of the e-PRO, b)Number of follow-up visits documenting the use of e-PRO and c)Patients’ prioritized issues prior to the consultation(‘yes’ / ‘no’), and after the follow-up 2)Patients assessment of a)The need and purpose of the follow-up visit and b)the support provided during the follow-up visit. RESULTS In total, 187 patients were included in the study, of which 73%(n=136/187) patients responded to the e-PRO and were subjected to an individualized follow-up. The e-PRO was documented as applied in 79% of the follow-up visits. In total, 23% of the prioritized issues did not include a response. Stratified by time since surgery, significantly more patients did not fill out a prioritized issue had a follow-up >6 months since surgery. In total, 72 % follow-up visits were evaluated to be necessary in order to discuss the outcome of the CT scan, symptoms, and/or prioritized issues. Contrary, 19% of the follow-up visits were evaluated to be necessary only to discuss the result of the CT scan. A range from 19.3–56.3% of patients assessed the follow-up visit to provide support with respect to physical (42% of patients), mental (56%), sexual (19%) or dietary (27%) issues. Further, a range from 34–60% of the patients reported that they did not need support regarding physical (43% of patients), mental (34%), sexual (63%) or dietary (57%) issues. CONCLUSIONS An individualized follow-up based on e-PRO is feasible, and support most patients surgically treated for advanced cancer. However, results indicate that follow-up based on e-PRO may not be beneficial for all patients and circumstances. A thorough cost-benefit analysis may be warranted before implementation in routine clinic.

Minimum 10-Year Outcomes of Primary Arthroscopic Transosseous-Equivalent Double-Row Rotator Cuff Repair

2021 ◽  
pp. 036354652110154
Author(s):  
Adam M. Johannsen ◽  
Justin W. Arner ◽  
Bryant P. Elrick ◽  
Philip-C. Nolte ◽  
Dylan R. Rakowski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Double Row ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Cuff Repair

Background: Modern rotator cuff repair techniques demonstrate favorable early and midterm outcomes, but long-term results have yet to be reported. Purpose: To determine 10-year outcomes and survivorship after arthroscopic double-row transosseous-equivalent (TOE) rotator cuff repair. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence 4. Methods: The primary TOE rotator cuff repair procedure was performed using either a knotted suture bridge or knotless tape bridge technique on a series of patients with 1 to 3 tendon full-thickness rotator cuff tears involving the supraspinatus. Only patients who were 10 years postsurgery were included. Patient-reported outcomes were collected pre- and postoperatively, including American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), shortened version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH), and satisfaction. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed. Failure was defined as progression to revision surgery. Results: A total of 91 shoulders (56 men, 31 women) were included between October 2005 and December 2009. Mean follow-up was 11.5 years (range, 10.0-14.1 years). Of 91 shoulders, 5 (5.5%) failed and required revision surgery. Patient-reported outcomes for patients who survived were known for 80% (69/86). Outcomes scores at final follow-up were as follows: ASES, 93.1 ± 10.8; SANE, 87.5 ± 14.2; QuickDASH, 11.1 ± 13.5; and SF-12 physical component summary (PCS), 49.2 ± 10.1. There were statistically significant declines in ASES, SANE, and SF-12 PCS from the 5-year to 10-year follow-up, but none of these changes met the minimally clinically important difference threshold. Median satisfaction at final follow-up was 10 (range, 3-10). From this cohort, Kaplan-Meier survivorship demonstrated a 94.4% survival rate at a minimum of 10 years. Conclusion: Arthroscopic TOE rotator cuff repair demonstrates high patient satisfaction and low revision rates at a mean follow-up of 11.5 years. This information may be directly utilized in surgical decision making and preoperative patient counseling regarding the longevity of modern double-row rotator cuff repair.

scholarly journals Sex differences in outcomes after arthroscopic bankart repair

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. e000965
Author(s):  
Natalie A Lowenstein ◽  
Peter J Ostergaard ◽  
Daniel B Haber ◽  
Kirsten D Garvey ◽  
Elizabeth G Matzkin
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Sex Differences ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Strength Function ◽  
Bankart Repair ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Males And Females

