Geriatric Fracture Programs

2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 165-168
Author(s):  
Jennifer Sedlock ◽  
Jaymie Green ◽  
Lauren Diegel-Vacek
Keyword(s):  
BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. e039960
Author(s):  
Michael Blauth ◽  
Alexander Joeris ◽  
Elke Rometsch ◽  
Kathrin Espinoza-Rebmann ◽  
Pannida Wattanapanom ◽  
...  

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to determine the effect of treatment in geriatric fracture centres (GFC) on the incidence of major adverse events (MAEs) in patients with hip fractures compared with usual care centres (UCC). Secondary objectives included hospital-workflow and mobility-related outcomes.DesignCohort study recruiting patients between June 2015 and January 2017. Follow-up was 1 year.SettingInternational (six countries, three continents) multicentre study.Participants281 patients aged ≥70 with operatively treated proximal femur fractures.InterventionsTreatment in UCCs (n=139) or GFCs (n=142), that is, interdisciplinary treatment including regular geriatric consultation and daily physiotherapy.Outcome measuresPrimary outcome was occurrence of prespecified MAEs, including delirium. Secondary outcomes included any other adverse events, time to surgery, time in acute ward, 1-year mortality, mobility, and quality of life.ResultsPatients treated in GFCs (n=142) had a mean age of 81.9 (SD, 6.6) years versus 83.9 (SD 6.9) years in patients (n=139) treated in UCCs (p=0.013) and a higher mean Charlson Comorbidity Index of 2.0 (SD, 2.1) versus 1.2 (SD, 1.5) in UCCs (p=0.001). More patients in GFCs (28.2%) experienced an MAE during the first year after surgery compared with UCCs (7.9%) with an OR of 4.56 (95% CI 2.23 to 9.34, p<0.001). Analysing individual MAEs, this was significant for pneumonia (GFC: 9.2%; UCC: 2.9%; OR, 3.40 (95% CI 1.08 to 10.70), p=0.027) and delirium (GFC: 11.3%; UCC: 2.2%, OR, 5.76 (95% CI 1.64 to 20.23), p=0.002).ConclusionsContrary to our study hypothesis, the rate of MAEs was higher in GFCs than in UCCs. Delirium was revealed as a main contributor. Most likely, this was based on improved detection rather than a truly elevated incidence, which we interpret as positive effect of geriatric comanagement.Trial registration numberClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02297581.


2012 ◽  
Vol 134 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. S. L. Liem ◽  
C. Kammerlander ◽  
N. Suhm ◽  
S. L. Kates ◽  
M. Blauth

2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 91-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon C. Mears ◽  
Michael Suk ◽  
Fraser Cobbe ◽  
Stephen L. Kates
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S740-S740
Author(s):  
Sonja L Rosen ◽  
Kathy Breda ◽  
Carol Lin ◽  
Jeanne Black ◽  
Jae Lee ◽  
...  

Abstract Geriatric-orthopaedic co-management models have been demonstrated to improve patient outcomes, but are typically implemented in closed, non-pluralistic medial systems. The Cedars-Sinai Geriatric Fracture Program (GFP) was developed through collaboration amongst a multi-disciplinary group. Cedars-Sinai is an academic medical center with a pluralistic medical staff that includes faculty, several hospitalist groups, and private practitioners. The GFP was introduced in July 2018 as a quality improvement pilot to provide standardized treatment for geriatric fracture patients. We hypothesized GFP enrollment would reduce time to surgery (TTS) and length of stay (LOS). Geriatric fracture patients were prospectively enrolled from July -December 2018. The Wilcoxon Rank- Sum test was used to compare TTS and LOS between the two patient groups. A p &lt; 0.05 was considered significant. 190 operative fractures in patients over 65 years-old were prospectively followed.56 (30%) were enrolled in the GFP, 54 (28%) were admitted to other hospitalist groups (OH), and 80 (42%) were managed by their primary care physician (PCP). There were no demographic differences between groups. Patients enrolled in the GFP had a significantly shorter LOS compared to the OH and PCP groups (4 days v 5 days v 5 days, p = 0.039) as well as a significantly shorter TTS (19.7hrs v 22.4 hrs vs 23.3 hrs, p = 0.037). Our data shows that a multi-disciplinary geriatric fracture program can be successfully implemented in a complex pluralistic environment resulting in improved patient metrics. Adherence to evidence-based protocols and close multidisciplinary teamwork are critical to program success.


2019 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
pp. S665-S666
Author(s):  
C.M. Olarte ◽  
J.E. Camacho ◽  
A. Mejía Grueso ◽  
M. Zuluaga ◽  
A. Guzman ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 312-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natasha T. O’Malley ◽  
Stephen L. Kates

2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 43-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. B. M. Weerink ◽  
E. C. Folbert ◽  
M. Kraai ◽  
R. S. Smit ◽  
J. H. Hegeman ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document