Surgical and Oncological Outcome of Total Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy in Obese Women With Early-Stage Cervical Cancer

2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esther Louise Moss ◽  
Janos Balega ◽  
Kiong K. Chan ◽  
Kavita Singh
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Safe Procedure ◽  
Obese Women ◽  
Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Early Stage Cervical Cancer ◽  
Nonobese Group

ObjectiveTo evaluate the clinical experience of the total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (TLRH) for the surgical management of cervical cancer in obese (body mass index [BMI] >30 kg/m2) and nonobese (BMI <30 kg/m2) women.MethodsData were collected prospectively on intraoperative and postoperative parameters and complications for all women undergoing a TLRH for cervical cancer. Patients were classified as obese, BMI >30 kg/m2, or nonobese, BMI <30 kg/m2. Assessment of surgical radicality was made by comparing the excision specimens in the 2 groups with a cohort of open radical hysterectomy cases performed before the introduction of the TLRH.ResultsA total of 58 women underwent a TLRH; 15 (25.9%) were obese and 43 (74.1%) were in the nonobese group. There was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss or median duration of surgery between the obese and nonobese groups. The median hospital stay in both groups was 3 days (range, 2–13 days). Four cases were converted to laparotomy (7%); all were in the nonobese group. Postoperatively, 3 patients developed ischemic ureterovaginal fistulae (5%) between days 5 and 7 after surgery; all were in the nonobese group. There was no significant difference in the parametrial length, maximum vaginal cuff length, and number of lymph nodes excised between the 2 groups. To date, there has been one recurrence during the median follow-up period of 19 months (range, 3–42 months). She belonged to the nonobese group.ConclusionsThe TLRH is a surgically safe procedure for early-stage cervical cancer. Obesity did not adversely affect the performance of TLRH or the radicality of the excision. In obese women, TLRH should be the favored route of surgery for all women who require a radical hysterectomy owing to its favorable perioperative outcome and short hospital stay.

scholarly journals A laparoszkópos és nyitott radikális hysterectomia összehasonlítása a méhnyakrák műtéti ellátásában

2017 ◽  
Vol 158 (36) ◽  
pp. 1403-1409
Author(s):  
Rudolf Lampé ◽  
Róbert Póka
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Nerve Sparing ◽  
Malignant Tumours ◽  
Laparoscopy Group ◽  
Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Common Causes ◽  
Early Stage Cervical Cancer

Abstract: Introduction: Cervical cancer is one of the most common causes of death among women with malignant tumours. The two most common ways of surgical technique of early stage cervical cancer is the laparoscopy and the laparotomy. Aim: Our aim was to compare the intra- and postoperative results of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy. Method: Ten nerve sparing laparoscopic and 11 abdominal radical hysterectomies were performed from June 2016 until June 2017 because of early stage cervical cancer. Results were analysed retrospectively. Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups in the length of the operation, in blood loss and in intra- and postoperative complications. Significantly more lymph nodes were harvested by abdominal surgery and the length of hospitalisation was significantly shorter in the laparoscopy group. Conclusion: Results of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy are comparable and not worse than abdominal radical hysterectomy. Laparoscopic way may have a priority because of the general advantages of laparoscopic surgery in the surgical treatment of early stage cervical cancer. Orv Hetil. 2017; 158(36): 1403–1409.

scholarly journals Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: a multicenter analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. ijgc-2020-002086
Author(s):  
Juliana Rodriguez ◽  
Jose Alejandro Rauh-Hain ◽  
James Saenz ◽  
David Ortiz Isla ◽  
Gabriel Jaime Rendon Pereira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Oncological Outcomes ◽  
Early Stage Cervical Cancer ◽  
Laparotomy Group ◽  
Disease Free

IntroductionRecent evidence has shown adverse oncological outcomes when minimally invasive surgery is used in early-stage cervical cancer. The objective of this study was to compare disease-free survival in patients that had undergone radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy, either by laparoscopy or laparotomy.MethodsWe performed a multicenter, retrospective cohort study of patients with cervical cancer stage IA1 with lymph-vascular invasion, IA2, and IB1 (FIGO 2009 classification), between January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2017, at seven cancer centers from six countries. We included squamous, adenocarcinoma, and adenosquamous histologies. We used an inverse probability of treatment weighting based on propensity score to construct a weighted cohort of women, including predictor variables selected a priori with the possibility of confounding the relationship between the surgical approach and survival. We estimated the HR for all-cause mortality after radical hysterectomy with weighted Cox proportional hazard models.ResultsA total of 1379 patients were included in the final analysis, with 681 (49.4%) operated by laparoscopy and 698 (50.6%) by laparotomy. There were no differences regarding the surgical approach in the rates of positive vaginal margins, deep stromal invasion, and lymphovascular space invasion. Median follow-up was 52.1 months (range, 0.8–201.2) in the laparoscopic group and 52.6 months (range, 0.4–166.6) in the laparotomy group. Women who underwent laparoscopic radical hysterectomy had a lower rate of disease-free survival compared with the laparotomy group (4-year rate, 88.7% vs 93.0%; HR for recurrence or death from cervical cancer 1.64; 95% CI 1.09–2.46; P=0.02). In sensitivity analyzes, after adjustment for adjuvant treatment, radical hysterectomy by laparoscopy compared with laparotomy was associated with increased hazards of recurrence or death from cervical cancer (HR 1.7; 95% CI 1.13 to 2.57; P=0.01) and death for any cause (HR 2.14; 95% CI 1.05–4.37; P=0.03).ConclusionIn this retrospective multicenter study, laparoscopy was associated with worse disease-free survival, compared to laparotomy.

