scholarly journals When network bridges foster consensus. Bounded confidence models in networked societies

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hendrik Schawe ◽  
Sylvain Fontaine ◽  
Laura Hernández
Keyword(s):  
Automatica ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 129 ◽  
pp. 109683
Author(s):  
Francesco Vasca ◽  
Carmela Bernardo ◽  
Raffaele Iervolino

Complexity ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Xiaoxuan Liu ◽  
Changwei Huang ◽  
Haihong Li ◽  
Qionglin Dai ◽  
Junzhong Yang

In complex systems, agents often interact with others in two distinct types of interactions, pairwise interaction and group interaction. The Deffuant–Weisbuch model adopting pairwise interaction and the Hegselmann–Krause model adopting group interaction are the two most widely studied opinion dynamics. In this study, we propose a novel opinion dynamics by combining pairwise and group interactions for agents and study the effects of the combination on consensus in the population. In the model, we introduce a parameter α to control the weights of the two interactions in the dynamics. Through numerical simulations, we find that there exists an optimal α , which can lead to a highest probability of complete consensus and minimum critical bounded confidence for the formation of consensus. Furthermore, we show the effects of α on opinion formation by presenting the observations for opinion clusters. Moreover, we check the robustness of the results on different network structures and find the promotion of opinion consensus by α not limited to a complete graph.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 541-546 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hassan Dehghani Aghbolagh ◽  
Mohsen Zamani ◽  
Zhiyong Chen

2013 ◽  
Vol 16 (06) ◽  
pp. 1350020 ◽  
Author(s):  
NICOLAS PERONY ◽  
RENÉ PFITZNER ◽  
INGO SCHOLTES ◽  
CLAUDIO J. TESSONE ◽  
FRANK SCHWEITZER

We study the role of hierarchical structures in a simple model of collective consensus formation based on the bounded confidence model with continuous individual opinions. For the particular variation of this model considered in this paper, we assume that a bias toward an extreme opinion is introduced whenever two individuals interact and form a common decision. As a simple proxy for hierarchical social structures, we introduce a two-step decision making process in which in the second step groups of like-minded individuals are replaced by representatives once they have reached local consensus, and the representatives in turn form a collective decision in a downstream process. We find that the introduction of such a hierarchical decision making structure can improve consensus formation, in the sense that the eventual collective opinion is closer to the true average of individual opinions than without it. In particular, we numerically study how the size of groups of like-minded individuals being represented by delegate individuals affects the impact of the bias on the final population-wide consensus. These results are of interest for the design of organizational policies and the optimization of hierarchical structures in the context of group decision making.


2017 ◽  
Vol 62 (11) ◽  
pp. 5678-5693 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francois Baccelli ◽  
Avhishek Chatterjee ◽  
Sriram Vishwanath

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document