scholarly journals Latent-Based Imputation of Laboratory Measures from Electronic Health Records: Case for Complex Diseases

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Abedi ◽  
M.K. Shivakumar ◽  
P. Lu ◽  
R. Hontecillas ◽  
A. Leber ◽  
...  

AbstractImputation is a key step in Electronic Health Records-mining as it can significantly affect the conclusions derived from the downstream analysis. There are three main categories that explain the missingness in clinical settings–incompleteness, inconsistency, and inaccuracy–and these can capture a variety of situations: the patient did not seek treatment, the health care provider did not enter the information, etc. We used EHR data from patients diagnosed with Inflammatory Bowel Disease from Geisinger Health System to design a novel imputation that focuses on a complex phenotype. Our approach is based on latent-based analysis integrated with clustering to group patients based on their comorbidities before imputation. IBD is a chronic illness of unclear etiology and without a complete cure. We have taken advantage of the complexity of IBD to pre-process the EHR data of 10,498 IBD patients and show that imputation can be improved using shared latent comorbidities. The R code and sample simulated input data will be available at a future time.


2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 402-404
Author(s):  
Jill Schnall ◽  
LingJiao Zhang ◽  
Jinbo Chen

For utilizing electronic health records to help design and conduct clinical trials, an essential first step is to select eligible patients from electronic health records, that is, electronic health record phenotyping. We present two novel statistical methods that can be used in the context of electronic health record phenotyping. One mitigates the requirement for gold-standard control patients in developing phenotyping algorithms, and the other effectively corrects for bias in downstream analysis introduced by study samples contaminated by ineligible subjects.



2021 ◽  
Vol 160 (6) ◽  
pp. S-417
Author(s):  
Niranjani Venkateswaran ◽  
Nana Bernasko ◽  
Andrew Tinsley ◽  
Matthew Coates ◽  
Emmanuelle Williams ◽  
...  






2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
David M Condon ◽  
Sara J Weston ◽  
Patrick Hill

The inclusion of psychosocial variables into electronic health records provides a unique opportunity for the translation of findings from social, psychological, and behavioral domains into patient care. This commentary is a response to the recommendations of a committee convened by the Institute of Medicine to address this opportunity (Matthews et al., 2016). We concur with the committee that the inclusion of psychosocial variables in electronic health records will broadly benefit researchers, practitioners, and patients and that there is clear need for a recommended panel of psychosocial measures that is ready for implementation in clinical settings. In fact, it seems likely that these recommendations will have lasting consequences. Given this, our response highlights several concerns about the recommendations and criteria. We suggest further clarification of the audience for these recommendations, reconsideration of the overly restrictive inclusion criteria, and more extensive engagement of psychosocial researchers in order to achieve broader consensus.







Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document