Crystal structure, DFT and Hirshfeld surface analysis of N-acetyl-t-3-methyl-r-2,c-6-diphenylpiperidine

In the title compound [systematic name: 1-(3-methyl-2,6-diphenylpiperidin-1-yl)ethanone], C20H23NO, the piperidine ring adopts a distorted boat conformation, while the phenyl rings subtend a dihedral angle 65.1 (2)°. In the crystal, molecules are linked by C—H...O hydrogen bonds into chains extending along the b-axis direction. The DFT/B3LYP/6–311 G(d,p) method was used to determine the HOMO–LUMO energy levels. A Hirshfeld surface analysis was conducted to verify the contributions of the different intermolecular interactions, indicating that the important contributions to the crystal packing are from H...H (73.2%), C...H (18.4%) and O...H (8.4%) interactions.

Crystal structure and Hirshfeld surface analysis of the hydrated 2:1 adduct of piperazine-1,4-diium 3,5-dinitro-2-oxidobenzoate and piperazine

The crystal structure of the adduct piperazine-1,4-diium 3,5-dinitro-2-oxidobenzoate–piperazine–water (2/1/2) shows the existence of a 3,5-dinitrosalicylate dianion (DNSA2−) and a protonated piperazine-1,4-diium cation (PIP2+) along with a piperazine molecule. The formula of the title adduct in the asymmetric unit is 2C4H12N2 2+·2C7H2N2O7 2−·C4H10N2·2H2O with Z = 1. The piperazine ring in the piperazine-1,4-diium cation and in the neutral piperazine molecule adopt chair conformations. All O atoms in the DNSA2− moiety and the water molecule act as hydrogen-bonding acceptors for various intermolecular O—H...O, N—H...O and C—H...O interactions, which stabilize the crystal structure. Various supramolecular architectures formed by the different intermolecular interactions are discussed. The relative contribution of various intermolecular contacts is analysed with the aid of two-dimensional (full and decomposed) fingerprint plots, indicating that H...O/O...H (50.2%) and H...H (36.2%) contacts are the major contributors to the stabilization of the crystal structure.

Crystal structure from X-ray powder diffraction data, DFT-D calculation, Hirshfeld surface analysis, and energy frameworks of (RS)-trichlormethiazide

The structure of racemic (RS)-trichlormethiazide [systematic name: (RS)-6-chloro-3-(dichloromethyl)-1,1-dioxo-3,4-dihydro-2H-1λ6,2,4-benzothiadiazine-7-sulfonamide], C8H8Cl3N3O4S2 (RS-TCMZ), a diuretic drug used in the treatment of oedema and hypertension, was determined from laboratory X-ray powder diffraction data using DASH [David et al. (2006). J. Appl. Cryst. 39, 910–915.], refined by the Rietveld method with TOPAS-Academic [Coelho (2018). J. Appl. Cryst. 51, 210–218], and optimized using DFT-D calculations. The extended structure consists of head-to-tail dimers connected by π–π interactions which, in turn, are connected by C—Cl...π interactions. They form chains propagating along [101], further connected by N—H...O hydrogen bonds to produce layers parallel to the ac plane that stack along the b-axis direction, connected by additional N—H...O hydrogen bonds. The Hirshfeld surface analysis indicates a major contribution of H...O and H...Cl interactions (32.2 and 21.7%, respectively). Energy framework calculations confirm the major contribution of electrostatic interactions (E elec) to the total energy (E tot). A comparison with the structure of S-TCMZ is also presented.

Synthesis, crystal structure and Hirshfeld surface analysis of 1-ferrocenylundecane-1,11-diol

The racemic title compound, [Fe(C5H5)(C16H27O2)], comprises an α,ω-diol-substituted undecyl chain with a ferrocenyl substituent at at one terminus. The alkane chain is inclined to the substituted ring of the ferrocene grouping by 84.22 (13)°. The ferrocene rings are almost eclipsed and parallel. The crystal structure features O—H...O and C—H...O hydrogen bonds and C—H...π contacts that stack the molecules along the c-axis direction. A Hirshfeld surface analysis reveals that H...H interactions (83.2%) dominate the surface contacts.

