Does lymph node localization affect prostate-specific membrane antigen uptake?

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (8) ◽  
pp. 835-841
Author(s):  
Burak Sönmezer ◽  
Emine Acar ◽  
Erdem Erkoyun ◽  
Gamze Capa Kaya
2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. e261-e262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingo Einspieler ◽  
Robert Tauber ◽  
Tobias Maurer ◽  
Markus Schwaiger ◽  
Matthias Eiber

2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tom Laurens ◽  
Fred Witjes ◽  
Marcel Janssen ◽  
Uta Flucke ◽  
Martin Gottardt

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 465-467
Author(s):  
Yingwei Wang ◽  
Cheng Zeng ◽  
Huipan Liu ◽  
Yue Chen ◽  
Wei Zhang

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. e108-e109
Author(s):  
Ayça Arçay ◽  
Funda Aydin ◽  
Ömer Kutlu ◽  
Güzide Ayşe Ocak ◽  
Firat Güngör

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 238-240
Author(s):  
Veronica Chi Ken Wong ◽  
Lily Shen ◽  
Elias Nasser ◽  
David Nicholas Adams ◽  
Robert Mansberg

Author(s):  
Katharina Kessel ◽  
Robert Seifert ◽  
Matthias Weckesser ◽  
Martin Boegemann ◽  
Sebastian Huss ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Fibroblast activation protein (FAP) has been recently presented as new imaging target for malignant diseases and offers high contrast to surrounding normal tissue. FAP tracer uptake has been reported in various tumor entities. The aim of this study was to compare FAP and Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression in primary prostate cancer employing histological analyses and PET imaging in two small patient collectives. Methods Two independent small patient collectives were included in this study. For cohort A, data of 5 prostate cancer patients and 3 patients with benign prostate hyperplasia were included. Patients with prostate cancer were initially referred for PSMA PET staging. Radical prostatectomy was performed in all patients and prostate specimen of patients and biopsies of healthy controls were available for further evaluation. Histological workup included HE and immunohistochemistry using PSMA Ab, FAP Ab. Cohort B consists of 6 Patients with diagnosed mCRPC and available PSMA as well as FAP PET. Results Patients with proven prostate cancer infiltration exhibited strong positivity for PSMA in both primary tumors and lymph node metastases while stainings for FAP were found positive in some cases, but not all (2/5). Controls with BPH presented moderate PSMA staining and in one case also with a positive FAP staining (1/3). PET imaging with FAP seemed to result in more precise results in case of low PSMA expression than PSMA-PET. Conclusions While PSMA staining intensity is a valid indicator of prostate cancer in both primary tumor and lymph node metastases, the expression of FAP seems to be heterogeneous but not necessarily linked to cancer-associated fibroblasts. It is also present in inflammation-associated myofibroblasts. Therefore, its ultimate role in prostate cancer diagnosis remains a subject of discussion.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document