scholarly journals Graft Shrinkage and Survival Rate of Implants After Sinus Floor Elevation Using a Nanocrystalline Hydroxyapatite Embedded in Silica Gel Matrix

2012 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 213-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc El Hage ◽  
Semaan Abi Najm ◽  
Mvark Bischof ◽  
Rabah Nedir ◽  
Jean-Pierre Carrel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Survival Rate ◽  
Silica Gel ◽  
Sinus Floor Elevation ◽  
Nanocrystalline Hydroxyapatite ◽  
Sinus Floor ◽  
Graft Shrinkage

scholarly journals Short implants (≤6 mm) versus longer implants with sinus floor elevation in atrophic posterior maxilla: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. e029826 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qi Yan ◽  
Xinyu Wu ◽  
Meiying Su ◽  
Fang Hua ◽  
Bin Shi
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Sinus Floor Elevation ◽  
Moderate Quality ◽  
Short Implants ◽  
Posterior Maxilla ◽  
Sinus Floor ◽  
Quality Evidence

ObjectivesTo compare the use of short implants (≤6 mm) in atrophic posterior maxilla versus longer implants (≥10 mm) with sinus floor elevation.DesignA systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomised controlled trials (RCTs).Data sourcesElectronic searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane CENTRAL. Retrospective and prospective hand searches were also performed.Eligibility criteriaRCTs comparing short implants (≤6 mm) and longer implants (≥10 mm) with sinus floor elevation were included. Outcome measures included implant survival (primary outcome), marginal bone loss (MBL), complications and patient satisfaction.Data extraction and synthesisRisks of bias in and across studies were evaluated. Meta-analysis, subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were undertaken. Quality of evidence was assessed according to Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation.ResultsA total of seven RCTs involving 310 participants were included. No significant difference in survival rate was found for 1–3 years follow-up (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.04, p=0.74, I²=0%, moderate-quality evidence) or for 3 years or longer follow-up (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.04, p=0.79, I²=0%, moderate-quality evidence). However, short implants (≤6 mm) showed significantly less MBL in 1–3 years follow-up (MD=−0.13 mm, 95% CI −0.21 to 0.05; p=0.001, I²=87%, low-quality evidence) and in 3 years or longer follow-up (MD=−0.25 mm, 95% CI −0.40 to 0.10; p=0.001, I²=0%, moderate-quality evidence). In addition, short implant (≤6 mm) resulted in fewer postsurgery reaction (RR 0.11, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.31, p<0.001, I²=40%, moderate-quality evidence) and sinus perforation or infection (RR 0.11, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.63, p=0.01, I²=0%, moderate-quality evidence).ConclusionsFor atrophic posterior maxilla, short implants (≤6 mm) are a promising alternative to sinus floor elevation, with comparable survival rate, less MBL and postsurgery reactions. Additional high-quality studies are needed to evaluate the long-term effectiveness of short implants (≤6 mm).Trial registeration numberThe protocol has been registered at PROSPERO (CRD42018103531).

Does sinus floor elevation in the presence of Schneiderian membrane pathology increase therisk of membrane perforation and implant failure rate?

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying Fang ◽  
Ye Bi ◽  
Mubarak Mashrah ◽  
Yucheng Su ◽  
Linhu Ge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Survival Rate ◽  
Implant Failure ◽  
Pathological Changes ◽  
Implant Survival ◽  
Sinus Floor Elevation ◽  
Schneiderian Membrane ◽  
Normal Sinus ◽  
Membrane Perforation ◽  
Sinus Floor ◽  
Mucosal Thickening

Schneiderian membrane (SM) thickness &gt;2mm is regarded to be a pathological mucosal change. The aim of the current study is to answer the question” Does presence of pathological changes in the SM increase the risk of sinus perforation during surgical sinus floor elevation (SFE)?” An electronic database (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Chinese database) were systemically searched for the studies published until February 2020. Randomized and non-randomized studies that reported the incidence of SM perforation in patients with SM pathology (antral pseudocyst or mucosal thickening) during SFE. The outcome measures were the incidence of SM perforation and implant survival rate. The pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals and the Fixed-effects model were calculated. P-value ≤ 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Eighteen studies with a total of 1542 patients and 1797 SFE were included. Statistically insignificant difference in the incidence of SM perforation was observed between the normal-appearing sinus and thickened sinus mucosa (Fixed; OR, 0.896; 95%CI, 0.504 - 1.59; P =0.707, I 2 =32%). The rate of SM perforation in the normal sinus, mucosal thickening, and antral pseudocysts was 14%, 6%, and 6% respectively. The Implant survival rate was 98% in the normal sinus, and 100% in antral pseudocyst and mucosal thickening. SM thickening or antral pseudocyst did not increase the risk of membrane perforation and implant failure rates. Future RCTs are needed to evaluate the risk of the presence of pathological changes in the SM on the failure of the bone augmentation and dental implant.

