Comparison of main models for generation-recombination space-charge current in abrupt p-n junction

Author(s):  
A. Gaci ◽  
A. Maxim ◽  
M. Ahmadpanah ◽  
D. Andreu ◽  
J. Boucher
Keyword(s):  
2000 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 797-803 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.L. Auge ◽  
C. Laurent ◽  
D. Fabiani ◽  
G.C. Montanari
Keyword(s):  

Physica ◽  
1941 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 1180-1182
Author(s):  
W. De Groot ◽  
C.J. Bakker

1993 ◽  
Vol 106 (10) ◽  
pp. 1291-1294
Author(s):  
B. Yang ◽  
G. Ciullo ◽  
V. Guidi ◽  
L. Tecchio

Author(s):  
Vinayak P. Dravid ◽  
V. Ravikumar ◽  
Richard Plass

With the advent of coherent electron sources with cold field emission guns (cFEGs), it has become possible to utilize the coherent interference phenomenon and perform “practical” electron holography. Historically, holography was envisioned to extent the resolution limit by compensating coherent aberrations. Indeed such work has been done with reasonable success in a few laboratories around the world. However, it is the ability of electron holography to map electrical and magnetic fields which has caught considerable attention of materials science community.There has been considerable theoretical work on formation of space charge on surfaces and internal interfaces. In particular, formation and nature of space charge have important implications for the performance of numerous electroceramics which derive their useful properties from electrically active grain boundaries. Bonnell and coworkers, in their elegant STM experiments provided the direct evidence for GB space charge and its sign, while Chiang et al. used the indirect but powerful technique of x-ray microchemical profiling across GBs to infer the nature of space charge.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document