Anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing disclosure by money exchange providers in the GCC countries

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Md Abubakar Siddique ◽  
Haitham Nobanee ◽  
Osama Fayez Atayah ◽  
Mohammed Khereldin Bayzid
Keyword(s):  
Money Laundering ◽  
Design Methodology ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Counter Terrorism ◽  
Gcc Countries ◽  
Terrorism Financing ◽  
Financial Action Task ◽  
High Degree ◽  
Practical Implications

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to measure anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing (CTF) disclosures by money exchanger providers in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries. Design/methodology/approach The authors conduct a content analysis on firms’ websites to compare their AML/CTF disclosure against the recommendations of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF). The authors use a one-sample t-test to examine the degree of these disclosures. Findings Overall, money exchange providers in GCC countries do not demonstrate a high degree of AML/CTF disclosure (20.27%). Country-wise disclosure levels are: Qatar 31%, UAE 19%, Kuwait 17.1%, Oman 26.27%, Bahrain 23.27% and KSA 6.1%. Research limitations/implications The study contributes immensely to understanding the disclosure behavior of this sector. It also helps in assessing their compliance with FATF recommendations. Practical implications The results show poor AML/CTF disclosure and compliance by money exchange providers, which should lead to increased regulations by policymakers and more disclosure by practitioners. Social implications Money laundering (ML) and terrorism financing (TF) can adversely affect societies. This study should help regulators to identify vulnerable areas in ML and TF activities, compare disclosures by companies in their countries with those of other countries and identify areas for improvement. Originality/value The study is a novel attempt. No study has been undertaken before to investigate AML and CTF disclosure by money exchange providers either globally, regionally or in any country.

Designated non-financial businesses and professions

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 247-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Newbury
Keyword(s):  
Money Laundering ◽  
Financial Institutions ◽  
Design Methodology ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Objective Assessment ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Counter Terrorism ◽  
Terrorism Financing ◽  
Financial Action Task ◽  
Practical Implications

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to highlight vulnerabilities in Australia’s anti-money laundering/counter-terrorism financing (AML/CTF) regime through Australia’s non-compliance with the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) recommendations on the regulation of designated non-financial businesses and professions (DNFBPs). It is intended that through examination of the justifications for and against AML/CTF regulation of DNFBPs, the paper will provide support for the position that Australia’s AML/CTF regime should incorporate regulation of DNFBPs. Design/methodology/approach The paper presents findings from research conducted in 2015 that focused on some of the principal arguments for and against the extension of Australia’s AML/CTF regime to DNFBPs. Review and consideration of the merits of these arguments is undertaken to support the conclusion that AML/CTF regulation should be extended to DNFBPs, in line with the FATF recommendations. Findings The current exemption of many DNFBPs from AML/CTF regulation perpetuates vulnerabilities within Australia’s AML/CTF regime; until this is addressed, criminals will continue to exploit these vulnerabilities and the regulated AML/CTF sector will continue to shoulder an unfair burden of Australia’s AML/CTF response. Practical implications This paper provides an objective assessment of factors for and against the regulation of DNFBPs in Australia. It may be of value to government policymakers, regulators, financial institutions and DNFBPs. Originality/value This paper complements existing research on this subject and provides a specific focus on some of the main arguments for and against the extension of Australia’s AML/CTF regime to specific DNFBPs.

scholarly journals Could banning virtual assets be a breach of the doctrine of legitimate expectation?

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Md. Zahurul Haq ◽  
Kazi Fahmida Farzana ◽  
Moniruzzaman Md
Keyword(s):  
Money Laundering ◽  
Design Methodology ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Legitimate Expectation ◽  
Legal Obligations ◽  
Global Standards ◽  
Financial Action Task ◽  
Practical Implications

Purpose This paper aims to examine the validity of a state’s prohibition on virtual assets in the context of its global commitment to battle against money laundering. Design/methodology/approach This was empirical legal research exploring how a general lack of expertise to apply a risk-based approach in anti-money laundering strategies might have implications for invoking the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) exclusion provisions in virtual asset regulation. Findings Invoking the exclusion provisions for banning virtual assets without meeting the prerequisites may put the financial system at risk and make a jurisdiction’s legal obligations appear breached. Research limitations/implications Anti-money laundering (AML) policymakers will take precautions and avoid misuse of the liberties they enjoy under FATF exclusion clauses/provisions. Practical implications The results of this study will help ensure more informed decision-making on the legal status and regulation of virtual assets. Originality/value The study helps ascertain the limits of privileges accorded to states under FATF exclusion provisions in applying global standards against money laundering.

