scholarly journals S-Benzyl 3-[1-(6-methylpyridin-2-yl)ethylidene]dithiocarbazate: crystal structure and Hirshfeld surface analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 74 (2) ◽  
pp. 261-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siti Aminah Omar ◽  
Chee Keong Chah ◽  
Thahira B. S. A. Ravoof ◽  
Mukesh M. Jotani ◽  
Edward R. T. Tiekink
Keyword(s):  
Crystal Structure ◽  
Hydrogen Bond ◽  
Surface Analysis ◽  
Phenyl Ring ◽  
Molecular Packing ◽  
Hirshfeld Surface ◽  
Hirshfeld Surface Analysis ◽  
Dihedral Angles ◽  
Pyridyl Ring ◽  
Relative Importance

In the title dithiocarbazate ester, C16H17N3S2 (systematic name: (Z)-{[(benzylsulfanyl)methanethioyl]amino}[1-(6-methylpyridin-2-yl)ethylidene]amine), the central methylidenehydrazinecarbodithioate (C2N2S2) core is almost planar (r.m.s. deviation = 0.0111 Å) and forms dihedral angles of 71.67 (3)° with the approximately orthogonally inclined thioester phenyl ring, and 7.16 (7)° with the approximately coplanar substituted pyridyl ring. The latter arrangement and the Z configuration about the imine-C=N bond allows for the formation of an intramolecular hydrazine-N—H...N(pyridyl) hydrogen bond that closes an S(6) loop. In the crystal, phenyl-C—H...S(thione), methylene-C—H...π(pyridyl), methylene- and phenyl-C—H...π(phenyl) contacts connect molecules into supramolecular layers propagating in the bc plane; the layers stack along the a axis with no directional interactions between them. The analysis of the Hirshfeld surface indicates the relative importance of an intralayer phenyl-H...H(pyridyl) contact upon the molecular packing.

scholarly journals 2-[(1E)-({[(Benzylsulfanyl)methanethioyl]amino}imino)methyl]-6-methoxyphenol: crystal structure and Hirshfeld surface analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 72 (4) ◽  
pp. 516-521 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enis Nadia Md Yusof ◽  
Mukesh M. Jotani ◽  
Edward R. T. Tiekink ◽  
Thahira B. S. A. Ravoof
Keyword(s):  
Crystal Structure ◽  
Hydrogen Bond ◽  
Hydrogen Bonds ◽  
Dihedral Angle ◽  
Surface Analysis ◽  
Intermolecular Interactions ◽  
Phenyl Ring ◽  
Hirshfeld Surface ◽  
Geometric Parameters ◽  
Hirshfeld Surface Analysis

The title dithiocarbazate ester, C16H16N2O2S2, comprises two almost planar residues,i.e. the phenyl ring and the remaining 14 non-H atoms (r.m.s. deviation = 0.0410 Å). These are orientated perpendicularly, forming a dihedral angle of 82.72 (5)°. An intramolecular hydroxy-O—H...N(imine) hydrogen bond, leading to anS(6) loop, is noted. An analysis of the geometric parameters is consistent with the molecule existing as the thione tautomer, and the conformation about the C=N bond isE. The thione S and imine H atoms lie to the same side of the molecule, facilitating the formation of intermolecular N—H...S hydrogen bonds leading to eight-membered {...HNCS}2synthons in the crystal. These aggregates are connected by phenyl-C—H...O(hydroxy) interactions into a supramolecular layer in thebcplane; these stack with no directional interactions between them. An analysis of the Hirshfeld surface confirms the nature of the intermolecular interactions.

scholarly journals Crystal structure and Hirshfeld surface analysis of a pyridiniminium bromide salt: 1-[2-([1,1′-biphenyl]-4-yl)-2-oxoethyl]-3-methyl-1,4-dihydropyridin-4-iminium bromide

