Quantitative Evaluation of Palatal Lengthening After Cleft Palate Repair When a Buccal Flap Is Routinely Combined With Furlow's Z-Plasty

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Mamdouh Ahmed Aboulhassan ◽  
Tarek Mahmoud Aly ◽  
Mahmoud Mohamed Akram khodir ◽  
Hassan Mahmoud Moussa ◽  
Mohammed Ahmed Hussein
FACE ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 273250162110068
Author(s):  
Abigail E. Haenssler ◽  
Jamie L. Perry ◽  
Samuel A. Mann ◽  
Robert J. Mann

Purpose: Primary palatoplasties using the Anatomic Cleft Restoration Philosophy uses the buccinator myomucosal flap (buccal flap) as the major tissue replacement flap to correct the tissue deficiency within the cleft palate malformation. The surgical approach aims to close the palate without tension, lengthen the palate, reconstruct the levator muscular sling, not inhibit craniofacial growth and achieve proper resonance for speech. The purpose of this study is to present preliminary data on velopharyngeal variables to demonstrate the muscle and tissue morphology in adults with cleft palate who have not received a secondary surgery for speech or orthognathic surgery. Methods: Magnetic resonance imaging was used to analyze velopharyngeal variables for 2 individuals with the buccal flap approach and 2 individuals who received a traditional cleft palate repair. Linear measurements were obtained and 2 velopharyngeal ratios were calculated. Results: All variables were compared to previously published normative data of velopharyngeal variables for individuals with non-cleft anatomy who are of the same race, sex, and of similar age. The individuals with the buccal flap approach presented with a similar velar length and levator length in comparison to individuals with non-cleft anatomy. The individuals with the buccal flap approach presented with a longer effective velar length and velar length in comparison to individuals with a traditional cleft palate repair. Visually, the individual with the buccal flap presents with a thicker tissue mass between the hard and soft palate junction. Conclusions: In this case study, individuals who received a primary palatoplasty with the buccal flap approach presented with a longer velum and effective velar length in comparison to individuals with a traditional cleft palate repair and those with non-cleft anatomy. This study highlights the utility of using magnetic resonance imaging to quantify the changes that occur to the velopharyngeal anatomy following the buccal flap surgical approach.


2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 909-914
Author(s):  
Rachel Skladman ◽  
Lynn Marty Grames ◽  
Gary Skolnick ◽  
Dennis C. Nguyen ◽  
Sybill D. Naidoo ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 105566562110174
Author(s):  
Thomas R. Cawthorn ◽  
Anna R. Todd ◽  
Nina Hardcastle ◽  
Adam O. Spencer ◽  
A. Robertson Harrop ◽  
...  

Objective: To evaluate the development process and clinical impact of implementing a standardized perioperative clinical care pathway for cleft palate repair. Design: Medical records of patients undergoing primary cleft palate repair prior to pathway implementation were retrospectively reviewed as a historical control group (N = 40). The historical cohort was compared to a prospectively collected group of patients who were treated according to the pathway (N = 40). Patients: Healthy, nonsyndromic infants undergoing primary cleft palate repair at a tertiary care pediatric hospital. Interventions: A novel, standardized pathway was created through an iterative process, combining literature review with expert opinion and discussions with institutional stakeholders. The pathway integrated multimodal analgesia throughout the perioperative course and included intraoperative bilateral maxillary nerve blocks. Perioperative protocols for preoperative fasting, case timing, antiemetics, intravenous fluid management, and postoperative diet advancement were standardized. Main Outcome Measures: Primary outcomes include: (1) length of hospital stay, (2) cumulative opioid consumption, (3) oral intake postoperatively. Results: Patients treated according to the pathway had shorter mean length of stay (31 vs 57 hours, P < .001), decreased cumulative morphine consumption (77 vs 727 μg/kg, P < .001), shorter time to initiate oral intake (9.3 vs 22 hours, P = .01), and greater volume of oral intake in first 24 hours postoperatively (379 vs 171 mL, P < .001). There were no differences in total anesthesia time, total surgical time, or complication rates between the control and treatment groups. Conclusions: Implementation of a standardized perioperative clinical care pathway for primary cleft palate repair is safe, feasible, and associated with reduced length of stay, reduced opioid consumption, and improved oral intake postoperatively.


2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 1164-1166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin Wu ◽  
Alexander Wilson ◽  
Roberto Travieso ◽  
Derek M. Steinbacher

2021 ◽  
Vol 58 (5) ◽  
pp. 603-611
Author(s):  
Giap H. Vu ◽  
Christopher L. Kalmar ◽  
Carrie E. Zimmerman ◽  
Laura S. Humphries ◽  
Jordan W. Swanson ◽  
...  

Objective: This study assesses the association between risk of secondary surgery for oronasal fistula following primary cleft palate repair and 2 hospital characteristics—cost-to-charge ratio (RCC) and case volume of cleft palate repair. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: This study utilized the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database, which consists of clinical and resource-utilization data from >49 hospitals in the United States. Patients and Participants: Patients undergoing primary cleft palate repair from 2004 to 2009 were abstracted from the PHIS database and followed up for oronasal fistula repair between 2004 and 2015. Main Outcome Measure(s): The primary outcome measure was whether patients underwent oronasal fistula repair after primary cleft palate repair. Results: Among 5745 patients from 45 institutions whom met inclusion criteria, 166 (3%) underwent oronasal fistula repair within 6 to 11 years of primary cleft palate repair. Primary palatoplasty at high-RCC facilities was associated with a higher rate of subsequent oronasal fistula repair (odds ratio [OR] = 1.84 [1.32-2.56], adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.81 [1.28-2.59]; P ≤ .001). Likelihood of surgery for oronasal fistula was independent of hospital case volume (OR = 0.83 [0.61-1.13], P = .233; AOR = 0.86 [0.62-1.20], P = .386). Patients with complete unilateral or bilateral cleft palate were more likely to receive oronasal fistula closure compared to those with unilateral-incomplete cleft palate (AOR = 2.09 [1.27-3.56], P = .005; AOR = 3.14 [1.80-5.58], P < .001). Conclusions: Subsequent need for oronasal fistula repair, while independent of hospital case volume for cleft palate repair, increased with increasing hospital RCC. Our study also corroborates complete cleft palate and cleft lip as risk factors for oronasal fistula.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document