Ebbinghaus illusion in the tactile modality

Author(s):  
Mounia Ziat ◽  
Erin Smith ◽  
Cecilia Brown ◽  
Carrie DeWolfe ◽  
Vincent Hayward
2010 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
YUKA YAMAZAKI ◽  
YUMIKO OTSUKA ◽  
SO KANAZAWA ◽  
MASAMI K. YAMAGUCHI
Keyword(s):  

1996 ◽  
Vol 82 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucia Zanuttini

Changes in the Ebbinghaus illusion across age groups have been studied with 80 children ( ns = 20) from 4 to 8 yr. old. The distortion, whose magnitude increases across age groups, depends on active cognitive comparative processes. In fact, if some cues make the geometrically identical inducing elements semantically different from the central one, the illusion decreases as older children develop conceptual categories. Across ages 4 to 8 years not only the magnitude of the illusion changes but also the interfering role of the taxonomic organization.


2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 220-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Moslem Bahmani ◽  
Jed A. Diekfuss ◽  
Robabeh Rostami ◽  
Nasim Ataee ◽  
Farhad Ghadiri

Enhanced expectancies are an important component of OPTIMAL theory and are thought to contribute to motor performance and learning. There is limited information, however, on the generalizability of OPTIMAL theory to highly skilled individuals. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of visual illusions, specifically an Ebbinghaus illusion, on the performance and learning of an aiming task using highly skilled 10-m rifle and pistol shooters. Two groups of shooters with international experience were recruited and practiced with perceived larger and smaller targets. Our results indicated that participants who perceived the target larger reported higher self-efficacy immediately after practice. In addition, these participants had higher shooting performance during practice. Our retention test (24 hours later), however, did not produce differences in self-efficacy or shooting performance. Our data suggests that visual illusions are beneficial for motor performance in highly skilled shooters, but may not affect learning in those who are in the latter stages of learning. Further studies should continue examining the role of visual illusions for enhancing expectancies in highly skilled and experienced performers.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeroen B.J. Smeets ◽  
Erik Kleijn ◽  
Marlijn van der Meijden ◽  
Eli Brenner

AbstractThere is an extensive literature debating whether perceived size is used to guide grasping. A possible reason for not using judged size is that using judged positions might lead to more precise movements. As this argument does not hold for small objects, and all studies showing an effect of the Ebbinghaus illusion on grasping used small objects, we hypothesized that size information is used for small objects but not for large ones. Using a modified diagonal illusion, we obtained an effect of about 10% on perceptual judgements, without an effect on grasping, irrespective of object size. We therefore reject our precision hypothesis. We discuss the results in the framework of grasping as moving digits to positions on an object. We conclude that the reported disagreement on the effect of illusions is because the Ebbinghaus illusion not only affects size, but –unlike most size illusions– also affects perceived positions.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (10) ◽  
pp. 110a
Author(s):  
Sofia Lavrenteva ◽  
Ikuya Murakami
Keyword(s):  

2010 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 888-888
Author(s):  
Y. Yamazaki ◽  
Y. Otsuka ◽  
S. Kanazawa ◽  
M. K. Yamaguchi
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document