scholarly journals Laparoscopic Liver Resection Ameliorates the Postoperative Liver Function Impairment for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-73
Author(s):  
Hui Hou ◽  
Dachen Zhou ◽  
Xiao Cui ◽  
Lei Wang ◽  
Chunli Wu ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 205846012110349
Author(s):  
Mostafa Hamada ◽  
Eisuke Ueshima ◽  
Takeaki Ishihara ◽  
Yutaka Koide ◽  
Takuya Okada ◽  
...  

Background Technological developments have led to an increased usage of external-body radiotherapy (RT) for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) may be required later in patients treated with RT because of the high recurrence rate and multinodular presentation of HCC. However, despite the risk of liver function impairment, the cumulative liver damage correlated with TACE following a hepatic RT has not been adequately assessed. Purpose To evaluate the feasibility of TACE following RT for HCC. Materials and methods Sixty-seven patients with HCC who underwent TACE after RT were retrospectively evaluated between 2012 and 2018. We assessed increases in Child–Turcotte–Pugh (CTP) by ≥2 points at 1 month, the incidence of major complications, survival duration, and short-term mortality within 6 months after TACE. Furthermore, we evaluated the predictive factors for liver function impairment and short-term mortality. Results Eight patients experienced a CTP increase ≥2 points at 1 month. There were no cases of liver abscesses or bilomas. Nine patients died within 6 months following TACE. The mean liver dose (MLD) was a significant predictor of liver function impairment at 1 month ( p = 0.042). Low liver functional reserve, distant metastasis ( p = 0.037), MLD ( p = 0.046), TACE type ( p = 0.025), and TACE within 3 months following RT ( p = 0.007) were significant predictors of short-term mortality. Conclusions Despite the feasibility of TACE following RT, clinicians should pay attention to impaired pretreatment liver function, following high dose RT, and the short duration between RT and TACE.


HPB ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. S159
Author(s):  
Y. Uemoto ◽  
K. Taura ◽  
T. Nishio ◽  
Y. Kimura ◽  
N. Nam ◽  
...  

HPB Surgery ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Siniscalchi ◽  
Giorgio Ercolani ◽  
Giulia Tarozzi ◽  
Lorenzo Gamberini ◽  
Lucia Cipolat ◽  
...  

Introduction. Laparoscopic liver resection is considered risky in cirrhotic patients, even if minor surgical trauma of laparoscopy could be useful to prevent deterioration of a compromised liver function. This study aimed to identify the differences in terms of perioperative complications and early outcome in cirrhotic patients undergoing minor hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with open or laparoscopic technique. Methods. In this retrospective study, 156 cirrhotic patients undergoing liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma were divided into two groups according to type of surgical approach: laparoscopy (LS group: 23 patients) or laparotomy (LT group: 133 patients). Perioperative data, mortality, and length of hospital stay were recorded. Results. Groups were matched for type of resection, median number of nodules, and median diameter of largest lesions. Groups were also homogeneous for preoperative liver and renal function tests. Intraoperative haemoglobin decrease and transfusions of red blood cells and fresh frozen plasma were significantly lower in LS group. MELD score lasted stable after laparoscopic resection, while it increased in laparotomic group. Postoperative liver and renal failure and mortality were all lower in LS group. Conclusions. Lower morbidity and mortality, maintenance of liver function, and shorter hospital stay suggest the safety and benefit of laparoscopic approach.


2017 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. S442-S443
Author(s):  
H. Guro ◽  
J.Y. Cho ◽  
J.S. Jang ◽  
Y. Choi ◽  
H. Kim ◽  
...  

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed Mahfouz Mohammed ◽  
Hany Saeed Abdel Basset ◽  
Mohammed Abd Almegeed Elsayed ◽  
Ahmed Abdel Basset Hegazi

Abstract Background Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has been progressively developed along the past two decades. Liver surgery was one of the last frontiers reached by minimally invasive surgery. Surgical technique and equipment evolved to overcome technical limitations, making laparoscopic liver resections (LLR) safe and feasible. Surgeons developed skills in a stepwise approach, beginning with low complexity operations for benign diseases and reaching high-complexity surgeries for malignant cases and living donor organ harvesting. Objective s: The aim of the study is to compare short term results of laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy regarding to intra operative details and post-operative management and complications for achieving a safe hepatic resection for treatment of HCC in cirrhotic patients. Patients and Methods In this prospective study, a comparison between laparoscopic resection and open resection was done to compare short-term results between laparoscopic and open liver resection. This study was conducted on 30 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. 15 patients (50%) were treated by laparoscopic liver resection (Group A) while the other 15 patients (50%) were treated by open liver resection (Group B). Results Regarding the demographic data, the presence of past history of medical condition and the preoperative laboratory results, no statistical significance was found. The mean operative time has statistically significant difference between the 2 groups, with decreased operative time in the laparoscopic group (P < 0.001). The mean blood loss has no statistically significant difference relations between the 2 groups, (P = 0.866) with conversion rate of (13.3%) happened in two cases. Conclusion Laparoscopic liver resection is a safe and feasible treatment option for HCC in cirrhotic patient needing minor resection at laparoscopic segments (II, III, IVa,V,VI). Laparoscopic liver resection for HCC has superior short- term and comparable oncological outcomes to open liver resection. LLR should be performed for carefully selected patients and by an expert surgical team.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document