Beyond bottom-up: Incorporating task-dependent influences into a computational model of spatial attention

Author(s):  
Robert J. Peters ◽  
Laurent Itti
1994 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 377-387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan D. Cohen ◽  
Richard D. Romero ◽  
David Servan-Schreiber ◽  
Martha J. Farah

Parietal-damaged patients respond abnormally slowly to targets presented in the affected hemifield when preceded by cues in the intact hemifield. This inability to disengage attention from the ipsilesional field to reengage it in the contralesional field has been interpreted as evidence for a distinct “disengage” mechanism, localized in parietal cortex. We present a computational model that accounts for normal attentional effects by interactivity and competition among representations of different locations in space, without a dedicated “disengage” mechanism. We show that when the model is lesioned, it produces the “disengage deficit” shown by parietal-damaged patients. This suggests that the deficit observed in such patients can be understood as an emergent property of interactions among the remaining parts of the system, and need not imply the existence of a dedicated “disengage” mechanism in the normal brain.


2010 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 507-507
Author(s):  
A. Hsu ◽  
I. Scofield ◽  
G. Sperling

2017 ◽  
Vol 118 (1) ◽  
pp. 564-573 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonia Poltoratski ◽  
Sam Ling ◽  
Devin McCormack ◽  
Frank Tong

The visual system employs a sophisticated balance of attentional mechanisms: salient stimuli are prioritized for visual processing, yet observers can also ignore such stimuli when their goals require directing attention elsewhere. A powerful determinant of visual salience is local feature contrast: if a local region differs from its immediate surround along one or more feature dimensions, it will appear more salient. We used high-resolution functional MRI (fMRI) at 7T to characterize the modulatory effects of bottom-up salience and top-down voluntary attention within multiple sites along the early visual pathway, including visual areas V1–V4 and the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN). Observers viewed arrays of spatially distributed gratings, where one of the gratings immediately to the left or right of fixation differed from all other items in orientation or motion direction, making it salient. To investigate the effects of directed attention, observers were cued to attend to the grating to the left or right of fixation, which was either salient or nonsalient. Results revealed reliable additive effects of top-down attention and stimulus-driven salience throughout visual areas V1–hV4. In comparison, the LGN exhibited significant attentional enhancement but was not reliably modulated by orientation- or motion-defined salience. Our findings indicate that top-down effects of spatial attention can influence visual processing at the earliest possible site along the visual pathway, including the LGN, whereas the processing of orientation- and motion-driven salience primarily involves feature-selective interactions that take place in early cortical visual areas. NEW & NOTEWORTHY While spatial attention allows for specific, goal-driven enhancement of stimuli, salient items outside of the current focus of attention must also be prioritized. We used 7T fMRI to compare salience and spatial attentional enhancement along the early visual hierarchy. We report additive effects of attention and bottom-up salience in early visual areas, suggesting that salience enhancement is not contingent on the observer’s attentional state.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document