Tax evasion and money laundering: a complete framework

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Deen Kemsley ◽  
Sean A. Kemsley ◽  
Frank T. Morgan
Keyword(s):  
Money Laundering ◽  
Tax Evasion ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Regulatory Agencies ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Single Process ◽  
Financial Action Task ◽  
Tax Savings ◽  
Practical Implications ◽  
Complete Framework

Purpose This paper aims to define the fundamental nexus between income tax evasion and money laundering. The G7 Financial Action Task Force (FATF) designates tax evasion as a predicate offense for money laundering. We determine whether this designation is complete from a conceptual standpoint, or whether there is a stronger connection between tax evasion and money laundering. Design/methodology/approach This paper applies the FATF definition for money laundering – as well as generally accepted definitions for tax evasion and for a standard predicate offense – to identify the necessary conditions for each crime. This paper then uses these conditions to test opposing hypotheses regarding the nexus between tax evasion and money laundering. Findings This paper demonstrates that tax evasion does not meet the conditions for a standard predicate offense, and treating it as if it were a standard predicate could be problematic in practice. Instead, it is concluded that the FATF’s predicate label for tax evasion, together with tax evasion methods and objectives, imply that all tax evasion constitutes money laundering. In a single process, tax evasion generates both criminal tax savings and launders those criminal proceeds by concealing or disguising their unlawful origin. Practical implications The FATF could strengthen its framework by explicitly defining all tax evasion as money laundering. This would enable regulatory agencies to draw upon the full combined resources dedicated to either offense. Originality/value The analysis demonstrates that tax evasion completely incorporates money laundering as currently defined by the FATF.

International commercial arbitrator addressing money laundering sua sponte

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Todor Kolarov
Keyword(s):  
Money Laundering ◽  
Design Methodology ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Practical Application ◽  
Commercial Arbitration ◽  
Financial Action Task Force ◽  
Content Type ◽  
International Commercial Arbitration ◽  
Financial Action Task

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the existing legal basis, and its practical application, of an arbitrator’s competence to raise on her own initiative money laundering issues. Design/methodology/approach The research focusses on presenting the essence of the problem through evaluation of the legal basis for the arbitrators to raise money laundering concerns on their own initiative and the examples of so being done in international commercial arbitration. Findings This paper concludes that arbitrators do not presently have a solid legal basis that authorises them to act sua sponte against money laundering. Originality/value The originality and value of this paper lies in its emphasis on theoretical and practical issues related to money laundering in international commercial arbitration. It argues in favour of an explicit recommendation to be incorporated in the 2012 Recommendations of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) that international commercial arbitrators address money laundering on their own initiative.

New developments in Hong Kong’s anti-money laundering laws

2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 291-297 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Kwok
Keyword(s):  
Money Laundering ◽  
Financial Institutions ◽  
Design Methodology ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Case Law ◽  
New Developments ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Proceeds Of Crime ◽  
Financial Action Task ◽  
Law And Legislation

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to discuss briefly new developments in Hong Kong’s (HK) Anti-Money Laundering (AML) laws, both in terms of case law and legislation. Design/methodology/approach In terms of case law, the author discusses two decisions given by HK’s Court of Final Appeal relating to the dealing of proceeds of crime offence. Also, a guideline case on sentencing is also examined. In terms of legislation, the author briefly outlines the main provisions of the newly enacted AML and Counter-Terrorist Financing (Financial Institutions) Ordinance. Findings As suggested by the Financial Action Task Force, new measures need to be put in place. The AML laws, as they presently stand, need further improvement. Originality/value A good AML regime is necessary as HK continues to thrive as a major financial/banking centre in Asia. This paper seeks to encourage more discussion on the topic.

