scholarly journals Neurobehavioural characterisation and stratification of reinforcement-related behaviour

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tianye Jia ◽  
Alex Ing ◽  
Erin Burke Quinlan ◽  
Nicole Tay ◽  
Qiang Luo ◽  
...  

Abstract:Reinforcement-related cognitive processes, such as reward processing, impulsiveness and emotional processing are critical components of externalising and internalising behaviours. It is unclear to what extent each of these processes contributes to individual behavioural symptoms, how their neural substrates give rise to distinct behavioural outcomes, and if neural profiles across different reinforcement-related processes might differentiate individual behaviours. We created a statistical framework that enabled us to directly compare functional brain activation during reward anticipation, motor inhibition and viewing of emotional faces in the European IMAGEN cohort of 2000 14-year-old adolescents. We observe significant correlations and modulation of reward anticipation and motor inhibition networks in hyperactivity, impulsivity, inattention and conduct symptoms, and describe neural signatures across neuroimaging tasks that differentiate these behaviours. We thus characterise shared and distinct functional brain activation patterns that underlie different externalising symptoms and identify neural stratification markers, while accounting for clinically observed co-morbidity.

2020 ◽  
Vol Volume 16 ◽  
pp. 1451-1458
Author(s):  
Qingrong OuYang ◽  
Yinxu Wang ◽  
Yun-Wei Zhang ◽  
Ming Yu ◽  
Xiaoming Wang

SLEEP ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian J Curtis ◽  
Paula G Williams ◽  
Jeffrey S Anderson

Abstract Study Objectives Much of what we assume about the effects of short sleep duration on neural reward processing derives from total sleep deprivation studies. Although total sleep deprivation appears rare, habitual short sleep is common: 30% of working US adults report habitually sleeping ≤ 6 hours/night. It remains largely unknown whether habitual short sleepers exhibit similar reward processing brain activation patterns to those observed following total sleep deprivation in prior studies. Therefore, our aim was to test objectively reward processing brain activation patterns associated with self-reported habitual short sleep duration in a large sample. Methods Nine hundred and fifty-two adult participants from the Human Connectome Project database were grouped on reported habitual short (≤6 hours) vs. medium-length (7–9 hours) sleep duration using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Reward processing brain activation was examined using a gambling task during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Subject-level covariates for age, sex, continuous sleep duration, daytime dysfunction, and PSQI total score are provided as supplemental analyses. Results Brain activation patterns revealed expected reward processing-related activation for age and sex. However, activation for sleep duration, dysfunction, and PSQI score did not correspond to those evident in previous total sleep deprivation studies. Conclusions Self-reported short sleep duration, perceived sleep-related dysfunction, and sleep quality via PSQI do not appear to be meaningfully associated with activation in well-described regions of the human neurobiological reward circuit. As these findings are counter to prior results using experimental sleep deprivation, future work focused on more direct comparisons between self-reported sleep variables and experimental sleep deprivation appears warranted.


2005 ◽  
Vol 32 (S 4) ◽  
Author(s):  
A.R Luft ◽  
L Forrester ◽  
F Villagra ◽  
R Macko ◽  
D.F Hanley

NeuroImage ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 448-459 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew C Papanicolaou ◽  
Eduardo Castillo ◽  
Joshua I Breier ◽  
Robert N Davis ◽  
Panagiotis G Simos ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document