Purpose To assess the potential efficacy of broad internal limiting membrane peeling with adjunctive plasma–thrombin instillation to treat large macular holes and to make qualitative comparisons to internal limiting membrane peeling without adjunctive treatment and internal limiting membrane peeling with inverted and free internal limiting membrane flaps. Methods A systematic literature review and a retrospective case series. Participants in the case series (N = 39) had idiopathic macular holes larger than 400 µm as measured on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography and underwent pars plana vitrectomy, internal limiting membrane peeling, placement of autologous plasma and bovine thrombin over the hole, and gas tamponade. Repeat imaging and clinical data were collected from 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Results Macular hole closure rate was 97%; 82% had U-type closures. At 12 months, 11% had defects in the external limiting membrane and 22% in the ellipsoid zone. This closure rate is similar to prior studies of internal limiting membrane flaps, while the U-type closure rate and retinal layer restoration compare favorably to those reported for internal limiting membrane peeling alone and internal limiting membrane flaps; 75% experienced a three-line improvement in visual acuity by 6 months, which exceeds results by either method. Conclusion Plasma–thrombin instillation over macular holes may be a less-complicated alternative adjunct to internal limiting membrane flaps that can achieve similar outcomes when combined with internal limiting membrane peeling.
Long-term outcomes of free internal limiting membrane transplant for unclosed macular holes after extensive internal limiting membrane peeling and silicone oil tamponade: a report of two cases
