Proactive Behaviors in Engineering: The Role of Pre-College Characteristics, Resources, and Experiences

Author(s):  
Trevion S. Henderson ◽  
Emma Brennan-Wydra ◽  
Cynthia J. Finelli ◽  
Joanna M. Millunchick
2021 ◽  
pp. 154805182110348
Author(s):  
Fong-Yi Lai ◽  
Cheng-Chen Lin ◽  
Szu-Chi Lu ◽  
Hsiao-Ling Chen

This study conceptualizes team–member exchange as a mediator and transformational leadership as a moderator to understand the role of proactive personality in two types of proactive behaviors (affiliative and challenging). Considering the issue of common method variance, data were collected following a multitemporal and multisource research design, and the hypotheses were tested on a sample of 210 participants. The results showed that after controlling leader–member exchange, team–member exchange mediated the relationship between proactive personality and employees’ proactive behaviors. In addition, transformational leadership strengthened the positive relationship between the team–member exchange and challenging proactive behavior. Moreover, transformational leadership had a stronger moderating effect on challenging proactive behavior than affiliative proactive behavior. Strengths, limitations, practical implications, and directions for future research are discussed.


2013 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karoline Strauss ◽  
Mark A. Griffin ◽  
Sharon K. Parker ◽  
Claire M. Mason

2019 ◽  
Vol 112 ◽  
pp. 356-368 ◽  
Author(s):  
Talya N. Bauer ◽  
Serge Perrot ◽  
Robert C. Liden ◽  
Berrin Erdogan

2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (8) ◽  
pp. 1234-1250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ceyda Maden-Eyiusta

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the mediating impact of work engagement on the relationship between three developmental job resources (i.e. autonomy, task variety, and feedback) and proactive work behaviors. It also attempted to explore the moderating role of job fit (demands-abilities (D-A) fit and needs-supplies (N-S) fit) in the proposed model. Design/methodology/approach Data were collected from 225 employees in 20 small and medium-size enterprises in Istanbul, Turkey. Hypotheses were tested using hierarchical multiple regressions and hierarchical moderated regressions. Findings It was found that engagement mediated the relationships between job autonomy, task variety, and proactive behaviors. Results also revealed that the relationships between autonomy, task variety, and engagement were positive and significant only for the employees with low D-A fit while the positive impact of engagement on proactive behaviors existed only for those employees with high N-S fit. The conditional indirect impact of job resources on proactive behaviors was strongest when the D-A fit was low and the N-S fit was high while this effect was non-significant when the D-A fit was high and the N-S fit was (either) low or high. Research limitations/implications The generalizability of the findings is limited. Moreover, as the data are cross-sectional, it is not possible to derive causal inferences about the hypothesized relationships. Practical implications Organizations should provide their employees with more autonomy and task variety to enhance their engagement and proactivity. Moreover, organizations need to consider their employees’ level of job fit when they provide certain job resources. Originality/value This study tests the mediating role of engagement on the relationships between three developmental job resources and proactive behaviors. It also sheds light on the moderating role of job fit in the proposed mediation model.


JAMA ◽  
1966 ◽  
Vol 195 (12) ◽  
pp. 1005-1009 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. J. Fernbach
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document