Parameter Estimation in Synaptic Coupling Model Using a Point Process Modeling Framework*

Author(s):  
Yalda Amidi ◽  
Behzad Nazari ◽  
Saeed Sadri ◽  
Uri T. Eden ◽  
Ali Yousefi
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-31
Author(s):  
Yalda Amidi ◽  
Behzad Nazari ◽  
Saeid Sadri ◽  
Ali Yousefi

It is of great interest to characterize the spiking activity of individual neurons in a cell ensemble. Many different mechanisms, such as synaptic coupling and the spiking activity of itself and its neighbors, drive a cell's firing properties. Though this is a widely studied modeling problem, there is still room to develop modeling solutions by simplifications embedded in previous models. The first shortcut is that synaptic coupling mechanisms in previous models do not replicate the complex dynamics of the synaptic response. The second is that the number of synaptic connections in these models is an order of magnitude smaller than in an actual neuron. In this research, we push this barrier by incorporating a more accurate model of the synapse and propose a system identification solution that can scale to a network incorporating hundreds of synaptic connections. Although a neuron has hundreds of synaptic connections, only a subset of these connections significantly contributes to its spiking activity. As a result, we assume the synaptic connections are sparse, and to characterize these dynamics, we propose a Bayesian point-process state-space model that lets us incorporate the sparsity of synaptic connections within the regularization technique into our framework. We develop an extended expectation-maximization. algorithm to estimate the free parameters of the proposed model and demonstrate the application of this methodology to the problem of estimating the parameters of many dynamic synaptic connections. We then go through a simulation example consisting of the dynamic synapses across a range of parameter values and show that the model parameters can be estimated using our method. We also show the application of the proposed algorithm in the intracellular data that contains 96 presynaptic connections and assess the estimation accuracy of our method using a combination of goodness-of-fit measures.


2020 ◽  
Vol 438 ◽  
pp. 109283
Author(s):  
Camila Leandro ◽  
Pierre Jay-Robert ◽  
Bruno Mériguet ◽  
Xavier Houard ◽  
Ian W. Renner

2018 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 381-400 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Zahrieh ◽  
Jacob J. Oleson ◽  
Paul A. Romitti

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weihan Li ◽  
Cunle Qian ◽  
Yu Qi ◽  
Yiwen Wang ◽  
Yueming Wang ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. BUKENYA ◽  
M. N. OLAYA ◽  
E. J. PINEDA ◽  
M. MAIARU

Woven polymer matrix composites (PMCs) are leveraged in aerospace applications for their desirable specific properties, yet they are vulnerable to high residual stresses during manufacturing and their complex geometry makes experimental results difficult to observe. Process modeling is needed to characterize the effects of the curing and predict end stress states. Finite element software can be used to model woven architectures, however accurate representation of processing conditions remains a challenge when it comes to selecting boundary conditions. The effect of BCs on process-induced stress within woven PMCs is studied. The commercial Finite Element Analysis (FEA) software Abaqus is coupled with user-written subroutines in a process modeling framework. A two-dimensionally (2D) woven PMC repeating unit cell (RUC) is modeled with TexGen and Abaqus. Virtual curing is imposed on the bulk matrix. The BC study is conducted with Free, Periodic, Flat, and Flat-Free configurations. Results show that the end stress state is sensitive to the boundary condition assumptions. Flat BC results show great agreement with Periodic BCs. Residual stress results from process modeling are then compared with a linear-elastic thermal cooldown analysis in Abaqus. Cooldown results indicate an overestimation in matrix stresses compared with process modeling.


Author(s):  
Gianluigi Greco ◽  
Antonella Guzzo ◽  
Luigi Pontieri ◽  
Domenico Saccà

Automatica ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 113 ◽  
pp. 108733
Author(s):  
Boris I. Godoy ◽  
Victor Solo ◽  
Syed Ahmed Pasha

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document