Incorporation of evidences into an intelligent computational argumentation network for a web-based collaborative engineering design system

Author(s):  
Xiaoqing Liu ◽  
Ekta Khudkhudia ◽  
Ming Leu
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Michael Anderson ◽  
Spence Chanthavane ◽  
Adam Broshkevitch ◽  
Paul Braden ◽  
Colton Bassford ◽  
...  

Abstract Demand is increasing for effective online tools to perform collaborative engineering design by geographically separated teams. In particular, tools that facilitate the concept ideation phase of the engineering design process are sought for immediate implementation in upcoming capstone engineering design courses. In this work researchers conducted a literature review, interviews with practicing engineers, and a thorough web search to identify available tools and the desired features and requirements. A set of 98 web-based collaborative tools were identified then filtered down to 18 candidates which met the minimum criteria. These 18 were systematically evaluated by the researchers who rated their satisfaction of eleven requirements. The five highest rated finalist platforms were more thoroughly tested by design teams who used the platforms in design sprint activities. Evaluator ratings and feedback were collected at multiple points and several best practices were discovered during testing. Conceptboard (www.conceptboard.com) received the highest evaluator ratings, with few negative comments, and is expected to be an effective tool for collaborative engineering design.


1995 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. C. Lam ◽  
J. W. Rockway ◽  
L. C. Russell ◽  
D. T. Wentworth

Author(s):  
Mahmoud Dinar ◽  
Yong-Seok Park ◽  
Jami J. Shah

Conventional syllabi of engineering design courses either do not pay enough attention to conceptual design skills, or they lack an objective assessment of those skills to show students’ progress. During a semester-long course of advanced engineering product design, we assigned three major design projects to twenty five students. For each project we asked them to formulate the problems in the Problem Formulator web-based testbed. In addition, we collected sketches for all three design problems, feasibility analyses for the last two, and a working prototype for the final project. We report the students’ problem formulation and ideation in terms of a set of nine problem formulation characteristics and ASU’s ideation effectiveness metrics respectively. We discuss the limitations that the choice of the design problems caused, and how the progress of a class of students during a semester-long design course resulted in a convergence in sets of metrics that we have defined to characterize problem formulation and ideation. We also review the results of students of a similar course which we reported last year in order to find common trends.


2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia M. Jones ◽  
Beth A. Brucker ◽  
Van J. Woods ◽  
Blessing F. Adeoye

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document