Atypical Clinical Presentation of Periprosthetic Femur Fracture After Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

2010 ◽  
Vol 89 (9) ◽  
pp. 772-775 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaspal R. Singh ◽  
Jared S. Greenberg ◽  
Pasqual Colavita
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Clinical Presentation ◽  
Femur Fracture ◽  
Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Periprosthetic Femur Fracture ◽  
Atypical Clinical Presentation

Outcomes of post-operative periprosthetic femur fracture around total hip arthroplasty: a review

2014 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eddie S Wu ◽  
Jeffrey J Cherian ◽  
Bhaveen H Kapadia ◽  
Samik Banerjee ◽  
Julio J Jauregui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Femur Fracture ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Periprosthetic Femur Fracture

Clinical, functional and radiographic outcomes after revision total hip arthroplasty with tapered fluted modular or non-modular stems: a systematic review

2021 ◽  
pp. 112070002110043
Author(s):  
Antonios A Koutalos ◽  
Sokratis Varitimidis ◽  
Konstantinos N Malizos ◽  
Theofilos Karachalios
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Revision Rate ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Fracture Rate ◽  
Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Radiographic Outcomes

Purpose: The aim of the study was to systematically evaluate clinical outcomes of tapered fluted stems, either monoblock or modular, in revision total hip arthroplasty. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science and Cochrane databases were systematically searched by 2 researchers. Clinical studies reporting primarily on survival and re-revision rates, and secondarily on subsidence, dislocation, intraoperative fractures, periprosthetic fractures and infection were included. 2 investigators assessed the quality of the studies. Results: 46 studies were included in this review, reporting on 4601 stem revisions. The pooled re-revision rate was 5.1% and long-term survival ranged from 75% to 98.5%. No differences were observed between monoblock and modular stems regarding re-revision rate, dislocation rate, periprosthetic fracture rate or infection rates. Monoblock stems exhibited more subsidence and modular stems displayed more intraoperative fractures. Conclusions: Satisfactory results can be obtained with the use of tapered fluted end-bearing stems. Monoblock stems offer the same clinical results as modular stems.

Injury to the Colon During Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

2008 ◽  
Vol 90 (4) ◽  
pp. 881-884 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindsey S. Hagstrom ◽  
Dennis J. Callahan ◽  
James W. Green
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Total Hip
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document