Simulation and Experimental Research Strategy for DACs with Proteus and Open Source Platforms

Author(s):  
Daniela Shehova ◽  
Slavi Lubomirov ◽  
Katya Asparuhova
1980 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 199-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Howard L. Miller ◽  
R. Michael O'Bannon ◽  
Kenneth B. Melvin

The issue of manipulation versus selection as a research strategy still seems to generate confusion. Present usage and past analyses of the issue are discussed. It is pointed out that the two approaches involve inferential problems at different points in the process of scientific generalization. Therefore, the strategies are complementary. Taken together, they can allow conclusions which neither alone could logically support.


Author(s):  
Fadi P. Deek ◽  
James A. M. McHugh
Keyword(s):  

2009 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 55-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas F. Pettigrew

This paper reviews the evidence for a secondary transfer effect of intergroup contact. Following a contact’s typical primary reduction in prejudice toward the outgroup involved in the contact, this effect involves a further, secondary reduction in prejudice toward noninvolved outgroups. Employing longitudinal German probability samples, we found that significant secondary transfer effects of intergroup contact exist, but they were limited to specific outgroups that are similar to the contacted outgroup in perceived stereotypes, status or stigma. Since the contact-prejudice link is bidirectional, the effect is inflated when prior prejudice reducing contact is not controlled. The strongest evidence derives from experimental research. Both cognitive (dissonance) and affective (evaluative conditioning) explanations for the effect are offered.


1983 ◽  
Vol 28 (10) ◽  
pp. 805-805
Author(s):  
Roger E. Kirk

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document