A refugee child with multiple patterned ecchymoses

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandros Makis ◽  
Vasiliki Masina ◽  
Evangelia-Anna Spiteri ◽  
Ioanna Aggeli ◽  
Georgios Vartholomatos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Christian Whalen

AbstractArticle 22 guarantees the substantive application of all Convention rights to the particular situation of asylum seeking and refugee children, and also guarantees them protection and assistance in advancing their immigration and residency status claims and in overcoming the hurdles posed by international migration channels, including guarantees of due process. The rights of refugee and asylum-seeking children can be analyzed in relation to four essential attributes. First of all, Article 22 insists upon appropriate protection and humanitarian assistance. Refugee children are not granted a special status under the Convention, but they are not given any lesser status. They are to be treated as children first and foremost and not as migrants per se, in the sense that national immigration policy cannot trump child rights. The basic rights to education, health, and child welfare of these children needs to be protected to the same extent, and as much as possible, as children who are nationals of the host country. The second attribute preserves the rights of refugee children not only under the Convention but under all other international human right treaties and humanitarian instruments binding on the relevant States Party. These may include, for many governments, the 1951 Refugee Convention, the Convention on the Reduction of Statelessness, the Geneva Conventions and the Hague Convention for the Protection of Minors, 1961, among others. A third attribute of Article 22 insists upon the duty to protect and assist refugee children. This entails a clear duty to provide children with appropriate due process rights throughout their asylum and refugee claims procedures, including the child’s right to be heard and participate in all the processes determining the child’s residence or immigration status, border admission, deportation, repatriation, detention, alternative measures, or placement, including best interest determination processes. The fourth and final attribute of Article 22 asserts that two basic principles should guide each activity with the refugee child: the best interests of the child and the principle of family unity.


2017 ◽  
pp. bcr-2017-220748
Author(s):  
Dimitri Poddighe ◽  
Tiziana Boggini ◽  
Salvatore Savasta ◽  
Gian Luigi Marseglia

2010 ◽  
Vol 192 (4) ◽  
pp. 237-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juliette M Lucey ◽  
James McCarthy ◽  
David P Burgner

2004 ◽  
Vol 99 (2) ◽  
pp. 147-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Luc Bailly ◽  
Marie-Céleste Cardoso ◽  
André Labbé ◽  
Hélène Peigue-Lafeuille

2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 76-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saeb F. Al Ganideh ◽  
Linda K Good

Purpose – The Syrian civil war that forced hundreds of thousands of Syrian women and children into Jordan as refugees dramatically increased the number of child labourers in that country. The current investigation aims to establish a body of knowledge on the issues surrounding child labour in Jordan by providing an exploratory diagnosis of the phenomenon. The purpose of this paper is to explore verbal and physical abusive practices towards working children and investigate whether there are differences between the treatment of domestic and Syrian refugee child labourers. Design/methodology/approach – The research design is quantitative; however, we use a qualitative technique to support and expand the research findings. Data were collected from 124 Jordanian and Syrian working children over a seven-month period in 2013. Findings – The results reveal that it is poverty that forces Jordanian children into work while Syrian children are driven by the need for asylum. Of the abusive practices directed towards working children, verbal abuse is the most common. Older children, children from unstable families and those who work long hours are more vulnerable to this form of abuse, while children from unstable family structures and who work long hours are more likely to experience physically abuse. The results reveal that Syrian children are paid much less, are less verbally abused, had better schooling and perceive working conditions more positively than do their Jordanian counterparts. Research limitations/implications – Limitations of this research arise from the size the sample. Social implications – The current study aims to raise awareness about the importance of preventing abusive practices towards local and refugee children working in Jordan. Originality/value – To the best of the authors’ knowledge, very little is known about refugee child labour and how it might differ from domestic child labour.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document