Self-Reported Long-Term Autonomic Function After Laparoscopic Total Mesometrial Resection for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Multicentric Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (7) ◽  
pp. 1501-1507 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Lucidi ◽  
Swetlana Windemut ◽  
Marco Petrillo ◽  
Margherita Dessole ◽  
Giulio Sozzi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Vaginal Hysterectomy ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Nerve Sparing ◽  
Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Early Stage Cervical Cancer ◽  
Laparoscopic Assisted

ObjectivesThis multicentric retrospective study investigates the early and long-term self-reported urinary, bowel, and sexual dysfunctions in early-stage cervical cancer patients who submitted to laparoscopic total mesometrial resection (L-TMMR), total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy, vaginal-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy, and laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy.MethodsCervical cancer patients, FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) stage IA2–IB1/IIA1 who submitted to nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy were recruited. Pelvic functions were assessed within 30 days (early outcome) and 12 months after surgery (long-term outcome).ResultsTwo hundred thirteen subjects receiving nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy were enrolled. Laparoscopic total mesometrial resection was performed in 46 patients (21.6%), total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in 65 patients (30.5%), vaginal-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in 54 patients (25.4%), and laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy in 48 women (22.5%). Operative time was significantly lower in the L-TMMR group (240 minutes; range, 120–670 minutes; P = 0.001). The overall perioperative complication rate was 11.3%, with no statistically significant differences among the 4 groups. Stress incontinence and sensation of bladder incomplete emptying were detected, respectively, in 54 patients (25.6%) and 65 patients (30.7%) with a significantly lower prevalence among those in the L-TMMR group, which resulted, respectively, in 11.1% (P = 0.022) and 13.3% (P = 0.036). The prevalence rates of constipation, sensation of incomplete bowel emptying, and effort during evacuation were significantly higher among those in the L-TMMR group, resulting in, respectively, 37% (P = 0.001), 42.3% (P = 0.012), and 50% (P = 0.039). One hundred forty-nine patients (70%) were sexually active. Fifty-eight women (38.9%) reported low enjoyment, 83 women (55.7%) medium enjoyment, and 8 women (5.4%) reported high enjoyment, without statistically significant differences among the 4 groups.ConclusionsLaparoscopic total mesometrial resection is associated with improved long-term urinary autonomic functions and worse gastrointestinal autonomic outcome. Further larger prospective trials are needed to evaluate both the oncological and functional outcomes in order to establish the most appropriate surgical approach for early-stage cervical cancer patients.

Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for bulky early-stage cervical cancer

2013 ◽  
Vol 130 (1) ◽  
pp. e14
Author(s):  
J. Nam ◽  
J. Park ◽  
D. Kim ◽  
J. Kim ◽  
Y. Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Early Stage Cervical Cancer

Surgical and Pathological Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy With Pelvic Lymphadenectomy and/or Para-aortic Lymph Node Sampling for Bulky Early-Stage Cervical Cancer

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 1222-1227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tao Zhu ◽  
Xi Chen ◽  
Jianqing Zhu ◽  
Yaqing Chen ◽  
Aijun Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Pelvic Lymphadenectomy ◽  
Tumor Diameter ◽  
Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Lymph Node Sampling ◽  
Aortic Lymph Node ◽  
Early Stage Cervical Cancer

Background and ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to compare the feasibility, morbidity, and recurrence rate of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) with those of abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH) for bulky early-stage cervical cancer.MethodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study of 112 patients with stage IB1 or IIA2 cervical cancer in which the tumor diameter was 3 cm or greater. All patients underwent LRH (n = 30) or ARH (n = 82) with pelvic lymphadenectomy and/or para-aortic lymph node sampling between May 2011 and November 2014. Perioperative outcomes were compared between the 2 surgical groups.ResultsThe laparoscopic approach consisted of 4 trocar insertions. Age, tumor diameter, and pelvic lymph nodes significantly differed between the 2 cohorts. Body mass index, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage, histologic type and grade, deep stromal invasion, lymphovascular space invasion, positive margins, and adjuvant therapy were not significantly different between the 2 cohorts. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy exhibited favorable results compared with ARH in terms of operating time, blood loss, intestinal exhaust time, and length of hospital stay. In addition, recurrence was observed in 5 LRH patients (16.7%) and 9 ARH patients (11.7%).ConclusionsThe surgical outcomes of LRH with pelvic lymphadenectomy and/or para-aortic lymph node sampling exhibited a similar therapeutic efficacy to those of the ARH approach.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document