Crystal structure and Hirshfeld surface analysis of (Z)-4-{[4-(3-methyl-3-phenylcyclobutyl)thiazol-2-yl]amino}-4-oxobut-2-enoic acid

The title cyclobutyl compound, C18H18N2O3S, was synthesized by the interaction of 4-(3-methyl-3-phenylcyclobutyl)thiazol-2-amine and maleic anhydride, and crystallizes in the orthorhombic space group P212121 with Z′ = 1. The molecular geometry is partially stabilized by an intramolecular N—H...O hydrogen bond forming an S 1 1(7) ring motif. The molecule is non-planar with a dihedral angle of 88.29 (11)° between the thiazole and benzene rings. In the crystal, the molecules are linked by O—H...N hydrogen bonds, forming supramolecular ribbons with C 1 1(9) chain motifs. To further analyze the intermolecular interactions, a Hirshfeld surface analysis was performed. The results indicate that the most important contributions to the overall surface are from H...H (43%), C...H (18%), O...H (17%) and N...H (6%), interactions.

Crystal structure and Hirshfeld surface analysis of 1-[(benzyldimethylsilyl)methyl]-1-ethylpiperidin-1-ium ethanesulfonate

The title molecular salt, C17H30NSi+·C2H5O4S−, belongs to the class of a-aminosilanes and was synthesized by the alkylation of 1-[(benzyldimethylsilyl)methyl]piperidine using diethyl sulfate. This achiral salt crystallizes in the chiral space group P21. One of the Si—C bonds in the cation is unusually long [1.9075 (12) Å], which correlates with the adjacent quaternary N+ atom and was verified by quantum chemical calculations. In the crystal, the components are linked by weak C—H...O hydrogen bonds: a Hirshfeld surface analysis was performed to further investigate these intermolecular interactions and their effects on the crystal packing.

Synthesis, crystal structure and Hirshfeld surface analysis of dimethyl 3-(3-bromophenyl)-6-methyl-7-oxo-3,5,6,7-tetrahydropyrazolo[1,2-a]pyrazole-1,2-dicarboxylate

The title compound, C17H17BrN2O5, resulted from the 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reaction between dimethyl acetylenedicarboxylate and (3-bromobenzylidene)-4-methyl-5-oxopyrazolidin-2-ium-1-ide in CHCl3. The dihedral angle between the pyrazole rings (all atoms) is 32.91 (10)°; the oxo-pyrazole ring displays an envelope conformation whereas the other pyrazole ring adopts a twisted conformation. The bromophenyl ring subtends a dihedral angle of 88.95 (9)° with the mean plane of its attached pyrazole ring. In the crystal, the molecules are linked by C—H...O hydrogen bonds and aromatic π–π interactions with an inter-centroid distance of 3.8369 (10) Å. The Hirshfeld surface analysis and fingerprint plots reveal that the molecular packing is governed by H...H (37.1%), O...H/H...O (31.3%), Br...H/H...Br (13.5%) and C...H/H...C (10.6%) contacts. The energy framework indicates that dispersion energy is the major contributor to the molecular packing.

Crystal structure and Hirshfeld surface analysis of (S)-N-methyl-1-phenylethan-1-aminium chloride

The title compound C9H14N+·Cl−, (1), can be synthesized starting from (S)-N-methyl-1-phenylethan-1-amine (2). Compound 2 upon addition of HCl·Et2O leads to crystallization of compound 1 as colorless blocks. The configuration of compound 1 is stable as well as preserved in space group P212121. Ammonium chlorides, like the title compound, are often observed as undesirable by-products in aminosilylation of chlorosilanes. Additionally, these by-products are usually soluble in selected organic solvents, which require difficult separation steps. Therefore, detailed studies on structural features and intermolecular interactions performed by Hirshfeld atom refinement (HAR) using NoSpherA2 [Kleemiss et al. (2021). Chem. Sci. 12, 1675–1692] and Hirshfeld surface analysis were used to address structural issues on that separation problem.

4-[(Benzylamino)carbonyl]-1-methylpyridinium halogenide salts: X-ray diffraction study and Hirshfeld surface analysis

Two salts of 4-[(benzylamino)carbonyl]-1-methylpyridinium (Am) with chloride (C14H15N2O+·Cl−) and bromide (C14H15N2O+·Br−) anions were studied and compared with the iodide salt. AmCl crystallizes in the centrosymmetric space group P21/n while AmBr and AmI form crystals in the Sohncke space group P212121. Crystals of AmBr are isostructural to those of AmI. The cation and anion are bound by an N–H...Hal hydrogen bond. Hirshfeld surface analysis was used to compare different types of intermolecular interactions in the three structures under study.