Simulation of particles screening in pulsating negative pressure shale shaker by coupling CFD and DEM

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng Yin ◽  
Yongjun Hou ◽  
Xianjin Wu

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to obtain the combination of working parameters suitable for pulsating negative pressure shale shaker through simulation, which is conducive to efficient recovery of clean drilling fluid and relatively dry cuttings.Design/methodology/approachShale shaker is still one of the main equipment in solid–solid and solid–liquid separation processes in drilling industry. This research is based on a new drilling fluids circulation treatment device, namely pulsating negative pressure shale shaker. In this work, a numerical study of particle flow and separation in the pulsating negative pressure shale shaker is carried out by coupling computational fluid dynamics/discrete element method (CFD-DEM). The effect of vibration parameters and negative pressure parameters are studied in terms of conveyance velocity and percent through screen.FindingsThe results show that, conveyance velocity of particle is mainly affected by vibration parameters, negative pressure in pulsating form can effectively prevent cuttings from sticking to the screen. Vibration parameters and pulsating airflow velocity peak have great influence on percent through screen, while vibration frequency and screen slope have influence on the time when the percent through screen reaches stability.Originality/valueIn this paper, the authors put forward a new kind of drilling waste fluid treatment equipment, and focused on the study of particle movement law. The results have important guiding significance for the selection of structural design parameters and rational use of equipment. In addition, the new device provides a new idea for solid–liquid separation method, which is one of the hot topics in current research.

2011 ◽  
Vol 171 (1) ◽  
pp. 350-356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Zou ◽  
Hong Zhu ◽  
Fanghui Wang ◽  
Haiyun Sui ◽  
Jiantao Fan

2007 ◽  
Vol 56 (6) ◽  
pp. 105-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.J.G. du Toit ◽  
M.C. Ramphao ◽  
V. Parco ◽  
M.C. Wentzel ◽  
G.A. Ekama

The use of immersed membranes for solid-liquid separation in biological nutrient removal activated sludge (BNRAS) systems was investigated at lab scale. Two laboratory-scale BNR activated sludge systems were run in parallel, one a MBR system and the other a conventional system with secondary settling tanks. Both systems were in 3 reactor anaerobic, anoxic, aerobic UCT configurations. The systems were set up to have, as far as possible, identical design parameters such as reactor mass fractions, recycles and sludge age. Differences were the influent flow and total reactor volumes, and the higher reactor concentrations in the MBR system. The performances of the two systems were extensively monitored and compared to identify and quantify the influence of the membranes on system response. The MBR UCT system exhibited COD, FSA, TKN, TP and TSS removals that were consistently equivalent or superior to the conventional system. Better P removal in the MBR was attributed to lower observed P uptake in the anoxic zone. High nitrate loads to the anoxic reactor appeared to be the determining factor in stimulating P uptake. The MBR UCT system had a greater sludge production than the conventional system. This was partly attributable to the retention of all solids in the MBR reactor. For steady state design this increase is accommodated by increasing the influent unbiodegradable particulate COD fraction. Additionally an attempt was made to determine the Alpha values in the oxygen transfer rate. This paper briefly summarises and compares the results from both systems, and the conclusions that can be drawn from these results.


2021 ◽  
Vol 164 ◽  
pp. 106825
Author(s):  
Xiaoyu Tang ◽  
Shihao He ◽  
Facheng Qiu ◽  
Xianfeng Qin ◽  
Xuejun Quan ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua Tyler Brown ◽  
Teng Teeh Lim ◽  
Joseph Zulovich ◽  
Christine Costello

2009 ◽  
Vol 142 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Bauer ◽  
Herwig Mayr ◽  
Katharina Hopfner-Sixt ◽  
Thomas Amon

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document