Halley the Londoner

Edmond Halley was a Londoner born and bred, he married into a London family and lived most of his life in or near London: London made his life and work possible. Halley’s public life is generally well known and documented, yet there are important gaps in the record. One was his survey and fortification of harbours in Dalmatia in 1703, at the direct command of Queen Anne, and his consequent election to the Savilian chair of geometry in 1704. 1 More generally, it has been recognized that Halley could not have done many of the things he did without influential support from powerful patrons. 2 In this article I suggest that the source of his patronage is to be found in his London connections. Halley moved in very influential circles from his schooldays at St Paul’s. He was in the party that chose the site of the Royal Observatory at Greenwich in 1675. 3 King Charles II himself promoted his expedition to St Helena and, on his return, Halley received the AM degree from Oxford at the command of Charles. It was Halley, rather than Pepys, the close associate of James II and President of the Royal Society, who presented Principia to the King. Halley seems at first to have come under suspicion from William III but had the support of Queen Mary for his later Atlantic and Channel cruises, on which, although a civilian, he was in command of Paramore and commissioned as a post-captain in the Royal Navy. His Adriatic surveys were at the direct command of Queen Anne. I believe that to understand how Halley could rely on such support we must look at his London background and connections, and in this article I consider his extended family, his links with the Tower and his associations with the London trading companies, in the early part of his life before he went to Oxford in 1704.

1885 ◽  
Vol 176 ◽  
pp. 679-689

In offering to the Royal Society some results deduced from the systems of magnetic observation and magnetic self-registration established several years since at the Royal Observatory, Greenwich, during a portion of the time in which I presided over that institution, I think it desirable to premise a short statement on the origin of the Magnetic Department of the Royal Observatory, and on the successive steps in its constitution. It appears to have been recognised many years ago, that magnetic determinations would form a proper part of the business of the Royal Observatory. When I commenced residence at the Royal Observatory, at the end of 1835, I found in the garden a small wooden building, evidently intended for the examination of compasses, perhaps of the size of those used in the Royal Navy. But the locality was inconvenient, and the structure was totally unfit for any delicate magnetic purpose; for instance, the balance-weights of the sliding windows were of iron. For some preliminary experiments a small observatory was borrowed from Captain Fitzroy, but no real progress was made in magnetism.


The Religious, Royal, and Ancient Foundation o f Christ’s Hospital is one of nine Public Schools to which the Royal Society has the privilege of nominating a member o f the governing body. Founded in 1552 by Edward VI, ‘ the boy Patron of boys,’ Christ’s Hospital came into possession of part o f the Grey Friars buildings given to the city by Henry VIII for the relief of the poor : to these buildings many additions were made in the seventeenth century and later. In the latter part o f the seventeenth century and in the eighteenth century the Royal Society and the Hospital were closely associated : Samuel Pepys had a large share in the establishment within Christ’s Hospital o f the Mathematical School founded by Charles II. A medal was struck to commemorate the new Royal Foundation, in design almost identical with the silver badge that is still worn on the left shoulder of each of the forty boys on the foundation, all of whom are sons o f commissioned officers in the Royal Navy, Royal Marines, or the Royal Naval Reserve. Dies for the medal were presented to the Hospital by Sir Isaac Newton, who was Warden and afterwards Master of the Mint. The Royal Society and Christ’s Hospital both have the honour of having as Patron His Majesty the King.


1880 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 637-656
Author(s):  
Piazzi Smyth

On the 26th of last month the full year appointed by Government Contract for the testing of the new Rock-Thermometers having expired, and they having approved themselves at all points, been accepted, and set fairly afloat on a new course of observation,—I hasten to announce the event to the Royal Society, Edinburgh, who have long had a lively interest both in these instruments and in the problems they have been employed upon.


The principal object of this paper is the connexion of the results deduced in a former paper from the observations at the Royal So­ciety’s Apartments, with the observations at the Royal Observatory at Greenwich, in order to determine mean numerical values, and to establish the laws of periodic variation from this long series of obser­vations ; the two series of observations are here induced to one and the same series. The observations at the Royal Society having been discontinued between the years 1781 and 1786, it was necessary to supply this link in the series, more particularly as these years were distinguished by very severe weather, and their omission would have a sensible effect on the results. The deficient observations have been supplied by a comparison of the observations which were made at Somerset House, with the observations during the corresponding years made by Mr. Barker at Lyndon in Rutlandshire, from 1771 to 1799, cor­rections being thus obtained for reducing the Lyndon observations to those at Somerset House.


2000 ◽  
Vol 46 ◽  
pp. 85-124
Author(s):  
P. Gray ◽  
K.J. Ivin

Frederick Sydney Dainton, Baron Dainton of Hallam Moors, was a physical chemist of international renown specializing in the fields of chain reactions, polymerization and radiation chemistry. Both formidable and friendly, and enormously industrious, his contributions to public life in this country spanned more than thirty years. When in his eighties, he commenced and very nearly completed a fascinating and attractive autobiography (to be published in 2000 by Sheffield Academic Press), which Lady Dainton has generously made available to us and on which we have drawn heavily, especially for his childhood years and for his illuminating description of the inception and development of The British Library. Among his papers, now lodged at the University of Sheffield, were found ‘some notes for the assistance of the unfortunate person charged with the task of writing my Biographical Memoir for The Royal Society’. These too we have found extremely useful, especially for the section on scientific publications. In his time Fred, as he became universally known, had written or co-written the memoirs of R.G.W. Norrish (1981), G.B. Kistiakowsky (1985) and N.N. Semenov (1990) and knew what a difficult task it could be without the assistance of any such notes. It was part of his nature to be as practically helpful as he could to other people and we are grateful for that.


1893 ◽  
Vol s8-III (65) ◽  
pp. 235-235
Author(s):  
A. Hall
Keyword(s):  

I have shown elsewhere that in 1660 and 1661 both Robert Southwell (1635-1702, later Sir Robert and P.R.S.), and Sir John Finch (1626-1682) tried to establish a correspondence between the virtuosi in England and in Florence, more especially between Prince Leopold de’ Medici and Robert Boyle, by far the most widely known English man of science at that time. For some mysterious reason the desired correspondence did not take place; Boyle did not write, but did send through Oldenburg two copies of the Latin edition of his New Experiments Physico-Mechanicall , one for the Prince and one for Vincenzo Viviani. This was in October 1661. Indeed, the only knowledge that the Royal Society obtained about the Florentine Accademia del Cimento came through Oldenburg’s French correspondents. They learned nothing substantial except that the experiments made by the Accademia were to be published all together in a book. Finally, in 1667, they were; but for several years the appearance of this work had been expected and in fact eagerly awaited throughout the learned world. As far as the experiments are concerned it could have been published as early as 1662, and the long delay can largely, though not entirely, be blamed on the Secretary who wrote it, Count Lorenzo Magalotti (1637-1712), who was a perfectionist, and a fussy one, not about natural philosophy, but about language.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document