scholarly journals Catch composition and life history characteristics of sharks and rays (Elasmobranchii) landed in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zoya Tyabji ◽  
Tanmay Wagh ◽  
Vardhan Patankar ◽  
Rima W. Jabado ◽  
Dipani Sutaria

ABSTRACTThe scientific literature on the diversity and biological characteristics of sharks and rays from the Andaman and Nicobar Archipelago fishing grounds is scarce and compromised by species misidentifications. We carried out systematic fish landing surveys in South Andamans from January 2017 to May 2018, a comprehensive and cost-effective way to fill this data gap. We sampled 5,742 individuals representing 57 shark and ray species. Of the 36 species of sharks and 21 species of rays landed, six species of sharks - Loxodon macrorhinus, Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos, Sphyrna lewini, Carcharhinus albimarginatus, Carcharhinus brevipinna, and Paragaelus randalli dominated landings and comprised 83.35 % of shark landings, while three species of rays were most abundant – Pateobatis jenkinsii, Himantura leoparda and H. tutul, and comprised 48.82 % of ray landings. We report size extensions for seven shark species as well as three previously unreported ray species, increasing the known diversity for the islands and for India. For sharks, mature individuals of small-bodied species (63.48 % males of total landings of species less than 1.5 m total length) and immature individuals of larger species (84.79 % males of total landings of species larger than 1.5 m total length) were mostly landed; whereas for rays, mature individuals were predominantly landed (80.71 % males of total landings) likely reflecting differences in fishing patterns as well as habitat preferences and life history stages across species. Further, juvenile sharks and gravid females were landed in large quantities which might be unsustainable in the long-term. Landings were female-biased in C. amblyrhynchos, S. lewini and P. jenkinsii, and male-biased in L. macrorhinus and H. leoparda, indicating either spatio-temporal or gear specific sexual segregation in these species. Understanding these nuances - the composition and biology of sharks and rays landed in different fisheries seasonally will inform future conservation and fishery management measures for these species in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands.

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (10) ◽  
pp. e0231069
Author(s):  
Zoya Tyabji ◽  
Tanmay Wagh ◽  
Vardhan Patankar ◽  
Rima W. Jabado ◽  
Dipani Sutaria

2020 ◽  
Vol 71 (9) ◽  
pp. 1182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Carlos Pérez-Jiménez ◽  
Armando Wakida-Kusunoki ◽  
Chrystian Hernández-Lazo ◽  
Manuel Mendoza-Carranza

Regional ecological information is relevant to the international management of vulnerable species such as sharks. On the basis of monthly fishery data (2007–2010) from two small-scale multispecies fleets, namely, the bottom longline fleet (MLL) and vertical line+shark-specific longline fleet (VL+SSL) operating on the Campeche Bank, we recorded 19 shark species. The occurrence of immature stages of 15 species, gravid females of Carcharhinus leucas, three Endangered species (Sphyrna mokarran, S. lewini, Isurus oxyrinchus) and three Vulnerable and six Near-threatened species emphasises the importance of this area. Rhizoprionodon terraenovae (42.01% of total abundance), S. lewini (24.82%) and S. tiburo (14.57%) were the most abundant species. The commercial logbooks (2007–2012) for one fleet recorded 6517 for MLL and 1617 for VL+SSL fishery trips. The general additive model indicated a maximum of shark catch rate (CR) for MLL and SSL during 2011 (mean±s.e., 49.94±8.44 and 91.38±16.07kg per 100 hooks respectively). Monthly CR for MLL was highly variable; the maximum was observed in February (15.45±21.43kg per 100 hooks), the maximum monthly CR for SSL was in January (88.04±14.85kg per 100 hooks). For MLL, a positive relation was observed between effort and CR, whereas, for SSL, no clear relation was observed.


2007 ◽  
Vol 152 (6) ◽  
pp. 1223-1228 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Datta ◽  
P. K. Chandra ◽  
A. Banerjee ◽  
R. Chakravarty ◽  
K. M. Murhekar ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 289-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Marimuthu ◽  
J. S. Yogesh Kumar ◽  
C. Raghunathan ◽  
N. V. Vinithkumar ◽  
R. Kirubagaran ◽  
...  

Nelumbo ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 50
Author(s):  
Sanjay Mishra ◽  
Jeewan Singh Jalal ◽  
Vivek C. P. ◽  
Gautam Anuj Ekka ◽  
Dinesh Kumar Agrawala ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document