The financial action taskforce and money laundering: critical analysis of the Panama papers and the role of the United Kingdom

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aisha Hassan Al-Emadi
Keyword(s):  
Money Laundering ◽  
Design Methodology ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Content Type ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Rapid Changes ◽  
Financial Action Task ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Desk Review

Purpose This paper aims to study the effectiveness of the implementation of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) recommendations in the UK in an attempt to combat the laundering of proceeds of corruption. Design/methodology/approach A desk review of secondary resources was conducted to analyze available literature to examine the research topic. Findings The leakage of 11.5 million documents, known as the Panama papers, has revealed that the UK functioned as a safe haven for illicit and corrupt money. In an attempt to address this, the country called for a public registry of beneficial owners to disclose the identities of the owners of the incorporated corporations and to extend them to individuals abroad holding UK property. The FATF report recognizes the UK’s far-reaching regulation. Despite the measures taken, UK still faces serious risks with regard to the laundering of criminal proceeds, which demonstrates that technical compliance with FATF rules is not enough to effectively curb money laundering. Originality/value This study suggests that FATF rules’ effectiveness in identifying instances of laundering the proceeds of corruption is limited because of the deeply rooted system vulnerabilities and the rapid changes in money laundering trends.

An analysis of the obligations of gambling entities under the FATF's 2003 anti‐money laundering recommendations

2006 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jackie Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Money Laundering ◽  
Design Methodology ◽  
Due Diligence ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Suspicious Transaction ◽  
Financial Action Task ◽  
Customer Due Diligence ◽  
Business Sectors ◽  
Practical Implications ◽  
Consultation Paper

PurposeTo highlight the compliance issues which face gambling entities with the implementation of the Financial Action Task Force's (FATF's) 2003 Forty RecommendationsDesign/methodology/approachTo determine the gambling sector's attitudes towards the FATF's new anti‐money recommendations their responses to an earlier FATF consultation paper are analysed. Interested parties were asked to provide feedback on a number of options proposed by the FATF. Twenty six of the 145 respondents provided feedback on issues relating to the gambling sector. It is these responses that form the bases of the analysis in this paper.FindingsThe preferences of the gambling sector were not taken on board by the FATF. The increased customer due diligence (CDD), suspicious transaction reporting and the identification of politically exposed persons will be a burden on casino operators, the only gambling sector to be specifically identified in the new recommendations. Non‐compliance could be a serious issue.Research limitations/implicationsThe small number of responses from the gambling sector does place limitations on the ability to generalise the outcomes to the global gambling industry, though five of the respondents were gambling organisations.Practical implicationsFor regulators, the possibility of non‐compliance by the gambling sector should be addressed as should the likelihood of pressure for reduced CDD procedures.Originality/valueThe FATF's updated 2003 Forty Recommendations impose considerable compliance costs on the financial sector. A number of other business sectors are also caught within the scope of these new recommendations. This paper addresses anti‐money laundering compliance issues for the gambling sector, an area not previously explored.

Illustrating the incentivised steps criminals take to launder cash while avoiding government anti-laundering measures

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 515-526
Author(s):  
Nicholas Gilmour
Keyword(s):  
Money Laundering ◽  
Design Methodology ◽  
Methodological Approach ◽  
Professional Experience ◽  
Policy Compliance ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Terrorism Financing ◽  
High Level ◽  
Theoretical Assessment ◽  
Practical Implications