2018 ◽  
Vol 74 (5) ◽  
pp. 752-756 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. N. Sheshadri ◽  
Huey Chong Kwong ◽  
C. S. Chidan Kumar ◽  
Ching Kheng Quah ◽  
B. P. Siddaraju ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Crystal Structure ◽  
Hydrogen Bond ◽  
Double Bond ◽  
Hydrogen Bonds ◽  
Surface Analysis ◽  
Phenyl Ring ◽  
Hirshfeld Surface ◽  
Hirshfeld Surface Analysis ◽  
Phenyl Rings ◽  
Graph Set

In the cation of the title salt, C20H19N2O+·Br−, the phenyl rings are inclined to one another by 38.38 (8)°, whereas the central phenyl ring and the pyridiniminium ring are almost perpendicular with a dihedral angle of 87.37 (9)°. The N+=C cationic double bond was verified by the shortened bond length of 1.337 (2) Å. In the crystal, the Br− anion is linked to the cation by an N—H...Br hydrogen bond. C—H...O hydrogen bonds link adjacent pyridiniminium cations into inversion dimers with an R 2 2(18) graph-set motif. These dimers are stacked in a phenyl–phenyl T-shaped geometry through C—H...π interactions. A Hirshfeld surface analysis was conducted to verify the contributions of the different intermolecular interactions.

scholarly journals 4-[(1-Benzyl-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methoxy]benzene-1,2-dicarbonitrile: crystal structure, Hirshfeld surface analysis and energy-minimization calculations

2016 ◽  
Vol 72 (4) ◽  
pp. 563-569
Author(s):  
Norzianah Shamsudin ◽  
Ai Ling Tan ◽  
David J. Young ◽  
Mukesh M. Jotani ◽  
A. Otero-de-la-Roza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Crystal Structure ◽  
Surface Analysis ◽  
Energy Minimization ◽  
Phenyl Ring ◽  
Hirshfeld Surface ◽  
Hirshfeld Surface Analysis ◽  
Dihedral Angles ◽  
Compound C ◽  
Intermolecular Contacts ◽  
Supramolecular Chains

In the solid state, the title compound, C18H13N5O, adopts a conformation whereby the phenyl ring and methoxy–benzene-1,2-dicarbonitrile residue (r.m.s. deviation of the 12 non-H atoms = 0.041 Å) lie to opposite sides of the central triazolyl ring, forming dihedral angles of 79.30 (13) and 64.59 (10)°, respectively; the dihedral angle between the outer rings is 14.88 (9)°. This conformation is nearly 7 kcal mol−1higher in energy than the energy-minimized structure which has asyndisposition of the outer rings, enabling intramolecular π–π interactions. In the crystal, methylene-C—H...N(triazolyl) and carbonitrile-N...π(benzene) interactions lead to supramolecular chains along theaaxis. Supramolecular layers in theabplane arise as the chains are connected by benzene-C—H...N(carbonitrile) interactions; layers stack with no directional interactions between them. The specified intermolecular contacts along with other, weaker contributions to the supramolecular stabilization are analysed in a Hirshfeld surface analysis.

2,4-Diamino-6-phenyl-1,3,5-triazin-1-ium nitrate: intriguing crystal structure with high Z′/Z′′ and hydrogen bond numbers and Hirshfeld surface analysis of intermolecular interactions

CrystEngComm ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicoleta Caimac ◽  
Elena Melnic ◽  
Diana Chisca ◽  
Marina S. Fonari
Keyword(s):  
Crystal Structure ◽  
Hydrogen Bond ◽  
Surface Analysis ◽  
Intermolecular Interactions ◽  
Title Compound ◽  
Ionic Species ◽  
Hirshfeld Surface ◽  
Hirshfeld Surface Analysis ◽  
Asymmetric Unit ◽  
Space Group

The title compound crystallises in the triclinic centrosymmetric space group P1̄ with an intriguing high number of crystallographically unique binary salt-like adducts (Z′ = 8) and a total number of ionic species (Z′′ = 16) in the asymmetric unit.

scholarly journals Crystal structure, Hirshfeld surface analysis and interaction energy calculation of 4-(furan-2-yl)-2-(6-methyl-2,4-dioxopyran-3-ylidene)-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-1,5-benzodiazepine

