Management of patients with unilateral microtia and aural atresia

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Allison K. Ikeda ◽  
Amit D. Bhrany ◽  
Kathleen C.Y. Sie ◽  
Randall A. Bly
Keyword(s):  
2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 189-191
Author(s):  
Dr. Chirag Prafulchandra Vaghela ◽  
◽  
Dr. Priyank Vinodbhai Rathod

2006 ◽  
Vol 27 (7) ◽  
pp. 934-936 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Caughey ◽  
Robert A. Jahrsdoerfer ◽  
Bradley W. Kesser

2009 ◽  
Vol 119 (S3) ◽  
pp. S293-S293
Author(s):  
Alexander J. Osborn ◽  
John S. Oghalai ◽  
Jeffrey T. Vrabec

2015 ◽  
Vol 77 (S3) ◽  
pp. 1237-1241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kun Chen ◽  
Chenyan Jiang ◽  
Qingwei Wu ◽  
Yiyuan Sun ◽  
Runjie Shi

2011 ◽  
Vol 145 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. P90-P90
Author(s):  
Marco Carner ◽  
Liliana Colletti ◽  
Marco Barillari ◽  
Roberto Cerini ◽  
Roberto Pozzi Mucelli ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 118A (4) ◽  
pp. 391-393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy Mizue Kokitsu-Nakata ◽  
Maria Leine Guion-Almeida

Author(s):  
Tadashi Nishimura ◽  
Hiroshi Hosoi ◽  
Tomoko Sugiuchi ◽  
Nozomu Matsumoto ◽  
Takanori Nishiyama ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Cartilage conduction hearing aids (CCHAs) were newly devised and spread fast in Japan since their launch in 2017. However, little knowledge is available for this new device. Purpose The aim of this study was to establish the knowledge of CCHAs and suggest their indication. Research Design Correlational study. Study Sample A total 256 patients were registered. Data Collection and Analysis The fitting of CCHAs was surveyed in nine institutions. The outcomes were assessed by audiometric tests. The patients were classified into seven groups, depending on the ear conditions. The clinical characteristics, assessment results, and purchase rates were compared among the groups. The assessment results of CCHAs were also compared with those of previously used hearing aids. Results Most patients who used CCHAs were classified into the bilateral closed (aural atresia or severe stenosis) ear (n = 65) or unilateral closed ear (n = 124) groups. The patients in these groups achieved good benefits that resulted in a high purchase rate. The bilateral continuous otorrhea group also supported a high purchase rate, although the benefits of CCHAs were not always excellent. In contrast, the purchase rate was poor in the patients who could use air conduction hearing aids (ACHAs) without absolute problems. As for using a CCHA as a contralateral routing of signals hearing aid, the benefits depended on the patients. Conclusions CCHAs are considered as a great option not only to the patients with closed ears but also to those who had difficulties in ACHAs usage.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document