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to illustrate the incentivised steps criminals take to launder cash while avoiding government’s anti-money laundering (AML) measures. Design/methodology/approach To illustrate how and when technology is most prominent in the money laundering process, this paper analyses the criminal’s methodological approach to “technology-enhanced money laundering” by examining several high-level examples. To strengthen the theoretical assessment and the overall validity of the findings, the author incorporates details from their own research and professional experience to maximise comprehension of the methodological process that organised criminals and money launderers alike look to undertake when placing illicitly derived cash in the money laundering cycle. Findings The AML model of “placement, layering and integration” is synonymous with presenting the process of money laundering – in the most basic or generic forms. This paper identifies that the placement stage is a primary stage through which technology is exploited to assist in the entire laundering process. Practical implications Using money laundering case studies, this paper identifies that existing AML/countering terrorism financing international perceptions/practices and typological studies are not adequate for presenting an accurate assessment of the process used to undertake money laundering. Originality/value This paper provides an examination of the practicalities behind the prevention of money laundering from a compliance and investigative perspective. The paper is of interest to those involved in policy, compliance and investigations associated with money laundering.

Designating lawyers as reporting entities under the Kenya’s anti-money laundering regime

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 637-649
Author(s):  
Kennedy Otieno Pambo
Keyword(s):  
Money Laundering ◽  
Design Methodology ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Confidential Information ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Practical Solution ◽  
Legal Professionals ◽  
Legislative Framework ◽  
Financial Action Task ◽  
Apparent Conflict

Purpose Kenya has made little progress in its endeavor to categorize lawyers as designated non-financial businesses and professionals (DNFBPs), despite making spirited attempts in 2007, 2018 and lately in 2019. The legal professionals are, therefore, not bound by the reporting and other stringent obligations imposed by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) to deter possible misuse by money launderers. The purpose of this paper, therefore, is to enumerate the ongoing efforts toward designating lawyers as DNFBPs in Kenya. The paper also assesses the institutional and legislative incentives (as well as barriers) for imposing the anti-money laundering (AML) duty thereto. Design/methodology/approach The paper provides a qualitative review of Kenya’s AML legislative framework and the potential support/hindrance to imposing the AML duty on lawyers. Also, this paper provides a suggestion for possible solutions. Findings The legislative framework in Kenya has outlawed money-laundering, and lawyers can be compelled to disclose confidential information observed in the course of employment if it embodies crime or fraud. Thus, imposing the AML obligation on lawyers is nothing out of the ordinary, rather a mere creation for a formal disclosure mechanism. However, this paper also revealed divergent views that merit reconciliation for the seamless designation of lawyers. Originality/value To enhance the legislative framework in Kenya, the paper borrows from the FATF’s Interpretive Note to Recommendation 23 and suggests a practical solution to the apparent conflict between the legal professional privilege and the AML duty.

Comprehensive cross-border declaration system as money-laundering prevention mechanism

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 292-300
Author(s):  
Salwa Zolkaflil ◽  
Normah Omar ◽  
Sharifah Nazatul Faiza Syed Mustapha Nazri
Keyword(s):  
Money Laundering ◽  
Design Methodology ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Asia Pacific ◽  
Evaluation Report ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Cross Border ◽  
Future Improvement ◽  
Financial Action Task ◽  
Mutual Evaluation

Purpose This study aims to discuss the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) Special Recommendation IX (SR IX) and the importance of complying with the recommendation, which focuses on cross-border declaration or disclosure with the objective to detect and prevent illicit cross-border transportation of cash and bearer negotiable instruments (BNIs). This study also looks into compliance ratings of Asia Pacific Group (APG) 40 countries on the FATF SR IX. Design/methodology/approach This study reviews the mutual evaluation reports issued by APG on money laundering from 2006 to 2012. Based on the mutual evaluation reports, this study also looks into recommendations and comments given by respective panels. The compliance ratings together with panel’s recommendations and comments compiled in this study will be helpful to relevant authorities for future improvement. Findings Complying to FATF SR IX helps relevant authorities in detecting and preventing illicit from cross-border transportation of cash and BNIs. Out of 40, only two countries received compliant rating, which shows the need of improvement to ensure that the country is compliant on FATF SR IX. Research limitations/implications This study is limited to the panel’s reviews and recommendations on mutual evaluation report and only focuses on FATF SR IX. Originality/value This paper analyzes the compliance characteristics of countries based on their FATF mutual evaluation report. It highlights the comments and recommendation for future improvement to ensure that these countries will comply with FATF SR IX.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document