Correlative study of MR diffusion weighted imaging with background body signal suppression features and different pathological types in lung carcinoma and pulmonary tuberculosis

Author(s):  
Yue Guan ◽  
Xihe Sun ◽  
Peng Dong ◽  
Guanghui Chang ◽  
Yanming Ge ◽  
...  
Neurology ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 61 (12) ◽  
pp. 1821-1823 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Agid ◽  
D. Ducreux ◽  
W.C. Halliday ◽  
W. Kucharczyk ◽  
K. G. terBrugge ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 104-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Ma ◽  
Sailike Duishanbai ◽  
Chun-Hui Jiang ◽  
Jun Lu ◽  
Wen-Ya Liu ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 105-114
Author(s):  
You-Hong Yuan ◽  
En-Hua Xiao ◽  
Zhong He ◽  
Ke Jin ◽  
Cong Ma ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 14 (36) ◽  
pp. 5557 ◽  
Author(s):  
You-Hong Yuan ◽  
En-Hua Xiao ◽  
Jian-Bin Liu ◽  
Zhong He ◽  
Ke Jin ◽  
...  

Medicina ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 55 (7) ◽  
pp. 394
Author(s):  
Ilze Apine ◽  
Monta Baduna ◽  
Reinis Pitura ◽  
Juris Pokrotnieks ◽  
Gaida Krumina

Background and objectives: The aim of the study was to assess whether there were differences between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and diffusion-weighted imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS) sequences in non-prepared and prepared bowels before and after preparation with an enteric hyperosmolar agent, to assess whether ADC measurements have the potential to avoid bowel preparation and whether ADC-DWIBS has advantages over ADC-DWI. Materials and Methods: 106 adult patients without evidence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) underwent magnetic resonance (MR) enterography before and after bowel preparation. ADC-DWI and ADC-DWIBS values were measured in the intestinal and colonic walls demonstrating high signal intensity (SI) at DWI tracking images of b = 800 s/mm2 before and after preparation. Results: There were significant difference (p < 0.0001) in both ADC-DWI and ADC-DWIBS results between non-prepared and prepared jejunum for DWI being 1.09 × 10−3 mm2/s and 1.76 × 10−3 mm2/s, respectively, and for DWIBS being 0.91 × 10−3 mm2/s and 1.75 × 10−3 mm2/s, respectively. Both ADC-DWI and DWIBS also showed significant difference between non-prepared and prepared colon (p < 0.0001), with DWI values 1.41 × 10−3 mm2/s and 2.13 × 10−3 mm2/s, and DWIBS—1.01 × 10−3 mm2/s and 2.04 × 10−3 mm2/s, respectively. No significant difference between ADC-DWI and ADC-DWIBS was found in prepared jejunum (p = 0.84) and prepared colon (p = 0.58), whereas a significant difference was found in non-prepared jejunum and non-prepared colon (p = 0.0001 in both samples). Conclusions: ADC between DWI and DWIBS does not differ in prepared bowel walls but demonstrates a difference in non-prepared bowel. ADC in non-prepared bowel is lower than in prepared bowel and possible overlap with the ADC range of IBD is possible in non-prepared bowel. ADC-DWIBS has no advantage over ADC-DWI in regard to IBD assessment.


2005 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 138-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronit Agid ◽  
Sivan Lieberman ◽  
Michael Nadjari ◽  
John M. Gomori

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document