2021 ◽  
Vol 77 (8) ◽  
pp. 834-838
Author(s):  
Mohamed El Hafi ◽  
Sanae Lahmidi ◽  
Lhoussaine El Ghayati ◽  
Tuncer Hökelek ◽  
Joel T. Mague ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Crystal Structure ◽  
Hydrogen Bond ◽  
Surface Analysis ◽  
Crystal Packing ◽  
Hirshfeld Surface ◽  
Hirshfeld Surface Analysis ◽  
Energy Calculation ◽  
Boat Conformation ◽  
Stacking Interactions ◽  
Π Stacking

The title compound {systematic name: (S,E)-3-[4-(furan-2-yl)-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-benzo[b][1,4]diazepin-2-ylidene]-6-methyl-2H-pyran-2,4(3H)-dione}, C19H16N2O4, is constructed from a benzodiazepine ring system linked to furan and pendant dihydropyran rings, where the benzene and furan rings are oriented at a dihedral angle of 48.7 (2)°. The pyran ring is modestly non-planar [largest deviation of 0.029 (4) Å from the least-squares plane] while the tetrahydrodiazepine ring adopts a boat conformation. The rotational orientation of the pendant dihydropyran ring is partially determined by an intramolecular N—HDiazp...ODhydp (Diazp = diazepine and Dhydp = dihydropyran) hydrogen bond. In the crystal, layers of molecules parallel to the bc plane are formed by N—HDiazp...ODhydp hydrogen bonds and slipped π–π stacking interactions. The layers are connected by additional slipped π–π stacking interactions. A Hirshfeld surface analysis of the crystal structure indicates that the most important contributions for the crystal packing are from H...H (46.8%), H...O/O...H (23.5%) and H...C/C...H (15.8%) interactions, indicating that van der Waals interactions are the dominant forces in the crystal packing. Computational chemistry indicates that in the crystal the N—H...O hydrogen-bond energy is 57.5 kJ mol−1.

scholarly journals Crystal structure and Hirshfeld surface analysis of 1-(4-chlorophenyl)-2-{[5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl]sulfanyl}ethanone

2017 ◽  
Vol 73 (4) ◽  
pp. 524-527
Author(s):  
Rajesh Kumar ◽  
Shafqat Hussain ◽  
Khalid M. Khan ◽  
Shahnaz Perveen ◽  
Sammer Yousuf
Keyword(s):  
Crystal Structure ◽  
Hydrogen Bonding ◽  
Surface Analysis ◽  
Title Compound ◽  
Crystal Packing ◽  
Hirshfeld Surface ◽  
Hirshfeld Surface Analysis ◽  
Dihedral Angles ◽  
Compound C ◽  
Benzene Rings

In the title compound, C16H10Cl2N2O2S, the dihedral angles formed by the chloro-substituted benzene rings with the central oxadiazole ring are 6.54 (9) and 6.94 (8)°. In the crystal, C—H...N hydrogen bonding links the molecules into undulating ribbons running parallel to thebaxis. Hirshfeld surface analysis indicates that the most important contributions for the crystal packing are the H...C (18%), H...H (17%), H...Cl (16.6%), H...O (10.4%), H...N (8.9%) and H...S (5.9%) interactions.

scholarly journals Crystal structure and Hirshfeld surface analysis of ethyl 6′-amino-2′-(chloromethyl)-5′-cyano-2-oxo-1,2-dihydrospiro[indoline-3,4′-pyran]-3′-carboxylate

2021 ◽  
Vol 77 (7) ◽  
pp. 739-743
Author(s):  
Farid N. Naghiyev ◽  
Maria M. Grishina ◽  
Victor N. Khrustalev ◽  
Mehmet Akkurt ◽  
Afet T. Huseynova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Crystal Structure ◽  
Hydrogen Bond ◽  
Hydrogen Bonds ◽  
Surface Analysis ◽  
Molecular Conformation ◽  
Hirshfeld Surface ◽  
Van Der Waals Interactions ◽  
Hirshfeld Surface Analysis ◽  
Compound C ◽  
Ring Motif

