Management criteria of automated order picking systems in high‐rotation high‐volume distribution centers

2006 ◽  
Vol 106 (9) ◽  
pp. 1359-1383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio C. Caputo ◽  
Pacifico M. Pelagagge
Logistics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 32
Author(s):  
Wim Lambrechts ◽  
Jessica S. Klaver ◽  
Lennart Koudijzer ◽  
Janjaap Semeijn

Order picking is a logistics component of warehouse operations where substantial productivity gains are possible. In this study, we investigate implementation processes of collaborative order picking robots (cobots) and focus on the influence of human factors on their implementation in high volume distribution centres. These human factors are: resistance to change; organisational culture; communication on change; and leadership. Four case companies were selected that have experience with testing and introducing several types of cobot and have successfully implemented (at least) one type of cobot over an extended period. In-depth interviews with operational decision-makers led to the identification of 66 critical incidents related to human factors. The results demonstrate the importance of planning the implementation process in phases. Employees are hesitant or resistant to the change due to a lack of information, experience, and communication. The decisive role of the team leader is crucial to implement cobots successfully, and here the individual character traits (e.g., the variance in commitment, character, and motivation) influence the process as well. Although the introduction of cobots is not yet widespread, and the negative impact on the workforce (i.e., concerning job loss) is currently low, one should be aware of the possible future implications when robotisation becomes structurally embedded. Therefore, this article calls for a stronger link between human factors and the future of work, with a specific focus on reskilling and upskilling of logistics professionals in light of robotisation, rather than binary approaches in which robots are primarily seen as a threat to the current workforce.


2020 ◽  
Vol 67 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nils Boysen ◽  
David Füßler ◽  
Konrad Stephan

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (18) ◽  
pp. 6345
Author(s):  
Julián Balanta-Melo ◽  
Albio Gutiérrez ◽  
Gustavo Sinisterra ◽  
María del Mar Díaz-Posso ◽  
David Gallego ◽  
...  

The ongoing Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has triggered the paralysis of dental services ascribed to the potential spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-CoV-2. Aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs) are common in dentistry, which in turn increase the risk of infection of the dental personnel due to the salivary presence of SARS-CoV-2 in COVID-19 patients. The use of rubber dam isolation (RDI) and high-volume evacuators (HVE) during AGPs is recommended to control dental aerosols, but the evidence about their effectiveness is scarce. This first study aimed to compare, in a simulated patient, the effectiveness of the following strategies: standard suction (SS), RDI and RDI + HVE. Using the laser diffraction technique, the effect of each condition on the volume distribution, average size and concentration of coarse (PM10), fine (PM2.5) and ultrafine (PM0.1) particles were evaluated. During the teeth drilling, the highest volume fraction of dental aerosol particles with SS was below 1 μm of aerodynamic diameter. Additionally, the RDI + HVE significantly reduced both the ultrafine dental aerosol particles and the concentration of total particulate matter. AGPs represent a potential risk for airborne infections in dentistry. Taken together, these preliminary results suggest that isolation and high-volume suction are effective to reduce ultrafine dental aerosol particles.


2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 344-355
Author(s):  
Xiaosong Zhao ◽  
Na Liu ◽  
Shumeng Zhao ◽  
Jinhui Wu ◽  
Kun Zhang ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 345-350 ◽  
Author(s):  
Battini Daria ◽  
Calzavara Martina ◽  
Persona Alessandro ◽  
Sgarbossa Fabio

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document