scholarly journals The survival rate of transcrestal sinus floor elevation combined with short implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhe-Zhen Lin ◽  
Yan-Qing Jiao ◽  
Zhang-Yan Ye ◽  
Ge-Ge Wang ◽  
Xi Ding
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Bone Volume ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Sinus Floor Elevation ◽  
Short Implants ◽  
Posterior Maxilla ◽  
Sinus Floor

Abstract Background Currently, insufficient bone volume always occurs in the posterior maxilla which makes implantation difficult. Short implants combined with transcrestal sinus floor elevation (TSFE) may be an option to address insufficient bone volume. Purpose The clinical performance of short implants combined with TSFE was compared with that of conventional implants combined with TSFE according to the survival rate. Method In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we followed the Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines. Articles were identified through PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and manual searching. Eligibility criteria included clinical human studies. The quality assessment was performed according to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines. The odds ratio (OR) with its confidence interval (CI) was considered the essential outcome for estimating the effect of short implants combined with TSFE. Results The registration number is INPLASY202050092. Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria, including 1 cohort study and 10 cross-sectional studies. With respect to the 1-year survival rate, no significant effect was observed between short implants (length ≤ 8 mm) and conventional implants combined with TSFE (I2=0%, OR=1.04, 95% CI: 0.55-1.96). Similarly, no difference was seen between the two groups regarding the survival rate during the healing period (I2=10%, OR=0.74, 95% CI: 0.28-1.97) and 3-year loading (OR=1.76, 95% CI: 0.65-4.74). Conclusion There was no evidence that the survival rate of short implants combined with TSFE was lower or higher than that of conventional implants combined with TSFE when the residual bone height was poor and the implant protrusion length of short implants was less than or similar to conventional implants. Nevertheless, the results should be interpreted cautiously due to the lack of random controlled trials in our meta-analysis.

Axial Triangle of the Maxillary Sinus, and its Surgical Implication With the Position of Maxillary Sinus Septa During Sinus Floor Elevation: A CBCT Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 415-422
Author(s):  
Junho Jung ◽  
Jung Soo Park ◽  
Seoung-Jin Hong ◽  
Gyu-Tae Kim ◽  
Yong-Dae Kwon
Keyword(s):  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Lateral Sinus ◽  
Sinus Floor Elevation ◽  
Second Molar ◽  
Sinus Wall ◽  
Posterior Maxilla ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Sinus Floor ◽  
Molar Region

The aim of this study was to measure the convexity of the lateral wall of the maxillary (Mx) sinus and identify the locational distribution of antral septa in relation to the zygomaticomaxillary buttress (ZMB), in order to suggest another anatomical consideration and surgical modification of sinus floor elevation procedures. This study was designed as a cross-sectional study, and a total of 134 patients and 161 sinuses containing edentulous alveolar ridges were analyzed. The angle between the anterior and lateral walls of the Mx sinus (lateral sinus angle [LSA]), and the angle between the midpalatal line and the anterior sinus wall (anterior sinus angle [ASA]) were measured. Mean LSAs and ASAs were 105.9° ± 9.86° and 58.4° ± 6.43°, respectively. No significant difference between left and right sides was found (LSA, P = .420; right = 105.5° ± 9.27°; left = 105.5° ± 9.27° and ASA, P = .564; right = 57.9° ± 6.80°; left = 58.8° ± 6.02°). The prevalence of septa was 37.3%, and it was most frequently noted in the second molar region (32.8%), followed by the first molar (20.9%), retromolar (16.4%), and second premolar regions (14.9%). Septa were most frequently located posterior to the ZMB (49.2%), while ZMB was mostly located in the first molar region (66.4%). Narrow LSAs may complicate the surgical approach to the posterior maxilla, especially when sinus elevation should be used in the second molar region. Considering the occasional presence of antral septa, membrane elevation may be complicated when a septum is encountered during the procedure. These results suggest that 3-dimensional examination of the convexity of the Mx sinus should be performed preoperatively to choose proper surgical techniques and minimize surgical complications.

A combined lateral-crestal approach of sinus floor elevation: A report on three cases

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xin Zhang ◽  
Yuting Zhang ◽  
Jian Wang ◽  
Qianbing Wan ◽  
Lei Li
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Study ◽  
Conservative Treatment ◽  
Lateral Approach ◽  
Clinical Report ◽  
Sinus Lift ◽  
Sinus Floor Elevation ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Sinus Floor

This clinical report describes a combined lateral-crestal approach to elevate the sinus floor when placing implants on a wide maxillary posterior ridge. The buccally enlarged osteotomy broadens vision of practitioners and facilitates access of instruments in the sinus. Compared to the traditional lateral approach of sinus lift, the proposed technique may offer a more conservative treatment modality. And a clinical study with sufficient subjects and long term follow up is needed to validate the potential and limitations of the proposed technique.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document