CORR Insights®: What Are Practical Surgical Anatomic Landmarks and Distances from Relevant Neurologic Landmarks in Cadavers for the Posterior Approach in Shoulder Arthroplasty?

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric W. Carson
Author(s):  
Chitranjan S Ranawat ◽  
Morteza Meftah ◽  
Akhilesh Yadav ◽  
Amar S Ranawat

Author(s):  
R. Michael Greiwe ◽  
Sarah A. Witzig ◽  
Brandon J. Kohrs ◽  
Michael S. Bahk ◽  
Misti A. Hill ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 128 (5) ◽  
pp. 420-425
Author(s):  
Michael Z. Lerner ◽  
Sherry A. Downie ◽  
Melin Tan-Geller

Objective: This anatomic study considers the feasibility of a posterior endoscopic approach to the cricoarytenoid joint (CAJ) by describing relationships between readily identifiable anatomic landmarks and the posterior CAJ space in cadaver larynges. Study Design: Anatomic study. Methods: Six adult cadaver larynges (2 male, 4 female) were studied. Digital calipers were used for measurements, and Image J software was used for angle calculations. All cricoarytenoid joints were injected with colored gel via a posterior approach using a 27-gauge needle. Results: The average age of the larynges studied was 78.7 ± 10 years. The average posterior CAJ space (pCAJs) length measured 4.95 ± 0.9 mm. The average distance from the superior aspect of the midline cricoid lamina (MCL) to the center of pCAJs and the corniculate cartilage (CC) to the center of the pCAJs were 8.35 ± 1.5 mm and 14.54 ± 1.9 mm, respectively. The average pCAJs angle of declination (AD) from the horizontal plane was 54° ± 6.2°. All 12 cricoarytenoid joints were successfully injected with colored gel via a posterior approach. Conclusions: The posterior CAJ space can be located surgically using readily identifiable anatomic landmarks. An understanding of this posterior CAJ anatomy may allow for more consistent intra-articular injection and support the development of other CAJ procedures for a range of disorders of vocal fold motion or malposition.


Orthopedics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. e15-e20
Author(s):  
R. Michael Greiwe ◽  
Misti A. Hill ◽  
Maxwell S. Boyle ◽  
Joseph Nolan

Swiss Surgery ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 143-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Launois ◽  
Maddern ◽  
Tay

The detailed knowledge of the segmental anatomy of the liver has led to a rapid evolution in resectional surgery based on the intrahepatic distribution of the portal trinity (the hepatic artery, hepatic duct and portal vein). The classical intrafascial or extrahepatic approach is to isolate the appropriate branch of the portal vein, hepatic artery and the hepatic duct, outside the liver substance. Another method, the extrafascial approach, is to dissect the whole sheath of the pedicle directly after division of a substantial amount of the hepatic tissue to reach the pedicle, which is surrounded by a sheath, derived from Glisson's capsule. This Glissonian sheath encloses the portal trinity. In the transfissural or intrahepatic approach, these sheaths can be approached either anteriorly (after division of the main, right or umbilical fissure) or posteriorly from behind the porta hepatis. We describe the technique for approaching the Glissonian sheath and hence the hepatic pedicle structures and their branches by the intrahepatic posterior approach that allows early delineation of the liver segment without the need for ancillary techniques. In addition, the indications for the use of this technique in the technical and oncologic settings are also discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document