The molecular conformation of the title compound, C17H14ClN3O4, is stabilized by an intramolecular C—H...O contact, forming an S(6) ring motif. In the crystal, the molecules are connected by N—H...O hydrogen-bond pairs along the b-axis direction as dimers with R 2 2(8) and R 2 2(14) ring motifs and as ribbons formed by intermolecular C—H...N hydrogen bonds. There are weak van der Waals interactions between the ribbons. The most important contributions to the surface contacts are from H...H (34.9%), O...H/H...O (19.2%), C...H/H...C (11.9%), Cl...H/H...Cl (10.7%) and N...H/H...N (10.4%) interactions, as concluded from a Hirshfeld surface analysis.

scholarly journals Crystal structures and Hirshfeld surface analysis of a series of 4-O-arylperfluoropyridines

2019 ◽  
Vol 75 (8) ◽  
pp. 1102-1107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew J. Peloquin ◽  
Cynthia A. Corley ◽  
Sonya K. Adas ◽  
Gary J. Balaich ◽  
Scott T. Iacono
Keyword(s):  
Crystal Structures ◽  
Aromatic Ring ◽  
Dihedral Angle ◽  
Surface Analysis ◽  
Phenyl Ring ◽  
Pyridine Ring ◽  
Hirshfeld Surface ◽  
Hirshfeld Surface Analysis ◽  
Dihedral Angles ◽  
Twofold Axis

Five new crystal structures of perfluoropyridine substituted in the 4-position with phenoxy, 4-bromophenoxy, naphthalen-2-yloxy, 6-bromonaphthalen-2-yloxy, and 4,4′-biphenoxy are reported, viz. 2,3,5,6-tetrafluoro-4-phenoxypyridine, C11H5F4NO (I), 4-(4-bromophenoxy)-2,3,5,6-tetrafluoropyridine, C11H4BrF4NO (II), 2,3,5,6-tetrafluoro-4-[(naphthalen-2-yl)oxy]pyridine, C15H7F4NO (III), 4-[(6-bromonaphthalen-2-yl)oxy]-2,3,5,6-tetrafluoropyridine, C15H6BrF4NO (IV), and 2,2′-bis[(perfluoropyridin-4-yl)oxy]-1,1′-biphenyl, C22H8F8N2O2 (V). The dihedral angles between the aromatic ring systems in I–IV are 78.74 (8), 56.35 (8), 74.30 (7), and 64.34 (19)°, respectively. The complete molecule of V is generated by a crystallographic twofold axis: the dihedral angle between the pyridine ring and adjacent phenyl ring is 80.89 (5)° and the equivalent angle between the biphenyl rings is 27.30 (5)°. In each crystal, the packing is driven by C—H...F interactions, along with a variety of C—F...π, C—H...π, C—Br...N, C—H...N, and C—Br...π contacts. Hirshfeld surface analysis was conducted to aid in the visualization of these various influences on the packing.

scholarly journals Crystal structure and Hirshfeld surface analysis of 1-(4-bromophenyl)-2-{[5-(pyridin-3-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl]sulfanyl}ethan-1-one

2017 ◽  
Vol 73 (4) ◽  
pp. 623-626
Author(s):  
Huma Bano ◽  
Shafqat Hussain ◽  
Khalid M. Khan ◽  
Shahnaz Perveen ◽  
Sammer Yousuf
Keyword(s):  
Crystal Structure ◽  
Hydrogen Bonds ◽  
Surface Analysis ◽  
Title Compound ◽  
Hirshfeld Surface ◽  
Hirshfeld Surface Analysis ◽  
Dihedral Angles ◽  
Compound C

In the title compound, C15H10BrN3O2S, the dihedral angles between the 1,3,4-oxadiazole ring and the 3-pyridinyl and bromobenzene rings are 12.17 (15) and 18.74 (15)°, respectively. In the crystal, the molecules are linked into [100] chains by way of C—H...O, C—H...N, C—H...S hydrogen bonds. The Hirshfeld surface analysis indicates that the most important contributions to the packing are H...H (19.5%), N...H (17.3%), C...H (15.5%), Br...H (11.7%), and O...H (11.0%) interactions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document