ObjectivesRisk factors for anterior shoulder dislocation include young age, contact activities and male sex. The influence of sex on patient-reported outcomes of arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) is unclear, with few studies reporting potential differences. This study’s purpose was to compare patient-reported outcomes of males and females following ABR.MethodsProspectively collected data was analysed for 281 patients (males: 206, females: 75) after ABR with preoperative, 1-year and 2-year follow-up responses. The Wilcoxon signed-rank and χ2 tests, preoperative, 1 year and 2 year follow-up results were examined to determine differences of scores in males versus females.ResultsNo statistically significant sex differences were observed in Simple Shoulder Test (SST), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) or Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE) Scores at 1-year or 2-year follow-up. Females had lower Veterans RAND 12-item health survey (VR-12) mental health subscores at 2-year follow-up (females: 52.3±9.0, males: 55.8±7.6, p=0.0016). Females were more likely to report that treatment had ‘exceeded expectations’ at 2-year follow-up regarding motion, strength, function and normal sports activities.ConclusionResults of study demonstrate that ABR has similar outcomes for both males and females. There were no statistically significant sex-related differences in SST, ASES, VAS or SANE scores following ABR. VR-12 mental health subscores showed a minimal difference at 2-year follow-up, with lower scores in females.Level of evidenceRetrospective cohort study; level II.

scholarly journals Strain Elastography and Tendon Response to an Exercise Program in Patients With Supraspinatus Tendinopathy: An Exploratory Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 232596712096518
Author(s):  
Karen Brage ◽  
Birgit Juul-Kristensen ◽  
John Hjarbaek ◽  
Eleanor Boyle ◽  
Per Kjaer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Structural Changes ◽  
Supraspinatus Tendon ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Minimal Detectable Change ◽  
Detectable Change ◽  
Tendon Stiffness ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Tendon Thickness

Background: Shoulder pain is common, with a lifetime prevalence of up to 67%. Evidence is conflicting in relation to imaging findings and pain in the shoulder. Sonoelastography can be used to estimate tissue stiffness and may be a clinically relevant technique for diagnosing and monitoring tendon healing. Purpose: To evaluate changes in supraspinatus tendon stiffness using strain elastography (SEL) and associations with changes in patient-reported outcomes, supraspinatus tendon thickness, and grade of tendinopathy after 12 weeks of unilateral shoulder exercises in patients with supraspinatus tendinopathy. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: A total of 23 patients with unilateral clinical supraspinatus tendinopathy performed 12 weeks of “standard care” exercises. At baseline and follow-up, supraspinatus tendon stiffness was measured bilaterally using SEL and compared with tendinopathy grading on magnetic resonance imaging scans and tendon thickness measured using conventional ultrasound. Patient-reported outcome measures included physical function and symptoms from the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire and pain rating (visual analog scale). Results: No significant changes in SEL within or between groups (asymptomatic vs symptomatic tendon) were seen. All patient-reported outcomes showed significant improvement from baseline to follow-up, but with no change in tendinopathy grading and tendon thickness. No significant differences in the proportion of patients changing above the minimal detectable change in SEL and PROM were seen, except for discomfort while sleeping. Conclusion: Despite no significant within-group or between-group changes in SEL, significant improvements were found in patient-reported outcomes. An acceptable agreement between patients changing above the minimal detectable change in SEL and patient-reported outcome measure was seen. Further studies should explore the use of SEL to detect changes after tendon repair and long-term training potentially in subgroups of different tendinopathy phases. Clinical Relevance: In the short term, structural changes in supraspinatus tendons could not be visualized using SEL, indicating that a longer time span should be expected in order to observe structural changes, which should be considered before return to sports. Subgrouping based on stage of tendinopathy may also be important in order to evaluate changes over time with SEL among patients with supraspinatus tendinopathy. Registration: NCT03425357 ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document