scholarly journals Points of general relativistic shock wave interaction are ‘regularity singularities’ where space–time is not locally flat

Author(s):  
Moritz Reintjes ◽  
Blake Temple

We show that the regularity of the gravitational metric tensor in spherically symmetric space–times cannot be lifted from C 0,1 to C 1,1 within the class of C 1,1 coordinate transformations in a neighbourhood of a point of shock wave interaction in General Relativity, without forcing the determinant of the metric tensor to vanish at the point of interaction. This is in contrast to Israel's theorem, which states that such coordinate transformations always exist in a neighbourhood of a point on a smooth single shock surface. The results thus imply that points of shock wave interaction represent a new kind of regularity singularity for perfect fluids evolving in space–time, singularities that make perfectly good sense physically, that can form from the evolution of smooth initial data, but at which the space–time is not locally Minkowskian under any coordinate transformation. In particular, at regularity singularities, delta function sources in the second derivatives of the metric exist in all coordinate systems of the C 1,1 -atlas, but due to cancellation, the full Riemann curvature tensor remains supnorm bounded .

Author(s):  
Moritz Reintjes ◽  
Blake Temple

We give a constructive proof that coordinate transformations exist which raise the regularity of the gravitational metric tensor from C 0,1 to C 1,1 in a neighbourhood of points of shock wave collision in general relativity. The proof applies to collisions between shock waves coming from different characteristic families, in spherically symmetric spacetimes. Our result here implies that spacetime is locally inertial and corrects an error in our earlier Proc. R. Soc. A publication, which led us to the false conclusion that such coordinate transformations, which smooth the metric to C 1,1 , cannot exist. Thus, our result implies that regularity singularities (a type of mild singularity introduced in our Proc. R. Soc. A paper) do not exist at points of interacting shock waves from different families in spherically symmetric spacetimes. Our result generalizes Israel's celebrated 1966 paper to the case of such shock wave interactions but our proof strategy differs fundamentally from that used by Israel and is an extension of the strategy outlined in our original Proc. R. Soc. A publication. Whether regularity singularities exist in more complicated shock wave solutions of the Einstein–Euler equations remains open.


Author(s):  
Zeke Vogler ◽  
Blake Temple

We introduce the locally inertial Godunov method with dynamical time dilation , and use it to give a definitive numerical simulation of a point of shock wave interaction in general relativity starting from a new initial dataset. Prior work of Groah and Temple justifies meeting the Einstein constraint equations for the initial data only at the weak level of Lipshitz continuity in the metric. The forward time simulations, presented here, resolve the secondary wave in the Smoller–Temple shock wave model for an explosion into a static, singular, isothermal sphere. The backward time solutions indicate black hole formation from a smooth solution via collapse associated with an incoming rarefaction wave. A new feature is that space–time is approximated as locally flat in each grid cell so that Riemann problems and the Godunov method can be implemented. Clocks are then dynamically dilated to simulate effects of space–time curvature. Such points of shock wave interaction are more singular than points on single shock surfaces because the coordinate systems that make space–time locally flat on single shock surfaces (Gaussian normal coordinates), break down at points of shock wave interaction.


2018 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 105-118
Author(s):  
Volf Ya. Borovoy ◽  
Vladimir Evguenyevich Mosharov ◽  
Vladimir Nikolaevich Radchenko ◽  
Arkadii Sergeyevich Skuratov

2016 ◽  
Vol 54 (6) ◽  
pp. 905-906 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. A. Mirova ◽  
A. L. Kotel’nikov ◽  
V. V. Golub ◽  
T. V. Bazhenova

1988 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 795-797
Author(s):  
M. D. Gerasimov ◽  
A. V. Panasenko ◽  
V. F. Yatsuk

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document