Purpose
This study aims to examine the economic role of politics on corporate governance reforms in one of emerging market, namely, Malaysia.
Design/methodology/approach
The paper is based upon a literature review analysis.
Findings
The Malaysian economic, political and social settings have resulted in undue state and detrimental political influence on business, and yet the corporate governance reforms undertaken seemed not be able to resolve the matter. It is suggesting that it would be beneficial for Malaysia to have more independent regulatory bodies representing a wide variety of stakeholders to improve the transparency and accountability to ensure that the reforms are effectively enforced without conflicting with the political agenda. Legal institutional reforms also may be needed to improve the structure, capacity and performance of judicial system, as it is capable to capture reliance of economic role of politics and promoting accountability in Malaysia.
Research limitations/implications
The economic role of politics on corporate governance reforms is merely to broaden the political strategy in the corporate sector as the change in politics can improve the effectiveness of corporate governance reforms. Moreover, the economic role of politics raises the tone of the corporate governance reforms, and it implies that policymakers need to have effective corporate governance strategy in dealing with the reforms initiatives in areas that have strong political interventions.
Originality/value
Regulatory and judicial implications are offered as a means to improve corporate governance in Malaysia.
Financial reporting quality following the corporate governance reforms: A conditional conservatism perspective
