The architecture design and evaluation process: A decision support framework for conducting and evaluating architecture studies

Author(s):  
Inki A. Min ◽  
Ryan A. Noguchi
2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. K. Kirkman ◽  
John K. Hiers A. ◽  
L. L. Smith ◽  
L. M. Conner ◽  
S. L. Zeigler ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 55 (5) ◽  
pp. 2890-2898 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tami C. Bond ◽  
Angela Bosco-Lauth ◽  
Delphine K. Farmer ◽  
Paul W. Francisco ◽  
Jeffrey R. Pierce ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
David Kik ◽  
Matthias Gerhard Wichmann ◽  
Thomas Stefan Spengler

AbstractLocation choice is a crucial planning task with major influence on a company’s future orientation and competitiveness. It is quite complex, since multiple location factors are usually of decision-relevance, incomparable, and sometimes conflictual. Further, ongoing urbanization is associated with locational dynamics posing major challenges for the regional location management of companies and municipalities. For example, respecting urban space as location factor, a scarcity growing over time leads to different assessment and requirements on a company’s behalf. For both companies and municipalities, there is a need for location development which implies an active change of location factor characteristics. Accordingly, considering locational dynamics is vital, as they may be decisive in the location decision-making. Although certain dynamics are considered within conventional Facility Location Problem (FLP) approaches, a systematic consideration of active location development is missing so far. Consequently, they may propagate long-term unfavorable location decisions, as major potentials associated with company-driven and municipal development measures are neglected. Therefore, this paper introduces a comprehensive decision support framework for the Regional Facility Location and Development planning Problem (RFLDP). It provides an operationalization of development measures, and thus anticipates dynamic adaptations to the environment. An established multi-criteria approach is extended to this new application. A complementary guideline ensures its meaningful applicability by practitioners. Based on a real-life case study, the decision support framework’s strength for practical application is demonstrated. Here, major advantages over conventional FLP approaches are highlighted. It is shown that the proposed methodology results in alternative location decisions which are structurally superior.


Energies ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 1357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Hirzel ◽  
Tim Hettesheimer ◽  
Peter Viebahn ◽  
Manfred Fischedick

New energy technologies may fail to make the transition to the market once research funding has ended due to a lack of private engagement to conclude their development. Extending public funding to cover such experimental developments could be one way to improve this transition. However, identifying promising research and development (R&D) proposals for this purpose is a difficult task for the following reasons: Close-to-market implementations regularly require substantial resources while public budgets are limited; the allocation of public funds needs to be fair, open, and documented; the evaluation is complex and subject to public sector regulations for public engagement in R&D funding. This calls for a rigorous evaluation process. This paper proposes an operational three-staged decision support system (DSS) to assist decision-makers in public funding institutions in the ex-ante evaluation of R&D proposals for large-scale close-to-market projects in energy research. The system was developed based on a review of literature and related approaches from practice combined with a series of workshops with practitioners from German public funding institutions. The results confirm that the decision-making process is a complex one that is not limited to simply scoring R&D proposals. Decision-makers also have to deal with various additional issues such as determining the state of technological development, verifying market failures or considering existing funding portfolios. The DSS that is suggested in this paper is unique in the sense that it goes beyond mere multi-criteria aggregation procedures and addresses these issues as well to help guide decision-makers in public institutions through the evaluation process.


2021 ◽  
Vol 38 ◽  
pp. 301216
Author(s):  
Daniela Mazzolini ◽  
Paolo Mignone ◽  
Patrizia Pavan ◽  
Gennaro Vessio

2018 ◽  
Vol 51 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ravindra Gettu ◽  
Radhakrishna G. Pillai ◽  
Manu Santhanam ◽  
Anusha S. Basavaraj ◽  
Sundar Rathnarajan ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 1683-1694 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. E. Livieris ◽  
T. Kotsilieris ◽  
V. Tampakas ◽  
P. Pintelas

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document