Analysis of radiation exposure among pediatric trauma patients at national trauma centers

2013 ◽  
Vol 74 (3) ◽  
pp. 907-911 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anupam B. Kharbanda ◽  
Andrew Flood ◽  
Karen Blumberg ◽  
Nathan S. Kreykes
2015 ◽  
Vol 78 (6) ◽  
pp. 1149-1154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry W. Ortega ◽  
Gretchen Cutler ◽  
Jill Dreyfus ◽  
Andrew Flood ◽  
Anupam Kharbanda

2017 ◽  
Vol 83 (10) ◽  
pp. 1033-1039
Author(s):  
Galinos Barmparas ◽  
Ara Ko ◽  
Navpreet K. Dhillon ◽  
James M. Tatum ◽  
Mark Choi ◽  
...  

Although guidelines for the performance of an emergency department thoracotomy (EDT) are available, high level evidence remains scarce potentially leading to variation in decisions and practices among trauma surgeons. The National Trauma Databank was queried for all subjects who died in the emergency department (ED) between 2007 and 2011. Trauma centers were divided into four quartiles based on the rate of EDTamong ED deaths. A total of 31,623 subjects admitted to 729 trauma centers met inclusion criteria. Most of of these centers (n = 328, 53%) never performed an EDT during the study period. Very few outlier centers (1.1%) performed this procedure in 50.0 per cent or more of all patients who died in the ED. Trauma centers in the highest quartiles in performing EDT were more likely to intervene with both surgical and nonsurgical procedures in patients who died in the ED, independent of the performance of an EDT. There are significant variations among trauma centers in the management of trauma patients who expire in the ED. Further research at a national level toward standardizing the management of the trauma patient in extremis and the decision to perform an EDT is necessary, given the extremely low survival associated with this procedure.


Author(s):  
Marissa A. Brunetti ◽  
Mahadevappa Mahesh ◽  
Rosemary Nabaweesi ◽  
Paul Locke ◽  
Susan Ziegfeld ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 158 (2) ◽  
pp. 315
Author(s):  
H. Basdag ◽  
T. Oyetunji ◽  
O.B. Bolorundoro ◽  
E.R. Haut ◽  
K.A. Stevens ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Hrdy ◽  
Mahadevappa Mahesh ◽  
Marlene Miller ◽  
Bruce Klein ◽  
Dylan Stewart ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 83 (11) ◽  
pp. 1241-1245
Author(s):  
Brian K. Yorkgitis ◽  
Olubode A. Olufajo ◽  
David Metcalfe ◽  
Gally Reznor ◽  
Joaquim M. Havens ◽  
...  

Trauma patients often require initial stabilization followed by transfer for ongoing trauma care. Thus, the administration of VTE prophylaxis is often delayed until admission to the receiving hospital. It is unclear if transfer status is a risk factor for VTE. The National Trauma Database v6.2 was used to identify patients admitted to Level I and II trauma centers. Exclusions included patients on anticoagulation, <18 years, known VTE before trauma, or pregnant. Patients transferred were compared with nontransferred patients. Analysis included 736,374 patients with 189,166 (25.69%) transferred patients within 24 hours of injury. Using weighted measures, VTE was identified in 11,619 (1.50%) patients. The VTE rate was significantly higher in the transferred group compared with the nontransferred group (1.73% vs 1.42%, P = 0.002) including deep venous thrombosis (1.39% vs 1.14%, P = 0.004) and pulmonary embolism (0.45% vs 0.39%, P = 0.003). Multivariable analyses adjusting for patient-level risk factors demonstrated that transfer was associated with a higher likelihood of VTE (aOR 1.18; 95% CI: 1.09–1.28, P ≤ 0.001), pulmonary embolism (aOR 1.21; 95% CI: 1.11–1.33, P ≤ 0.001), and deep venous thrombosis (aOR 1.17; 95% CI: 1.07–1.28, P = 0.0004). Transfer status of trauma patients is a risk factor for VTE. Accepting a transferred patient results in an increased VTE risk and may not be reflective of the quality of care at the receiving facility.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document