scholarly journals Agreement Between 18F-FDG PET/CT and Whole-Body Magnetic Resonance Compared With Skeletal Survey for Initial Staging and Response at End-of-Treatment Evaluation of Patients With Multiple Myeloma

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Nieves Gómez León ◽  
Beatriz Aguado Moreno ◽  
María Herreros Pérez ◽  
Luisa F. León Ramírez ◽  
Adrián Alegre ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Olwen Westerland ◽  
◽  
Ashik Amlani ◽  
Christian Kelly-Morland ◽  
Michal Fraczek ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Comparative data on the impact of imaging on management is lacking for multiple myeloma. This study compared the diagnostic performance and impact on management of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) and whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WBMRI) in treatment-naive myeloma. Methods Forty-six patients undergoing 18F-FDG PET/CT and WBMRI were reviewed by a nuclear medicine physician and radiologist, respectively, for the presence of myeloma bone disease. Blinded clinical and imaging data were reviewed by two haematologists in consensus and management recorded following clinical data ± 18F-FDG PET/CT or WBMRI. Bone disease was defined using International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria and a clinical reference standard. Per-patient sensitivity for lesion detection was established. McNemar test compared management based on clinical assessment ± 18F-FDG PET/CT or WBMRI. Results Sensitivity for bone lesions was 69.6% (32/46) for 18F-FDG PET/CT (54.3% (25/46) for PET component alone) and 91.3% (42/46) for WBMRI. 27/46 (58.7%) of cases were concordant. In 19/46 patients (41.3%) WBMRI detected more focal bone lesions than 18F-FDG PET/CT. Based on clinical data alone, 32/46 (69.6%) patients would have been treated. Addition of 18F-FDG PET/CT to clinical data increased this to 40/46 (87.0%) patients (p = 0.02); and WBMRI to clinical data to 43/46 (93.5%) patients (p = 0.002). The difference in treatment decisions was not statistically significant between 18F-FDG PET/CT and WBMRI (p = 0.08). Conclusion Compared to 18F-FDG PET/CT, WBMRI had a higher per patient sensitivity for bone disease. However, treatment decisions were not statistically different and either modality would be appropriate in initial staging, depending on local availability and expertise.


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 382-393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Abd Alkhalik Basha ◽  
Maged Abdel Gelil Hamed ◽  
Rania Refaat ◽  
Mohamad Zakarya AlAzzazy ◽  
Manar A. Bessar ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 213 (3) ◽  
pp. 514-523 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianpu Chen ◽  
Chongjiao Li ◽  
Yueli Tian ◽  
Qing Xiao ◽  
Ming Deng ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 133 ◽  
pp. 109403
Author(s):  
Alberto Paternain ◽  
María José García-Velloso ◽  
Juan José Rosales ◽  
Ana Ezponda ◽  
Ignacio Soriano ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 148 (7) ◽  
pp. e37
Author(s):  
Alvaro de Bonilla Damiá ◽  
Rosa Fernández López ◽  
Antonio Paz Coll ◽  
Isabel Borrego Dorado

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
François Allioux ◽  
Damaj Gandhi ◽  
Jean-Pierre Vilque ◽  
Cathy Nganoa ◽  
Anne-Claire Gac ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 540-543 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kuruva Manohar ◽  
Anish Bhattacharya ◽  
Bhagwant R. Mittal
Keyword(s):  
Fdg Pet ◽  
Pet Ct ◽  
18F Fdg ◽  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document