Early versus Delayed Complex Abdominal Wall Reconstruction with Biologic Mesh Following Damage Control Surgery

2020 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Shekhar Gogna ◽  
Rifat Latifi ◽  
James Choi ◽  
Jorge Con ◽  
Kartik Prabhakaran ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lijin Zou ◽  
Youlai Zhang ◽  
Ying He ◽  
Hui Yu ◽  
Jun Chen ◽  
...  

AbstractReconstruction of abdominal wall defects is still a big challenge in surgery, especially where there is insufficient fascia muscular or excessive tension of the defects in emergency and life-threatening scenarios. Indeed, the concept of damage control surgery has been advanced in the management of both traumatic and nontraumatic surgical settings. The strategy requires abridged surgery and quick back to intensive care units (ICU) for aggressive resuscitation. In the damage control laparotomy, patients are left with open abdomen or provisional closure of the abdomen with a planned return to the operating room for definitive surgery. So far, various techniques have been utilized to achieve early temporary abdominal closure, but there is no clear consensus on the ideal method or material for abdominal wall reconstruction. We recently successfully created the selective germline genome-edited pig (SGGEP) and here we aimed to explore the feasibility of in vivo reconstruction of the abdominal wall in a rabbit model with SGGEP meninges grafts (SGGEP-MGs). Our result showed that the SGGEP-MGs could restore the integrity of the defect very well. After 7 weeks of engraftment, there was no sign of herniation observed, the grafts were re-vascularized, and the defects were well repaired. Histologically, the boundary between the graft and the host was very well integrated and there was no strong inflammatory response. Therefore, this kind of closure could help restore the fluid and electrolyte balance and to dampen systemic inflammatory response in damge control surgery while ADM graft failed to establish re-vascularization as the same as the SGGEP-MG. It is concluded that the meninges of SGGEP could serve as a high-quality alternative for restoring the integrity of the abdominal wall, especially for damage control surgery.


Author(s):  
Jenny M. Shao ◽  
Sullivan A. Ayuso ◽  
Eva B. Deerenberg ◽  
Sharbel A. Elhage ◽  
Tanu Prasad ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 231 (4) ◽  
pp. e124-e125
Author(s):  
Malke Asaad ◽  
Donald Peter Baumann ◽  
Sahil Kuldip Kapur ◽  
Alexander F. Mericli ◽  
David Matthew Adelman ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 231 (4) ◽  
pp. S89-S90
Author(s):  
Jenny M. Shao ◽  
Eva Barbara Deerenberg ◽  
Sharbel Elhage ◽  
Kent Williams Kercher ◽  
Paul Dominick Colavita ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 83 (9) ◽  
pp. 1001-1006 ◽  
Author(s):  
David H. Livingston ◽  
David V. Feliciano

Despite advances in trauma care, a subset of patients surviving damage control cannot achieve fascial closure and require split-thickness skin grafting (STSG) of their open abdomen. Controversy exists as to whether reconstruction of the gastrointestine (GI) should be staged or performed at the time of abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR). Many surgeons do not believe that operations through the STSG can be completed safely or without loss of graft. This series reviews the outcomes of operations for GI reconstruction performed through the elevated healed STSG. Concurrent series on all patients undergoing abdominal operation through the STSG. The technique involves elevating the STSG, lysing adhesions only as needed, avoid detaching underlying omentum or viscera to avoid devascularization, and then reattaching the elevated STSG to the abdominal wall with simple sutures. From 1995 to 2017, 27 patients underwent 40 distinct procedures during 36 separate abdominal reoperations (89% GI) through the elevated STSG approach at three Level I trauma centers at a mean interval of 11 months from application of the STSG. One STSG was lost (patient closed with skin flaps), one patient had 30 per cent loss of the STSG (regrafted), and one patient had 10 per cent loss of the STSG (allowed to granulate). One patient required a small bowel resection for intraoperative enterotomy during a difficult operative dissection. There were no GI complications, intraabdominal infections, or deaths, and all patients were deemed fit to undergo AWR after three months. Major intraabdominal reoperations can be readily and safely accomplished through the elevated STSG approach with a <4 per cent need for regrafting. This staged approach significantly simplifies and increases the safety of a second stage AWR.


Author(s):  
Parag Bhanot ◽  
Kathryn S. King ◽  
Frank P. Albino

2016 ◽  
Vol 223 (4) ◽  
pp. e30
Author(s):  
Patrick B. Garvey ◽  
Salvatore Giordano ◽  
Donald P. Baumann ◽  
Jun Liu ◽  
Charles E. Butler

2012 ◽  
Vol 204 (4) ◽  
pp. 510-517 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evan W. Beale ◽  
Ronald E. Hoxworth ◽  
Edward H. Livingston ◽  
Andrew P. Trussler

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document