Epimacular proliferative response following internal limiting membrane peeling for idiopathic macular holes

2003 ◽  
Vol 242 (2) ◽  
pp. 177-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Riyo Uemoto ◽  
Shuichi Yamamoto ◽  
Shinobu Takeuchi
2020 ◽  
pp. 112067212090639 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tommaso Rossi ◽  
Carlandrea Trillo ◽  
Guido Ripandelli

Purpose: To report a series of recurrent idiopathic macular holes treated by means of a free autologous internal limiting membrane flap and compare visual and anatomic results to a control group undergoing further internal limiting membrane peeling and novel gas tamponade. Methods: Retrospective surgical series of 15 consecutive patients receiving autologous internal limiting membrane flap compared to 14 patients operated on for internal limiting membrane peeling enlargement. Autologous internal limiting membrane flap was created after brilliant blue G staining, internal limiting membrane lifting, perfluorocarbon bubble injection and creation of a wide internal limiting membrane free flap translocated underneath perfluorocarbon liquid, to the macular hole bed. Both groups were tamponated with 20% SF6 and positioned face down for 4 h a day for 3 days. Results: Macular hole closed in 14/15 (93.3%) patients of the autologous internal limiting membrane group and 9/14 (64.2%) controls (p < 0.05). Visual acuity increased from 0.05 ± 0.03 to 0.23 ± 0.13 Snellen in the autologous internal limiting membrane group and from 0.05 ± 0.03 to 0.14 ± 0.10 Snellen of controls (p < 0.05 for both). Vision of the autologous internal limiting membrane group improved more than controls at 1 month (p = 0.043) and 3 months (p = 0.045). Inner segment/outer segment interruption at 3 months was smaller in the autologous internal limiting membrane group than controls, reducing from 1230 ± 288 µm at baseline to 611 ± 245 and 547 ± 204 µm at 3 months versus 1196 ± 362, 745 ± 222 and 705 ± 223 µm, respectively (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Autologous internal limiting membrane flap can effectively close recurrent idiopathic macular holes with a higher closure rate, smaller residual inner segment/outer segment line interruption and higher visual acuity at 3 months than previous standard of care.


Retina ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (11) ◽  
pp. 2127-2133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Declan C. Murphy ◽  
Will Fostier ◽  
Jon Rees ◽  
David H. Steel

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alfonso L. Sabater ◽  
Álvaro Velázquez-Villoria ◽  
Miguel A. Zapata ◽  
Marta S. Figueroa ◽  
Marta Suárez-Leoz ◽  
...  

Purpose. To evaluate macular retinal ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness changes after Brilliant Blue G-assisted internal limiting membrane peeling for idiopathic macular hole repair using a high-resolution spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT).Methods. 32 eyes from 32 patients with idiopathic macular holes who underwent vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling between January 2011 and July 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. GCIPL thickness was measured before surgery, and at one month and at six months after surgery. Values obtained from automated and semimanual SD-OCT segmentation analysis were compared (Cirrus HD-OCT, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA).Results. No significant differences were found between average GCIPL thickness values between preoperative and postoperative analysis. However, statistical significant differences were found in GCIPL thickness at the temporal macular quadrants at six months after surgery. Quality measurement analysis performed by automated segmentation revealed a significant number of segmentation errors. Semimanual segmentation slightly improved the quality of the results.Conclusion. SD-OCT analysis of GCIPL thickness found a significant reduction at the temporal macular quadrants at 6 months after Brilliant Blue G-assisted internal limiting membrane peeling for idiopathic macular hole.


Retina ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 1132-1136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tobias Brockmann ◽  
Claudia Steger ◽  
Martin Weger ◽  
Andreas Wedrich ◽  
Anton Haas

Retina ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (7) ◽  
pp. 1306-1314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Morescalchi ◽  
Andrea Russo ◽  
Hassan Bahja ◽  
Elena Gambicorti ◽  
Anna Cancarini ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raffaele Nuzzi ◽  
Federico Tridico

The main treatment available for idiopathic macular holes is represented by pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling. However, late-stage macular holes are affected by a higher risk of surgical failure. Although adjuvant techniques can be employed, a satisfactory functional recovery is difficult to achieve in refractory macular holes. Given their neuroprotective and antiapoptotic properties, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) may represent an appealing approach to treat these extreme cases. The purpose of this review is to highlight the findings regarding healing mechanisms exerted by mesenchymal stem cells and preliminary application in cases of refractory macular holes. When compared with MSCs, MSC-derived exosomes may represent a feasible alternative, given their reduced risk of undesired proliferation and easiness of use.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document