Nursesʼ Use of Positive Deviance When Encountering Electronic Health Records-Related Unintended Consequences

2018 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. E1-E11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alycia A. Bristol ◽  
Christine W. Nibbelink ◽  
Sheila M. Gephart ◽  
Jane M. Carrington
2018 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Onur Asan ◽  
Ann B. Nattinger ◽  
Ayse P. Gurses ◽  
Jeanne T. Tyszka ◽  
Tina W.F. Yen

Background Electronic health records (EHRs) play a significant role in complex health care processes, especially in information transfer with patients and care coordination among providers. EHRs may also generate unintended consequences, introducing new patient safety risks. To date, little investigation has been performed in oncology settings, despite the need for quality provider-patient communication and information transfer during oncology visits. In this qualitative study, we focused on oncology providers’ perceptions of EHRs for supporting communication with patients and coordination of care with other providers. Methods We conducted semistructured interviews with oncologists from an urban academic medical center to learn their perceptions of the use of EHRs before, during, and after clinic visits with patients. Our interview guide was developed on the basis of the work system model. We coded transcripts using inductive content analysis. Results Data analysis yielded four main themes regarding oncologists’ practices in using the EHR and perceptions about EHRs: (1) EHR use for care coordination (eg, timeliness of receiving information, SmartSet documentation); (2) EHR use in the clinic visit (eg, educating patients, using as a reinforcement tool); (3) safety hazards in care coordination associated with EHRs (eg, incomplete documentation, error propagating, no filtering mechanism to capture errors); and (4) suggestions for improvements (eg, improved SmartSet functionalities, simplification of user interface). Conclusion Current EHRs do not adequately support teamwork of oncology providers, which could lead to potential hazards in the care of patients with cancer. Redesigning EHR features that are tailored to support oncology care and addressing the concerns regarding information overload, improved organization of flagging abnormal results, and documentation-related workload are needed to minimize potential safety hazards.


Author(s):  
Susan McBride ◽  
Mari Tietze ◽  
Catherine Robichaux ◽  
Liz Stokes ◽  
Eileen Weber

With the passage of the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act in 2009, the United States, as of 2017, has achieved 95% saturation with electronic health records as a means to document healthcare delivery in acute care hospitals and guide clinical decision making. Evidence is mounting that EHRs are resulting in unintended consequences with patient safety implications. Clinical teams confront usability challenges that can present ethical issues requiring ethical decision-making models to support clinicians in appropriate action on behalf of safe, effective clinical care. The purpose of this article is to identify and address ethical issues raised by nurses in use of electronic health records. We provide a case scenario with application of the Four Component Model and describe a study of nurse experiences with the EHR. The nursing Code of Ethics, Nursing Scope and Standards, and Legal Implications are reviewed, and we conclude with recommendations and a call to action.


2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (10) ◽  
pp. 436-447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheila M. Gephart ◽  
Alycia A. Bristol ◽  
Judy L. Dye ◽  
Brooke A. Finley ◽  
Jane M. Carrington

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 163-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
William B. Ventres ◽  
Richard M. Frankel

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document